From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 04/19] KVM: x86: mmu: allow to enable write tracking externally
Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 13:21:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e79a98afda1920a3f8fadd13dc6a20ef2719eeb2.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YoZv8HmRc7tqQbuL@google.com>
On Thu, 2022-05-19 at 16:27 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > This will be used to enable write tracking from nested AVIC code
> > and can also be used to enable write tracking in GVT-g module
> > when it actually uses it as opposed to always enabling it,
> > when the module is compiled in the kernel.
>
> Wrap at ~75.
Well, the checkpatch.pl didn't complain, so I didn't notice.
>
> > No functional change intended.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
> > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h | 1 +
> > arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h | 8 +++++---
> > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
> > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c | 10 ++++++++--
> > 5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > index 636df87542555..fc7df778a3d71 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -1254,7 +1254,7 @@ struct kvm_arch {
> > * is used as one input when determining whether certain memslot
> > * related allocations are necessary.
> > */
>
> The above comment needs to be rewritten.
Good catch, thank a lot!!
>
> > - bool shadow_root_allocated;
> > + bool mmu_page_tracking_enabled;
> > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV)
> > hpa_t hv_root_tdp;
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
> > index eb186bc57f6a9..955a5ae07b10e 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
> > @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ int kvm_page_track_init(struct kvm *kvm);
> > void kvm_page_track_cleanup(struct kvm *kvm);
> >
> > bool kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enabled(struct kvm *kvm);
> > +int kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enable(struct kvm *kvm);
> > int kvm_page_track_write_tracking_alloc(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot);
> >
> > void kvm_page_track_free_memslot(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot);
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> > index 671cfeccf04e9..44d15551f7156 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> > @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ int kvm_arch_write_log_dirty(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > int kvm_mmu_post_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
> > void kvm_mmu_pre_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
> >
> > -static inline bool kvm_shadow_root_allocated(struct kvm *kvm)
> > +static inline bool mmu_page_tracking_enabled(struct kvm *kvm)
> > {
> > /*
> > * Read shadow_root_allocated before related pointers. Hence, threads
> > @@ -277,9 +277,11 @@ static inline bool kvm_shadow_root_allocated(struct kvm *kvm)
> > * see the pointers. Pairs with smp_store_release in
> > * mmu_first_shadow_root_alloc.
> > */
>
> This comment also needs to be rewritten.
Also thanks a lot, next time I'll check comments better.
>
> > - return smp_load_acquire(&kvm->arch.shadow_root_allocated);
> > + return smp_load_acquire(&kvm->arch.mmu_page_tracking_enabled);
> > }
>
> ...
>
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
> > index 2e09d1b6249f3..8857d629036d7 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
> > @@ -21,10 +21,16 @@
> >
> > bool kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enabled(struct kvm *kvm)
>
> This can be static, it's now used only by page_track.c.
I'll fix this.
>
> > {
> > - return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_EXTERNAL_WRITE_TRACKING) ||
> > - !tdp_enabled || kvm_shadow_root_allocated(kvm);
> > + return mmu_page_tracking_enabled(kvm);
> > }
> >
> > +int kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enable(struct kvm *kvm)
>
> This is too similar to the "enabled" version; "kvm_page_track_enable_write_tracking()"
> would maintain namespacing and be less confusing.
Makes sense, thanks, will do!
>
> Hmm, I'd probably vote to make this a "static inline" in kvm_page_track.h, and
> rename mmu_enable_write_tracking() to kvm_mmu_enable_write_tracking and export.
> Not a strong preference, just feels silly to export a one-liner.
The sole reason I did it this way, because 'page_track.c' this way contains all the interfaces
that an external user of write tracking needs to use.
>
> > +{
> > + return mmu_enable_write_tracking(kvm);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enable);
> > +
> > +
> > void kvm_page_track_free_memslot(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> > {
> > int i;
> > --
> > 2.26.3
> >
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-22 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-27 20:02 [RFC PATCH v3 00/19] RFC: nested AVIC Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-27 20:02 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/19] KVM: x86: document AVIC/APICv inhibit reasons Maxim Levitsky
2022-05-18 15:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-18 17:13 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-27 20:02 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/19] KVM: x86: inhibit APICv/AVIC when the guest and/or host changes apic id/base from the defaults Maxim Levitsky
2022-05-18 8:28 ` Chao Gao
2022-05-18 9:50 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-05-18 11:51 ` Chao Gao
2022-05-18 12:36 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-05-18 15:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-18 17:15 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-05-19 16:06 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-22 9:03 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-05-22 14:47 ` Jim Mattson
2022-05-23 6:50 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-05-23 17:22 ` Jim Mattson
2022-05-23 17:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-23 9:44 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-27 20:02 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/19] KVM: x86: SVM: remove avic's broken code that updated APIC ID Maxim Levitsky
2022-05-19 16:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-22 9:01 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-05-23 17:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-27 20:02 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/19] KVM: x86: mmu: allow to enable write tracking externally Maxim Levitsky
2022-05-19 16:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-22 10:21 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2022-05-19 16:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-22 10:22 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-20 14:42 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-25 16:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-28 7:46 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-01 15:53 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-01 17:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-08 13:13 ` Nested AVIC design (was:Re: [RFC PATCH v3 04/19] KVM: x86: mmu: allow to enable write tracking externally) Maxim Levitsky
2022-09-29 22:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-03 7:27 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-11-10 0:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-27 20:03 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/19] x86: KVMGT: use kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enable Maxim Levitsky
2022-05-19 16:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-27 20:03 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/19] KVM: x86: mmu: add gfn_in_memslot helper Maxim Levitsky
2022-05-19 16:43 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-22 10:22 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-05-22 12:12 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-27 20:03 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/19] KVM: x86: mmu: tweak fast path for emulation of access to nested NPT pages Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-27 20:03 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/19] KVM: x86: SVM: move avic state to separate struct Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-27 20:03 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/19] KVM: x86: nSVM: add nested AVIC tracepoints Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-27 20:03 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/19] KVM: x86: nSVM: implement AVIC's physid/logid table access helpers Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-27 20:03 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/19] KVM: x86: nSVM: implement shadowing of AVIC's physical id table Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-27 20:03 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/19] KVM: x86: nSVM: make nested AVIC physid write tracking be aware of the host scheduling Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-27 20:03 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/19] KVM: x86: nSVM: wire nested AVIC to nested guest entry/exit Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-27 20:03 ` [RFC PATCH v3 14/19] KVM: x86: rename .set_apic_access_page_addr to reload_apic_access_page Maxim Levitsky
2022-05-19 16:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-22 10:22 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-27 20:03 ` [RFC PATCH v3 15/19] KVM: x86: nSVM: add code to reload AVIC physid table when it is invalidated Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-27 20:03 ` [RFC PATCH v3 16/19] KVM: x86: nSVM: implement support for nested AVIC vmexits Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-27 20:03 ` [RFC PATCH v3 17/19] KVM: x86: nSVM: implement nested AVIC doorbell emulation Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-27 20:03 ` [RFC PATCH v3 18/19] KVM: x86: SVM/nSVM: add optional non strict AVIC doorbell mode Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-27 20:03 ` [RFC PATCH v3 19/19] KVM: x86: nSVM: expose the nested AVIC to the guest Maxim Levitsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e79a98afda1920a3f8fadd13dc6a20ef2719eeb2.camel@redhat.com \
--to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).