Re: [RESEND 00/53] Rid GPU from W=1 warnings

From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: "David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Nouveau Dev" <nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Qinglang Miao" <miaoqinglang@huawei.com>,
	"Anthony Koo" <Anthony.Koo@amd.com>,
	"Jeremy Kolb" <jkolb@brandeis.edu>,
	"amd-gfx list" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Rob Clark" <rob.clark@linaro.org>,
	"VMware Graphics" <linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com>,
	"Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Dave Airlie" <airlied@redhat.com>,
	"open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
	<linux-media@vger.kernel.org>, "Leo Li" <sunpeng.li@amd.com>,
	"Roland Scheidegger" <sroland@vmware.com>,
	"moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
	<linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org>, "Sean Paul" <sean@poorly.run>,
	"Kuogee Hsieh" <khsieh@codeaurora.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Colin Ian King" <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	freedreno <freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND 00/53] Rid GPU from W=1 warnings
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 14:18:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKMK7uHkJGDL8k3FfAqAM78honZR0euMcacW8UpdPZfS1J-7cA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uEibsgXXTEM1d2CGSswp-koouPSouseP_rwLHTdpxfRpw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:32 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:17 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:19:32AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2021, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The vmwgfx ones look all good to me, so for
> > > > > > 23-53: Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com>
> > > > > > That said, they were already signed off by Zack, so not sure what
> > > > > > happened here.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, they were accepted at one point, then dropped without a reason.
> > > > >
> > > > > Since I rebased onto the latest -next, I had to pluck them back out of
> > > > > a previous one.
> > > >
> > > > They should show up in linux-next again. We merge patches for next merge
> > > > window even during the current merge window, but need to make sure they
> > > > don't pollute linux-next. Occasionally the cut off is wrong so patches
> > > > show up, and then get pulled again.
> > > >
> > > > Unfortunately especially the 5.12 merge cycle was very wobbly due to some
> > > > confusion here. But your patches should all be in linux-next again (they
> > > > are queued up for 5.13 in drm-misc-next, I checked that).
> > > >
> > > > Sorry for the confusion here.
> > >
> > > Oh, I see.  Well so long as they don't get dropped, I'll be happy.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the explanation Daniel
> >
> > After rebasing today, all of my GPU patches have remained.  Would
> > someone be kind enough to check that everything is still in order
> > please?
>
> It's still broken somehow. I've kiced Maxime and Maarten again,
> they're also on this thread.

You're patches have made it into drm-next meanwhile, so they should
show up in linux-next through that tree at least. Except if that one
also has some trouble.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel