From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13484C433C1 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 08:54:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFE45619F3 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 08:54:54 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AFE45619F3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D496E40A; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 08:54:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vk1-f177.google.com (mail-vk1-f177.google.com [209.85.221.177]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 090F66E40A for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 08:54:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk1-f177.google.com with SMTP id f11so5257698vkl.9 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 01:54:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xRxwIC3bM0aWnGeWfgHlFRedOLEA/dGDm4UbRmEj3Vw=; b=FxxA5/eYLrr1H2pnS6N+5Nx1J+TksoR86pXKF4xMfZXsMBdSy/WSzhhtgt13godeFq OyALu5LkTJn6MAYg4Edjzw+OrV3a4i3hYqLLvyqJq8pNEjtakf+v/1YXqD/EXaQXKgEs QWr3xSWu7ev4bBs7XnTfh+Q1YC3gfMezVlP7U6SdXEDvH9gQqH4fDDfNVL5De64S/nMR Z1mTOvNmaMTLl7bAuriIMQXailtd9RlQS+dXy14yl5vGKpMRYarf5BDLFEFMKaerh/jZ +/hj9P4NcHW1D5uueXWWPnBDgXKz3qPo1YcpIDbzj0Q8VNSnYtuAi3rcLJr5r9euzfea gmTA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533GlJaf6t6zJGsRxaWoECR+42oD/8aA5VbqxrZVcrhKC3tYRpyZ bwUKkFQ7VIMwpDRdZOufFWswsUFvt8b7/WEsTwo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzMDF6Nt1AF/bI08S3WTSedZ75tpHSB9bs9VB4XV/vIslxfCLJOjjnhguNbqq5W3XrjdDnyZdfuy6oLhuNoxdM= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:2502:: with SMTP id l2mr1032890vkl.5.1616576092193; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 01:54:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210228124106.135812-1-konrad.dybcio@somainline.org> <20210228124106.135812-2-konrad.dybcio@somainline.org> <20210322161810.biagj2qro66rv4gt@maple.lan> <20210323083935.GF2916463@dell> In-Reply-To: <20210323083935.GF2916463@dell> From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:54:40 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] video: backlight: qcom-wled: Add PMI8994 compatible To: Lee Jones X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Daniel Thompson , Kiran Gunda , Jingoo Han , linux-arm-msm , Konrad Dybcio , Andy Gross , DRI Development , Bjorn Andersson , Linux Fbdev development list , Rob Herring , martin.botka@somainline.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht, Pavel Machek , angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org, marijn.suijten@somainline.org, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-leds , Dan Murphy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" Hi Lee, On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 9:40 AM Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 22 Mar 2021, Daniel Thompson wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 01:41:05PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > > > Add a compatible for PMI8994 WLED. It uses the V4 of WLED IP. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio > > > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson > > Why are you Reviewing/Acking a patch that was applied on the 10th? Only 12 days later?!? It's not uncommon to receive acks for patches after they have been applied upstream. But it is if the patch was applied 10 years and 9 months ago! https://lore.kernel.org/linux-m68k/F5513AE92A5A1047AC2F91AEBB9202680288CBBA3983@E2K7-MS2.ds.strath.ac.uk/ Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel