From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Subject: Re: [PULL] drm-intel-next
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:04:23 -0700
Message-ID: <yunk4bm9hw8.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
References: <yunoc0y9lte.fsf@aiko.keithp.com> <20110713172214.GA16594@pengutronix.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110713172214.GA16594@pengutronix.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Intel drivers <Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:22:14 +0200, Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de> wr=
ote:

> Is this one intentionally not in or did it slip through?

I thought I had replied to that -- it doesn't apply to either -fixes or
=2Dnext at this point. I can try to fix it, but I'd prefer it if you'd
figure out how things have changed and re-test a modified version.

Sorry for not pinging you when I didn't hear back.

=2D-=20
keith.packard@intel.com

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFOHd4nQp8BWwlsTdMRApOOAKDRS1BGV4qbwIQhOjfQXyiJc8M4+QCgoi6z
R/mmhdB0ky5mY0mB1hNdwxs=
=TwP9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--