From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>,
"Zanoni, Paulo R" <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: "Nikula, Jani" <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Hellstrom, Thomas" <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>,
"Vetter, Daniel" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
"christian.koenig@amd.com" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 00/20] drm/i915/vm_bind: Add VM_BIND functionality
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 15:05:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab3149ab-730b-c3d5-5296-518a9611dd64@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9097e704-841e-673d-4969-73ffc8f9093f@linux.intel.com>
On 10/11/2022 14:47, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 10/11/2022 05:49, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 04:16:25PM -0800, Zanoni, Paulo R wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 00:51 -0800, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
>>>> DRM_I915_GEM_VM_BIND/UNBIND ioctls allows UMD to bind/unbind GEM
>>>> buffer objects (BOs) or sections of a BOs at specified GPU virtual
>>>> addresses on a specified address space (VM). Multiple mappings can map
>>>> to the same physical pages of an object (aliasing). These mappings
>>>> (also
>>>> referred to as persistent mappings) will be persistent across multiple
>>>> GPU submissions (execbuf calls) issued by the UMD, without user having
>>>> to provide a list of all required mappings during each submission (as
>>>> required by older execbuf mode).
>>>>
>>>> This patch series support VM_BIND version 1, as described by the param
>>>> I915_PARAM_VM_BIND_VERSION.
>>>>
>>>> Add new execbuf3 ioctl (I915_GEM_EXECBUFFER3) which only works in
>>>> vm_bind mode. The vm_bind mode only works with this new execbuf3 ioctl.
>>>> The new execbuf3 ioctl will not have any execlist support and all the
>>>> legacy support like relocations etc., are removed.
>>>>
>>>> NOTEs:
>>>> * It is based on below VM_BIND design+uapi rfc.
>>>> Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_vm_bind.rst
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> One difference for execbuf3 that I noticed that is not mentioned in the
>>> RFC document is that we now don't have a way to signal
>>> EXEC_OBJECT_WRITE. When looking at the Kernel code, some there are some
>>> pieces that check for this flag:
>>>
>>> - there's code that deals with frontbuffer rendering
>>> - there's code that deals with fences
>>> - there's code that prevents self-modifying batches
>>> - another that seems related to waiting for objects
>>>
>>> Are there any new rules regarding frontbuffer rendering when we use
>>> execbuf3? Any other behavior changes related to the other places that
>>> we should expect when using execbuf3?
>>>
>>
>> Paulo,
>> Most of the EXEC_OBJECT_WRITE check in execbuf path is related to
>> implicit dependency tracker which execbuf3 does not support. The
>> frontbuffer related updated is the only exception and I don't
>> remember the rationale to not require this on execbuf3.
>>
>> Matt, Tvrtko, Daniel, can you please comment here?
>
> Does not ring a bell to me. Looking at the code it certainly looks like
> it would be silently failing to handle it properly.
>
> I'll let people with more experience in this area answer, but from my
> point of view, if it is decided that it can be left unsupported, then we
> probably need a way of failing the ioctl is used against a frontbuffer,
> or something, instead of having display corruption.
Maybe it's a coincidence but there is:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/110715/
Which looks relevant. Maarten, any hints here?
>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-10 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-07 8:51 [PATCH v6 00/20] drm/i915/vm_bind: Add VM_BIND functionality Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2022-11-07 8:51 ` [PATCH v6 01/20] drm/i915/vm_bind: Expose vm lookup function Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2022-11-07 8:51 ` [PATCH v6 02/20] drm/i915/vm_bind: Add __i915_sw_fence_await_reservation() Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2022-11-07 8:51 ` [PATCH v6 03/20] drm/i915/vm_bind: Expose i915_gem_object_max_page_size() Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2022-11-07 8:51 ` [PATCH v6 04/20] drm/i915/vm_bind: Add support to create persistent vma Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2022-11-07 8:51 ` [PATCH v6 05/20] drm/i915/vm_bind: Implement bind and unbind of object Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2022-11-10 1:28 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2022-11-10 16:32 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2022-11-10 21:21 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2022-11-07 8:51 ` [PATCH v6 06/20] drm/i915/vm_bind: Support for VM private BOs Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2022-11-07 8:51 ` [PATCH v6 07/20] drm/i915/vm_bind: Add support to handle object evictions Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2022-11-07 8:51 ` [PATCH v6 08/20] drm/i915/vm_bind: Support persistent vma activeness tracking Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2022-11-07 8:51 ` [PATCH v6 09/20] drm/i915/vm_bind: Add out fence support Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2022-11-07 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 10/20] drm/i915/vm_bind: Abstract out common execbuf functions Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2022-11-07 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 11/20] drm/i915/vm_bind: Use common execbuf functions in execbuf path Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2022-11-07 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 12/20] drm/i915/vm_bind: Implement I915_GEM_EXECBUFFER3 ioctl Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2022-11-07 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 13/20] drm/i915/vm_bind: Update i915_vma_verify_bind_complete() Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2022-11-07 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 14/20] drm/i915/vm_bind: Expose i915_request_await_bind() Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2022-11-07 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 15/20] drm/i915/vm_bind: Handle persistent vmas in execbuf3 Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2022-11-07 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 16/20] drm/i915/vm_bind: userptr dma-resv changes Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2022-11-07 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 17/20] drm/i915/vm_bind: Limit vm_bind mode to non-recoverable contexts Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2022-11-07 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 18/20] drm/i915/vm_bind: Add uapi for user to enable vm_bind_mode Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2022-11-07 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 19/20] drm/i915/vm_bind: Render VM_BIND documentation Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2022-11-07 8:52 ` [PATCH v6 20/20] drm/i915/vm_bind: Async vm_unbind support Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2022-11-08 1:39 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2022-11-08 15:46 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2022-11-09 17:52 ` Matthew Auld
2022-11-09 20:11 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2022-11-09 21:13 ` Andi Shyti
2022-11-10 0:28 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2022-11-10 0:16 ` [PATCH v6 00/20] drm/i915/vm_bind: Add VM_BIND functionality Zanoni, Paulo R
2022-11-10 5:49 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2022-11-10 14:47 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-11-10 15:05 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2022-11-10 21:37 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ab3149ab-730b-c3d5-5296-518a9611dd64@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@intel.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).