On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:22:14 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Is this one intentionally not in or did it slip through? I thought I had replied to that -- it doesn't apply to either -fixes or -next at this point. I can try to fix it, but I'd prefer it if you'd figure out how things have changed and re-test a modified version. Sorry for not pinging you when I didn't hear back. -- keith.packard@intel.com