dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
To: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Cc: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
Subject: Re: Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 / 3.0 regression ignored?
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 18:55:48 +0300 (EEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1107231847520.4843@tiger> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yunsjpyrqf7.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>

Hi Keith,

On Fri, 22 Jul 2011, Keith Packard wrote:
>> Sorry, to me it all looked like "UMS is being ignored forever".
>
> You're right, of course -- UMS is a huge wart on the kernel driver at
> this point, keeping it working while also adding new functionality
> continues to cause challenges. We tend to expect that most people will
> run reasonably contemporaneous kernel and user space code, and so three
> years after the switch, it continues to surprise us when someone
> actually tries UMS.

I know I sound like a broken record but I really wish you i915 devs were 
little more eager to revert broken patches early rather than late. I mean, 
this particular breakage was already bisected but nobody said or 
did anything - and it's not like it's the first time either!

I suppose I need to bribe Linus somehow to be more strict with you folks.

 			Pekka

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-07-23 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-20 17:06 Major 2.6.38 regression ignored? Luke-Jr
2011-05-20 18:08 ` Ray Lee
2011-05-20 20:24   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-20 21:11     ` Ray Lee
2011-05-21  8:41   ` Chris Wilson
2011-05-21 15:23     ` Luke-Jr
2011-05-21 15:40       ` Chris Wilson
2011-05-21 19:33         ` Luke-Jr
2011-05-28 13:19         ` Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 " Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-12 17:17           ` [Intel-gfx] " Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-12 18:07             ` Pekka Enberg
     [not found]               ` <CA+55aFxakA2U+oMJ1T7awTYa+p6xp9N0aCbfrUqgkF7BJ8gnQw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-07-22 11:08                 ` Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 / 3.0 " Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 14:12                   ` Herbert Xu
2011-07-22 18:00                   ` Keith Packard
2011-07-22 20:23                     ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 20:50                       ` Keith Packard
2011-07-22 21:08                         ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 21:31                           ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-23 15:10                             ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Deucher
2011-07-23 18:19                               ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-23 15:55                         ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2011-07-25  4:29                           ` Keith Packard
2011-07-26 13:48                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 12:08                         ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 14:00                           ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2011-08-09 14:47                             ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 15:09                               ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2011-08-09 15:34                                 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 16:02                                   ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2011-08-09 16:32                                     ` [Intel-gfx] " Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 16:56                                       ` Ray Lee
2011-08-09 17:40                                         ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 17:43                                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Ray Lee
2011-08-10  8:36                                             ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-10  9:41                                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Alan Cox
2011-08-10 11:37                                             ` Kirill Smelkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1107231847520.4843@tiger \
    --to=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=florian@mickler.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=keithp@keithp.com \
    --cc=kirr@mns.spb.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luke@dashjr.org \
    --cc=ray-lk@madrabbit.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).