dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/tegra: Add zpos property for cursor planes
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 20:14:06 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fcb11625-b17c-752b-de12-29f916ade7cb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200617163724.GA3547875@ulmo>

17.06.2020 19:37, Thierry Reding пишет:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 05:20:14PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 17.06.2020 17:10, Thierry Reding пишет:
>>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 09:39:19PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>> 16.06.2020 21:14, Thierry Reding пишет:
>>>>> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> As of commit 4dc55525b095 ("drm: plane: Verify that no or all planes
>>>>> have a zpos property") a warning is emitted if there's a mix of planes
>>>>> with and without a zpos property.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tegra, cursor planes are always composited on top of all other
>>>>> planes, which is why they never had a zpos property attached to them.
>>>>> However, since the composition order is fixed, this is trivial to
>>>>> remedy by simply attaching an immutable zpos property to them.
>>>>>
>>>>> v3: do not hardcode zpos for overlay planes used as cursor (Dmitry)
>>>>> v2: hardcode cursor plane zpos to 255 instead of 0 (Ville)
>>>>>
>>>>> Reported-by: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c | 1 +
>>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c
>>>>> index 83f31c6e891c..04d6848d19fc 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c
>>>>> @@ -957,6 +957,7 @@ static struct drm_plane *tegra_dc_cursor_plane_create(struct drm_device *drm,
>>>>>  	}
>>>>>  
>>>>>  	drm_plane_helper_add(&plane->base, &tegra_cursor_plane_helper_funcs);
>>>>> +	drm_plane_create_zpos_immutable_property(&plane->base, 255);
>>>>>  
>>>>>  	return &plane->base;
>>>>>  }
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Looks nice, thanks! Since you dropped all other zpos changes for other
>>>> planes and given that the other planes have 255 for the max zpos, what
>>>> about to set the cursor's zpos to 256?
>>>
>>> I'd prefer to have all of the planes' zpos within the same range. By
>>> default the other planes will be on the very bottom end of that range
>>> and the atomic core will normalize the zpos for all planes anyway, so
>>> the cursor plane will end up with a very small normalized zpos in the
>>> end.
>>>
>>> The zpos documentation already mentions that the behaviour is undefined
>>> if two planes have the same zpos value, so I think userspace is going to
>>> know how to set these anyway.
>>>
>>> It might be worth to do a follow-up patch that is smarter about setting
>>> the range of valid values. 0-255 is true on later chips where we
>>> actually have a proper "layer depth" register field and I wanted this to
>>> be uniform across all generations. Other drivers seem to set the upper
>>> limit on the zpos range to be equal to the number of planes available,
>>> so that there aren't potentially big gaps in the numbering. That said,
>>> since the core already normalizes the zpos for us, I don't see a big
>>> benefit in explicitly clipping the range.
>>
>> But the cursor plane doesn't use the "layer depth" register, doesn't it?
>> So the zpos over 255 shouldn't matter in this case.
>>
>> I know that DRM should normalizes the given zpos, but still it makes me
>> a bit uncomfortable knowing that there are the ranges overlap visible to
>> userspace :)
> 
> Userspace has to be able to deal with this anyway because it can't make
> any assumptions about what hardware supports underneath. A cursor on a
> different platform may very well be stackable anywhere in the layout so
> it must ensure that the cursor always has the highest zpos (provided
> that that's what it wants). Immutable 255 basically just says that the
> cursor is always going to be at the top. /If/ userspace then decides to
> set some other plane's zpos = 255, then we're in the "undefined"
> behaviour case that the documentation mentions, in which case the
> behaviour on Tegra would still be sane in showing the cursor on top.
> 
> So I don't think there's really an issue with the overlap.

It should work okay, but if cursor had zpos set to 256 then it would
lower the chance for userspace to create the undefined behavior situation.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

      reply	other threads:[~2020-06-18  7:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-16 18:14 [PATCH v3] drm/tegra: Add zpos property for cursor planes Thierry Reding
2020-06-16 18:39 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-06-17 14:10   ` Thierry Reding
2020-06-17 14:20     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-06-17 16:37       ` Thierry Reding
2020-06-17 17:14         ` Dmitry Osipenko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fcb11625-b17c-752b-de12-29f916ade7cb@gmail.com \
    --to=digetx@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).