From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Frank Wunderlich" Subject: Aw: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/mediatek: Add Mediatek framebuffer device Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 13:33:59 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20190116013924.11345-1-ck.hu@mediatek.com> <20190116013924.11345-2-ck.hu@mediatek.com> <1547775975.4221.11.camel@mtksdaap41> <74eba84d-4686-698a-6100-d72dabd15a21@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <74eba84d-4686-698a-6100-d72dabd15a21@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Matthias Brugger Cc: CK Hu , Daniel Vetter , srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, David Airlie , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=22Noralf_Tr=EF=BF=BDnnes=22?= , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Philipp Zabel , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org I have tested same codebase where my FBDev-Patch works (4.20-hdmiv5), only without it and CK Hu's 2 Patches does generic fbdev depend on the mmsys-Patch? regards Frank > Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Januar 2019 um 09:39 Uhr > Von: "Matthias Brugger" > may it be the not yet fixed mmsys compatible problem? > Frank, did you test with my last series [1]? > > Regards, > Matthias > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10686345/