Hi Am 25.07.22 um 17:46 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas: > On 7/20/22 16:27, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >> Replace the simple-KMS helpers with the regular atomic helpers. The >> regular helpers are better architectured and therefore allow for easier >> code sharing among drivers. No functional changes. >> > > Acked-by: Javier Martinez Canillas > > But I've a question below... > >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/simpledrm.c | 283 ++++++++++++++++++++----------- >> 1 file changed, 180 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-) > > [...] > >> +static void simpledrm_crtc_helper_atomic_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc, >> + struct drm_atomic_state *old_state) >> +{ >> + /* >> + * Always enabled; screen updates are performed by >> + * the primary plane's atomic_update function. >> + */ >> +} >> + >> +static void simpledrm_crtc_helper_atomic_disable(struct drm_crtc *crtc, >> + struct drm_atomic_state *old_state) >> +{ >> + /* >> + * Always enabled; disabling clears the screen in the >> + * primary plane's atomic_disable function. >> + */ >> +} > > ...do we really need to have these ? Can't we just not set them ? > >> + >> +static const struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs simpledrm_crtc_helper_funcs = { >> + .mode_valid = simpledrm_crtc_helper_mode_valid, >> + .atomic_check = simpledrm_crtc_helper_atomic_check, >> + .atomic_enable = simpledrm_crtc_helper_atomic_enable, >> + .atomic_disable = simpledrm_crtc_helper_atomic_disable, >> +}; >> + > looking at https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/include/drm/drm_modeset_helper_vtables.h#L703 > that says the .atomic_{en,dis}able handlers are optional. > The code also looks like we don't need the helpers. I mostly added them for the comments they contain, but I can also add those next to simpledrm_crtc_helper_funcs. Best regards Thomas -- Thomas Zimmermann Graphics Driver Developer SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg) Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev