From: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com>
To: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Arvind Yadav" <Arvind.Yadav@amd.com>,
shashank.sharma@amd.com, amaranath.somalapuram@amd.com,
Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com, sumit.semwal@linaro.org,
gustavo@padovan.org, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/sched: Enable signaling for finished fence
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 12:18:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f905c70e-b93d-5a26-cba9-c826a1fc21fe@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b57b254-8d67-9937-5cec-783e7a4d8f56@amd.com>
On 2022-09-07 02:37, Christian König wrote:
> Am 06.09.22 um 21:55 schrieb Andrey Grodzovsky:
>>
>> On 2022-09-06 02:34, Christian König wrote:
>>> Am 05.09.22 um 18:34 schrieb Arvind Yadav:
>>>> Here's enabling software signaling for finished fence.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <Arvind.Yadav@amd.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v1 :
>>>> 1- Addressing Christian's comment to remove CONFIG_DEBUG_FS check from
>>>> this patch.
>>>> 2- The version of this patch is also changed and previously
>>>> it was [PATCH 2/4]
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 2 ++
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>>> index e0ab14e0fb6b..fe72de0e2911 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>>> @@ -962,6 +962,8 @@ static int drm_sched_main(void *param)
>>>> /* Drop for original kref_init of the fence */
>>>> dma_fence_put(fence);
>>>> + dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling(&s_fence->finished);
>>>
>>> Ok, this makes it a lot clearer. Previously I though that we have
>>> some bug in dma_fence_add_callback().
>>>
>>> This is essentially the wrong place to call this, the finished fence
>>> should be enabled by the caller and not here.
>>>
>>> There is also another problem in dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling(), it
>>> returns early when the fence is already signaled:
>>>
>>> if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->flags))
>>> return;
>>>
>>> Please remove that one first.
>>
>>
>> Why we even need this explicit call if dma_fence_add_callback calls
>> __dma_fence_enable_signaling anyway ?
>
> Two different fence objects.
>
> The dma_fence_add_callback() is done on the hw fence we get in return
> of submitting the job.
>
> The dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling() here is done on the finished fence
> we use to signal the completion externally.
>
> Key point is the finished fence should be used by the frontend drivers
> which uses the scheduler and not by the scheduler itself.
>
> Christian.
Oh, so we need to explicitly call this because dma_fence_add_callback is
not always used for finished fence right ?
Yea, then it makes sense that the client needs to manage this since each
one has his own logic what to do with it.
Andrey
>
>>
>> Andrey
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Christian.
>>>
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> r = dma_fence_add_callback(fence, &sched_job->cb,
>>>> drm_sched_job_done_cb);
>>>> if (r == -ENOENT)
>>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-07 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-05 16:34 [PATCH v2 0/4] dma-buf: To check enable signaling before signaled Arvind Yadav
2022-09-05 16:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/sched: Enable signaling for finished fence Arvind Yadav
2022-09-06 6:34 ` Christian König
2022-09-06 19:55 ` Andrey Grodzovsky
2022-09-07 6:37 ` Christian König
2022-09-07 16:18 ` Andrey Grodzovsky [this message]
2022-09-05 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] dma-buf: enable signaling for the stub fence on debug Arvind Yadav
2022-09-06 7:09 ` Christian König
2022-09-09 16:32 ` Yadav, Arvind
2022-09-05 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] dma-buf: enable signaling for selftest " Arvind Yadav
2022-09-06 7:11 ` Christian König
2022-09-05 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] dma-buf: Check status of enable-signaling bit " Arvind Yadav
2022-09-06 8:39 ` Christian König
2022-09-06 10:20 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-09-06 10:43 ` Christian König
2022-09-06 11:21 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-09-06 11:35 ` Christian König
2022-09-06 11:38 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f905c70e-b93d-5a26-cba9-c826a1fc21fe@amd.com \
--to=andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com \
--cc=Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com \
--cc=Arvind.Yadav@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=amaranath.somalapuram@amd.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shashank.sharma@amd.com \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).