Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-misc tree

[Luben Tuikov <ltuikov89@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2195 bytes --]

On 2023-11-16 04:22, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 09:56:32PM -0500, Luben Tuikov wrote:
>> On 2023-11-13 21:45, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi Luben,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 20:32:40 -0500 Luben Tuikov <ltuikov89@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2023-11-13 20:08, Luben Tuikov wrote:
>>>>> On 2023-11-13 15:55, Stephen Rothwell wrote:  
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Commit
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   0da611a87021 ("dma-buf: add dma_fence_timestamp helper")
>>>>>>
>>>>>> is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.
>>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>> In order to merge the scheduler changes necessary for the Xe driver, those changes
>>>>> were based on drm-tip, which included this change from drm-misc-fixes, but which
>>>>> wasn't present in drm-misc-next.
>>>>>
>>>>> I didn't want to create a merge conflict between drm-misc-next and drm-misc-fixes,
>>>>> when pulling that change from drm-misc-next to drm-misc-fixes, so that I can apply  
>>>>
>>>> ... when pulling that change from from drm-misc-fixes into drm-misc-next, so that I can apply...
>>>>
>>>>> the Xe scheduler changes on top of drm-misc-next.  
>>>>
>>>> The change in drm-misc-fixes is b83ce9cb4a465b. The latter is contained
>>>> in linus-master, and in drm-misc-fixes, while the former is in drm-misc-next.
>>>> When we merge linus-master/drm-misc-fixes into drm-misc-next, or whichever way
>>>> it happens, I'd like to avoid a merge conflict, but wanted to expedite the changes
>>>> for Xe.
>>>
>>> None of that is relevant ... if you commit a patch to a tree that will
>>> be in the linux kernel tree, you must add your Signed-off-by to the commit.
>>
>> Noted!
>>
>> So I always do this when I do git-am and such, but wasn't sure for this one single cherry-pick whose
>> original author was the committer in drm-misc-fixes, but will add my Signed-off-by in those
>> rare circumstances.
>>
>> Thanks for the clarification!
> 
> In order to move forward with this, can you provide your SoB here for
> that patch so that we can at least point to it in the drm-misc-next PR?
> 
> Maxime

Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov89@gmail.com>

-- 
Regards,
Luben

[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 677 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 236 bytes --]