From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Cc: "Corey Minyard" <cminyard@mvista.com>,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
"Antonio Borneo" <antonio.borneo@foss.st.com>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Laurent Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
"Andrzej Hajda" <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
"Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"Robert Foss" <rfoss@kernel.org>,
"Jonas Karlman" <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
"Kieran Bingham" <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>,
"Jernej Skrabec" <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"linux-media@vger.kernel.org" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Alessandro Zummo" <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
"Jiasheng Jiang" <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>,
"Abhinav Kumar" <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
"Fabrizio Castro" <fabrizio.castro.jz@renesas.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Ahmad Fatoum" <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>,
"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
"Neil Armstrong" <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
"Wolfram Sang" <wsa@kernel.org>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Hans Verkuil" <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>,
"linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/11] i2c: Enhance i2c_new_ancillary_device API
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 10:07:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdX4QxmFJi3q61ByOFG38KgcGMxPQMeXyPA3r1D9098BMg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdUhaSKiuVkmoYt1sm87emFZu7HSSCK-e95-Yy=g8Sgo4w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Biju,
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 9:53 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 6:11 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/11] i2c: Enhance i2c_new_ancillary_device API
> > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 12:45 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/11] i2c: Enhance i2c_new_ancillary_device
> > > > > API On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 10:43 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Perhaps we should first think through what an ancillary device
> > > > > > > really is. My understanding is that it is used to talk to
> > > > > > > secondary addresses of a multi-address I2C slave device.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As I mentioned somewhere before, this is not the case. Ancillary
> > > > > > devices are when one *driver* handles more than one address.
> > > > > > Everything else has been handled differently in the past (for all
> > > > > > the
> > > > > uses I am aware of).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yet, I have another idea which is so simple that I wonder if it
> > > > > > maybe has already been discussed so far?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * have two regs in the bindings
> > > > > > * use the second reg with i2c_new_client_device to instantiate the
> > > > > > RTC sibling. 'struct i2c_board_info', which is one parameter,
> > > should
> > > > > > have enough options to pass data, e.g it has a software_node.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Should work or did I miss something here?
> > > > >
> > > > > That should work, mostly (i2c_new_dummy_device() also calls
> > > > > i2c_new_client_device()). And as i2c_board_info has an of_node
> > > > > member (something I had missed before!), the new I2C device can
> > > > > access the clocks in the DT node using the standard way.
> > > >
> > > > Looks like, I cannot assign of_node member like below as it results in
> > > > pinctrl failure[1] during device bind.
> > > >
> > > > info.of_node = client->dev.of_node;
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > > pinctrl-rzg2l 11030000.pinctrl: pin P43_0 already requested by 3-0012;
> > > > cannot claim for 3-006f pinctrl-rzg2l 11030000.pinctrl: pin-344
> > > > (3-006f) status -22 pinctrl-rzg2l 11030000.pinctrl: could not request
> > > > pin 344 (P43_0) from group pmic on device pinctrl-rzg2l
> > > > raa215300 3-006f: Error applying setting, reverse things back
> > >
> > > Where do you have a reference to pin P43_0 in your DT?
> >
> > The reference to pin P43_0 is added in the PMIC node.
> >
> > I have done modification on my board to test PMIC INT# on RZ/G2L SMARC EVK
> > by wiring R83 on SoM module and PMOD0 PIN7.
> >
> > > The last versions you posted did not have any pinctrl properties?
> >
> > By default, PMIC_INT# is not populated RZ/G2L SMARC EVK, so I haven't added
> > Support for PMIC_INT# for the patches posted till date.
> >
> > Yesterday I checked with HW people, is there a way to enable PMIC_INT#
> > and they told me to do the above HW modification.
> >
> > Today I found this issue, with this modified HW and PMIC INT# enabled on the DT,
> > while assigning of_node of PMIC with info.of_node. It is just a coincidence.
>
> IC.
>
> So you now have two Linux devices pointing to the same DT node,
> causing pinctrl issues...
So don't set info.of_node? ;-)
Without of_node, devm_clk_get() and friends falls back to registered
clkdevs. So you could call clk_register_clkdev() from within the
PMIC driver, and can keep on using devm_clk_get_optional() in the
ISL1208 driver.
If that fails, there's also software_node.properties, or even the good
old platform_data...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-15 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230522101849.297499-1-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
2023-05-22 10:18 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] i2c: Enhance i2c_new_ancillary_device API Biju Das
2023-05-23 9:50 ` Hans Verkuil
2023-05-25 16:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-05-29 8:05 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-05-29 9:00 ` Biju Das
2023-05-31 8:59 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-05-31 9:34 ` Biju Das
2023-05-31 11:41 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-05-31 12:53 ` Biju Das
2023-05-31 13:35 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-05-31 13:44 ` Biju Das
2023-06-02 7:40 ` Biju Das
2023-05-31 13:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-05-31 13:47 ` Biju Das
2023-05-31 12:51 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-05-31 13:37 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-05-31 13:39 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-06-05 9:30 ` Wolfram Sang
2023-06-07 8:53 ` Wolfram Sang
2023-06-07 10:58 ` Biju Das
2023-06-08 6:41 ` Biju Das
2023-06-08 10:39 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-06-08 11:00 ` Biju Das
2023-06-08 12:50 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-06-08 12:57 ` Biju Das
2023-06-12 9:53 ` Biju Das
2023-06-12 12:23 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-06-12 12:42 ` Biju Das
2023-06-12 12:54 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-06-12 13:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-06-12 13:19 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-06-12 12:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-06-12 13:02 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-06-12 12:35 ` Wolfram Sang
2023-06-12 12:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-06-12 12:48 ` Wolfram Sang
2023-06-12 13:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-06-12 20:43 ` Wolfram Sang
2023-06-13 7:24 ` Biju Das
2023-06-13 17:57 ` Biju Das
2023-06-13 19:31 ` Biju Das
2023-06-14 8:13 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-06-14 8:21 ` Biju Das
2023-06-14 9:18 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-06-14 11:04 ` Biju Das
2023-06-15 9:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-06-14 9:54 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-06-14 11:30 ` Biju Das
2023-06-15 9:26 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-06-20 8:06 ` Biju Das
2023-06-13 7:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-06-13 10:45 ` Biju Das
2023-06-13 14:51 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-06-13 16:11 ` Biju Das
2023-06-14 7:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-06-14 8:02 ` Biju Das
2023-06-15 8:07 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2023-06-15 9:23 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-06-16 6:32 ` Wolfram Sang
2023-06-19 8:17 ` Biju Das
2023-06-12 13:00 ` Biju Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMuHMdX4QxmFJi3q61ByOFG38KgcGMxPQMeXyPA3r1D9098BMg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
--cc=antonio.borneo@foss.st.com \
--cc=biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cminyard@mvista.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=fabrizio.castro.jz@renesas.com \
--cc=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
--cc=kabel@kernel.org \
--cc=kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com \
--cc=rfoss@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).