RE: [PATCH] drm/dp_mst: Have DP_Tx send one msg at a time

["Lin, Wayne" <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>]

[AMD Public Use]

Appreciate for your time.
Thanks!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2020 5:58 AM
> To: Lin, Wayne <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org;
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Kazlauskas, Nicholas <Nicholas.Kazlauskas@amd.com>; Wentland, Harry
> <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>; Zuo, Jerry <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/dp_mst: Have DP_Tx send one msg at a time
> 
> Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> 
> I will push this to drm-misc-fixes in just a moment, thanks!
> 
> On Mon, 2020-01-13 at 17:36 +0800, Wayne Lin wrote:
> > [Why]
> > Noticed this while testing MST with the 4 ports MST hub from
> > StarTech.com. Sometimes can't light up monitors normally and get the
> > error message as 'sideband msg build failed'.
> >
> > Look into aux transactions, found out that source sometimes will send
> > out another down request before receiving the down reply of the
> > previous down request. On the other hand, in drm_dp_get_one_sb_msg(),
> > current code doesn't handle the interleaved replies case. Hence,
> > source can't build up message completely and can't light up monitors.
> >
> > [How]
> > For good compatibility, enforce source to send out one down request at
> > a time. Add a flag, is_waiting_for_dwn_reply, to determine if the
> > source can send out a down request immediately or not.
> >
> > - Check the flag before calling process_single_down_tx_qlock to send
> > out a msg
> > - Set the flag when successfully send out a down request
> > - Clear the flag when successfully build up a down reply
> > - Clear the flag when find erros during sending out a down request
> > - Clear the flag when find errors during building up a down reply
> > - Clear the flag when timeout occurs during waiting for a down reply
> > - Use drm_dp_mst_kick_tx() to try to send another down request in
> > queue at the end of drm_dp_mst_wait_tx_reply() (attempt to send out
> > messages in queue when errors occur)
> >
> > Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> >  include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h       |  6 ++++++
> >  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > index 4395d5cc0645..3542af15387a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > @@ -1195,6 +1195,8 @@ static int drm_dp_mst_wait_tx_reply(struct
> > drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb,
> >  		    txmsg->state == DRM_DP_SIDEBAND_TX_SENT) {
> >  			mstb->tx_slots[txmsg->seqno] = NULL;
> >  		}
> > +		mgr->is_waiting_for_dwn_reply = false;
> > +
> >  	}
> >  out:
> >  	if (unlikely(ret == -EIO) && drm_debug_enabled(DRM_UT_DP)) { @@
> > -1204,6 +1206,7 @@ static int drm_dp_mst_wait_tx_reply(struct
> > drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb,
> >  	}
> >  	mutex_unlock(&mgr->qlock);
> >
> > +	drm_dp_mst_kick_tx(mgr);
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -2770,9 +2773,11 @@ static void process_single_down_tx_qlock(struct
> > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
> >  	ret = process_single_tx_qlock(mgr, txmsg, false);
> >  	if (ret == 1) {
> >  		/* txmsg is sent it should be in the slots now */
> > +		mgr->is_waiting_for_dwn_reply = true;
> >  		list_del(&txmsg->next);
> >  	} else if (ret) {
> >  		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed to send msg in q %d\n", ret);
> > +		mgr->is_waiting_for_dwn_reply = false;
> >  		list_del(&txmsg->next);
> >  		if (txmsg->seqno != -1)
> >  			txmsg->dst->tx_slots[txmsg->seqno] = NULL; @@ -2812,7
> +2817,8 @@
> > static void drm_dp_queue_down_tx(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> >  		drm_dp_mst_dump_sideband_msg_tx(&p, txmsg);
> >  	}
> >
> > -	if (list_is_singular(&mgr->tx_msg_downq))
> > +	if (list_is_singular(&mgr->tx_msg_downq) &&
> > +	    !mgr->is_waiting_for_dwn_reply)
> >  		process_single_down_tx_qlock(mgr);
> >  	mutex_unlock(&mgr->qlock);
> >  }
> > @@ -3743,6 +3749,7 @@ static int drm_dp_mst_handle_down_rep(struct
> > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
> >  	mutex_lock(&mgr->qlock);
> >  	txmsg->state = DRM_DP_SIDEBAND_TX_RX;
> >  	mstb->tx_slots[slot] = NULL;
> > +	mgr->is_waiting_for_dwn_reply = false;
> >  	mutex_unlock(&mgr->qlock);
> >
> >  	wake_up_all(&mgr->tx_waitq);
> > @@ -3752,6 +3759,9 @@ static int drm_dp_mst_handle_down_rep(struct
> > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
> >  no_msg:
> >  	drm_dp_mst_topology_put_mstb(mstb);
> >  clear_down_rep_recv:
> > +	mutex_lock(&mgr->qlock);
> > +	mgr->is_waiting_for_dwn_reply = false;
> > +	mutex_unlock(&mgr->qlock);
> >  	memset(&mgr->down_rep_recv, 0, sizeof(struct
> > drm_dp_sideband_msg_rx));
> >
> >  	return 0;
> > @@ -4591,7 +4601,7 @@ static void drm_dp_tx_work(struct work_struct
> *work)
> >  	struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr = container_of(work, struct
> > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr, tx_work);
> >
> >  	mutex_lock(&mgr->qlock);
> > -	if (!list_empty(&mgr->tx_msg_downq))
> > +	if (!list_empty(&mgr->tx_msg_downq) &&
> > +!mgr->is_waiting_for_dwn_reply)
> >  		process_single_down_tx_qlock(mgr);
> >  	mutex_unlock(&mgr->qlock);
> >  }
> > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
> > b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h index 942575de86a0..d0b45468135a
> > 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
> > @@ -610,6 +610,12 @@ struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr {
> >  	 * &drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx.state once they are queued
> >  	 */
> >  	struct mutex qlock;
> > +
> > +	/**
> > +	 * @is_waiting_for_dwn_reply: indicate whether is waiting for down
> > reply
> > +	 */
> > +	bool is_waiting_for_dwn_reply;
> > +
> >  	/**
> >  	 * @tx_msg_downq: List of pending down replies.
> >  	 */
> --
> Cheers,
> 	Lyude Paul
--
Best regards,
Wayne Lin
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel