dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
To: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 01/10] lib/ref_tracker: add unlocked leak print helper
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2023 23:59:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZBeT5cWWqY4hkqu6@ashyti-mobl2.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230224-track_gt-v4-1-464e8ab4c9ab@intel.com>

Hi Andrzej,

[...]

> diff --git a/lib/ref_tracker.c b/lib/ref_tracker.c
> index dc7b14aa3431e2..5e9f90bbf771b0 100644
> --- a/lib/ref_tracker.c
> +++ b/lib/ref_tracker.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,38 @@ struct ref_tracker {
>  	depot_stack_handle_t	free_stack_handle;
>  };
>  
> +void __ref_tracker_dir_print(struct ref_tracker_dir *dir,
> +			   unsigned int display_limit)

can we call this ref_tracker_dir_print_locked() instead of using
the '__'?

> +{
> +	struct ref_tracker *tracker;
> +	unsigned int i = 0;
> +
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&dir->lock);
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(tracker, &dir->list, head) {
> +		if (i < display_limit) {
> +			pr_err("leaked reference.\n");
> +			if (tracker->alloc_stack_handle)
> +				stack_depot_print(tracker->alloc_stack_handle);
> +			i++;
> +		} else {
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ref_tracker_dir_print);
> +
> +void ref_tracker_dir_print(struct ref_tracker_dir *dir,
> +			   unsigned int display_limit)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&dir->lock, flags);
> +	__ref_tracker_dir_print(dir, display_limit);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dir->lock, flags);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ref_tracker_dir_print);
> +
>  void ref_tracker_dir_exit(struct ref_tracker_dir *dir)
>  {
>  	struct ref_tracker *tracker, *n;
> @@ -27,13 +59,13 @@ void ref_tracker_dir_exit(struct ref_tracker_dir *dir)
>  		kfree(tracker);
>  		dir->quarantine_avail++;
>  	}
> -	list_for_each_entry_safe(tracker, n, &dir->list, head) {
> -		pr_err("leaked reference.\n");
> -		if (tracker->alloc_stack_handle)
> -			stack_depot_print(tracker->alloc_stack_handle);
> +	if (!list_empty(&dir->list)) {
> +		__ref_tracker_dir_print(dir, 16);
>  		leak = true;
> -		list_del(&tracker->head);
> -		kfree(tracker);
> +		list_for_each_entry_safe(tracker, n, &dir->list, head) {
> +			list_del(&tracker->head);
> +			kfree(tracker);
> +		}

Just thinking whether this should go on a different patch, but I
don't have a strong opinion.

Looks good!

Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-19 23:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-06 16:31 [PATCH v4 00/10] drm/i915: use ref_tracker library for tracking wakerefs Andrzej Hajda
2023-03-06 16:31 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] lib/ref_tracker: add unlocked leak print helper Andrzej Hajda
2023-03-19 22:59   ` Andi Shyti [this message]
2023-03-20 15:30     ` [Intel-gfx] " Andrzej Hajda
2023-03-06 16:31 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] lib/ref_tracker: __ref_tracker_dir_print improve printing Andrzej Hajda
2023-03-19 23:11   ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2023-03-20 15:39     ` Andrzej Hajda
2023-03-06 16:31 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] lib/ref_tracker: add printing to memory buffer Andrzej Hajda
2023-03-19 23:18   ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2023-03-20 18:24     ` Andrzej Hajda
2023-03-06 16:32 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] lib/ref_tracker: remove warnings in case of allocation failure Andrzej Hajda
2023-03-19 23:19   ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2023-03-06 16:32 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] drm/i915: Separate wakeref tracking types from rpm Andrzej Hajda
2023-03-06 16:32 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] drm/i915: Separate wakeref tracking Andrzej Hajda
2023-03-19 23:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2023-03-20 18:39     ` Andrzej Hajda
2023-03-06 16:32 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] drm/i915: Track leaked gt->wakerefs Andrzej Hajda
2023-03-06 16:32 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] drm/i915: Correct type of wakeref variable Andrzej Hajda
2023-03-19 23:58   ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2023-03-06 16:32 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] drm/i915: replace Intel internal tracker with kernel core ref_tracker Andrzej Hajda
2023-03-06 16:32 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] drm/i915/gt: Hold a wakeref for the active VM Andrzej Hajda
2023-03-17 11:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 00/10] drm/i915: use ref_tracker library for tracking wakerefs Andrzej Hajda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZBeT5cWWqY4hkqu6@ashyti-mobl2.lan \
    --to=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
    --cc=chris.p.wilson@intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).