Re: [Mesa-dev] [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 1/2] drm/doc/rfc: i915 GuC submission / DRM scheduler

[Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>]

On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 at 03:39, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 04:33:56PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > Add entry for i915 GuC submission / DRM scheduler integration plan.
> > Follow up patch with details of new parallel submission uAPI to come.
> >
> > v2:
> >  (Daniel Vetter)
> >   - Expand explaination of why bonding isn't supported for GuC
> >     submission
> >   - CC some of the DRM scheduler maintainers
> >   - Add priority inheritance / boosting use case
> >   - Add reasoning for removing in order assumptions
> >  (Daniel Stone)
> >   - Add links to priority spec
> >
> > Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> > Cc: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>
> > Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
> > Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> > Cc: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
> > Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
> > Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> > Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
> > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>
> You have a one-line hunk in the next patch that probably should be here.
> With that moved.
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

And yes having the todos for GuC tracked would be good externally, so
pressure can be applied for new fw releases with those features.

Dave.