dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/22] drm/i915/guc: Fix outstanding G2H accounting
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 11:39:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YRuD0bTDQTivDZux@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210816135139.10060-3-matthew.brost@intel.com>

On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 06:51:19AM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> A small race that could result in incorrect accounting of the number
> of outstanding G2H. Basically prior to this patch we did not increment
> the number of outstanding G2H if we encoutered a GT reset while sending
> a H2G. This was incorrect as the context state had already been updated
> to anticipate a G2H response thus the counter should be incremented.
> 
> Fixes: f4eb1f3fe946 ("drm/i915/guc: Ensure G2H response has space in buffer")
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> index 69faa39da178..b5d3972ae164 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> @@ -360,11 +360,13 @@ static int guc_submission_send_busy_loop(struct intel_guc *guc,
>  {
>  	int err;
>  
> -	err = intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, len, g2h_len_dw, loop);
> -
> -	if (!err && g2h_len_dw)
> +	if (g2h_len_dw)
>  		atomic_inc(&guc->outstanding_submission_g2h);
>  
> +	err = intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, len, g2h_len_dw, loop);

I'm majorly confused by the _busy_loop naming scheme, especially here.
Like "why do we want to send a busy loop comand to guc, this doesn't make
sense".

It seems like you're using _busy_loop as a suffix for "this is ok to be
called in atomic context". The linux kernel bikeshed for this is generally
_atomic() (or _in_atomic() or something like that).  Would be good to
rename to make this slightly less confusing.
-Daniel

> +	if (err == -EBUSY && g2h_len_dw)
> +		atomic_dec(&guc->outstanding_submission_g2h);
> +
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.32.0
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-17  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-16 13:51 [PATCH 00/22] Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC Matthew Brost
2021-08-16 13:51 ` [PATCH 01/22] drm/i915/guc: Fix blocked context accounting Matthew Brost
2021-08-16 13:51 ` [PATCH 02/22] drm/i915/guc: Fix outstanding G2H accounting Matthew Brost
2021-08-17  9:39   ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2021-08-17 18:17     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-16 13:51 ` [PATCH 03/22] drm/i915/guc: Unwind context requests in reverse order Matthew Brost
2021-08-16 13:51 ` [PATCH 04/22] drm/i915/guc: Don't drop ce->guc_active.lock when unwinding context Matthew Brost
2021-08-16 13:51 ` [PATCH 05/22] drm/i915/guc: Workaround reset G2H is received after schedule done G2H Matthew Brost
2021-08-17  9:32   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-17 15:03     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-16 13:51 ` [PATCH 06/22] drm/i915/execlists: Do not propagate errors to dependent fences Matthew Brost
2021-08-17  9:21   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-17 15:08     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-17 15:49       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-16 13:51 ` [PATCH 07/22] drm/i915/selftests: Add a cancel request selftest that triggers a reset Matthew Brost
2021-08-16 13:51 ` [PATCH 08/22] drm/i915/guc: Don't enable scheduling on a banned context, guc_id invalid, not registered Matthew Brost
2021-08-17  9:47   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-17  9:57     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-17 16:44     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-16 13:51 ` [PATCH 09/22] drm/i915/selftests: Fix memory corruption in live_lrc_isolation Matthew Brost
2021-08-16 13:51 ` [PATCH 10/22] drm/i915/selftests: Add initial GuC selftest for scrubbing lost G2H Matthew Brost
2021-08-16 13:51 ` [PATCH 11/22] drm/i915/guc: Take context ref when cancelling request Matthew Brost
2021-08-16 13:51 ` [PATCH 12/22] drm/i915/guc: Don't touch guc_state.sched_state without a lock Matthew Brost
2021-08-17  7:21   ` kernel test robot
2021-08-16 13:51 ` [PATCH 13/22] drm/i915/guc: Reset LRC descriptor if register returns -ENODEV Matthew Brost
2021-08-16 13:51 ` [PATCH 14/22] drm/i915: Allocate error capture in atomic context Matthew Brost
2021-08-17 10:06   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-17 16:12     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-16 13:51 ` [PATCH 15/22] drm/i915/guc: Flush G2H work queue during reset Matthew Brost
2021-08-17 10:06   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-16 13:51 ` [PATCH 16/22] drm/i915/guc: Release submit fence from an IRQ Matthew Brost
2021-08-17 10:08   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-16 13:51 ` [PATCH 17/22] drm/i915/guc: Move guc_blocked fence to struct guc_state Matthew Brost
2021-08-17 10:10   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-16 13:51 ` [PATCH 18/22] drm/i915/guc: Rework and simplify locking Matthew Brost
2021-08-17 10:15   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-17 15:30     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-16 13:51 ` [PATCH 19/22] drm/i915/guc: Proper xarray usage for contexts_lookup Matthew Brost
2021-08-17 10:27   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-08-17 15:26     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-17 17:13       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-17 17:13         ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-16 13:51 ` [PATCH 20/22] drm/i915/guc: Drop pin count check trick between sched_disable and re-pin Matthew Brost
2021-08-16 13:51 ` [PATCH 21/22] drm/i915/guc: Move GuC priority fields in context under guc_active Matthew Brost
2021-08-16 13:51 ` [PATCH 22/22] drm/i915/guc: Add GuC kernel doc Matthew Brost
2021-08-17 11:11   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-17 16:36     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-17 17:20       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-17 17:27         ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-08-17 17:34           ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-17 20:41             ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-08-17 21:49               ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YRuD0bTDQTivDZux@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).