DriverDev-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] staging: wfx: Make some functions static
  2019-10-09 13:50 [PATCH v2 0/3] staging: wfx: Make some functions static zhengbin
@ 2019-10-09 13:47 ` Dan Carpenter
  2019-10-09 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] staging: wfx: Make function 'sram_write_dma_safe', 'load_firmware_secure' static zhengbin
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2019-10-09 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: zhengbin; +Cc: devel, gregkh

Thanks!

regars,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 0/3] staging: wfx: Make some functions static
@ 2019-10-09 13:50 zhengbin
  2019-10-09 13:47 ` Dan Carpenter
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: zhengbin @ 2019-10-09 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jerome.pouiller, gregkh, dan.carpenter, devel; +Cc: zhengbin13

v1->v2: keep the declaration style consistent within the file

zhengbin (3):
  staging: wfx: Make function
    'sram_write_dma_safe','load_firmware_secure' static
  staging: wfx: Make function 'wfx_tx_queue_get' static
  staging: wfx: Make some functions static in sta.c

 drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c  |  5 +++--
 drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c |  4 +++-
 drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c   | 16 ++++++++--------
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 1/3] staging: wfx: Make function 'sram_write_dma_safe', 'load_firmware_secure' static
  2019-10-09 13:50 [PATCH v2 0/3] staging: wfx: Make some functions static zhengbin
  2019-10-09 13:47 ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2019-10-09 13:50 ` zhengbin
  2019-10-09 14:04   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] staging: wfx: Make function 'sram_write_dma_safe','load_firmware_secure' static Jerome Pouiller
  2019-10-09 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] staging: wfx: Make function 'wfx_tx_queue_get' static zhengbin
  2019-10-09 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] staging: wfx: Make some functions static in sta.c zhengbin
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: zhengbin @ 2019-10-09 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jerome.pouiller, gregkh, dan.carpenter, devel; +Cc: zhengbin13

Fix sparse warnings:

drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c:83:5: warning: symbol 'sram_write_dma_safe' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c:229:5: warning: symbol 'load_firmware_secure' was not declared. Should it be static?

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
index 8fb4a9f..6d82c62 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
@@ -80,7 +80,8 @@ static const char * const fwio_error_strings[] = {
  * NOTE: it may also be possible to use 'pages' from struct firmware and avoid
  * bounce buffer
  */
-int sram_write_dma_safe(struct wfx_dev *wdev, u32 addr, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
+static int sram_write_dma_safe(struct wfx_dev *wdev, u32 addr, const u8 *buf,
+			       size_t len)
 {
 	int ret;
 	const u8 *tmp;
@@ -226,7 +227,7 @@ static void print_boot_status(struct wfx_dev *wdev)
 	}
 }

-int load_firmware_secure(struct wfx_dev *wdev)
+static int load_firmware_secure(struct wfx_dev *wdev)
 {
 	const struct firmware *fw = NULL;
 	int header_size;
--
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] staging: wfx: Make function 'wfx_tx_queue_get' static
  2019-10-09 13:50 [PATCH v2 0/3] staging: wfx: Make some functions static zhengbin
  2019-10-09 13:47 ` Dan Carpenter
  2019-10-09 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] staging: wfx: Make function 'sram_write_dma_safe', 'load_firmware_secure' static zhengbin
@ 2019-10-09 13:50 ` zhengbin
  2019-10-09 14:05   ` Jerome Pouiller
  2019-10-09 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] staging: wfx: Make some functions static in sta.c zhengbin
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: zhengbin @ 2019-10-09 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jerome.pouiller, gregkh, dan.carpenter, devel; +Cc: zhengbin13

Fix sparse warnings:

drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c:218:16: warning: symbol 'wfx_tx_queue_get' was not declared. Should it be static?

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c
index 6f1be4f..c44ffdf 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c
@@ -215,7 +215,9 @@ void wfx_tx_queue_put(struct wfx_dev *wdev, struct wfx_queue *queue, struct sk_b
 	spin_unlock_bh(&queue->queue.lock);
 }

-struct sk_buff *wfx_tx_queue_get(struct wfx_dev *wdev, struct wfx_queue *queue, u32 link_id_map)
+static struct sk_buff *wfx_tx_queue_get(struct wfx_dev *wdev,
+					struct wfx_queue *queue,
+					u32 link_id_map)
 {
 	struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
 	struct sk_buff *item;
--
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 3/3] staging: wfx: Make some functions static in sta.c
  2019-10-09 13:50 [PATCH v2 0/3] staging: wfx: Make some functions static zhengbin
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2019-10-09 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] staging: wfx: Make function 'wfx_tx_queue_get' static zhengbin
@ 2019-10-09 13:50 ` zhengbin
  2019-10-09 14:05   ` Jerome Pouiller
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: zhengbin @ 2019-10-09 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jerome.pouiller, gregkh, dan.carpenter, devel; +Cc: zhengbin13

Fix sparse warnings:

drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:269:6: warning: symbol 'wfx_update_filtering_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:475:6: warning: symbol 'wfx_event_handler_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:521:6: warning: symbol 'wfx_bss_loss_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:528:6: warning: symbol 'wfx_bss_params_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:539:6: warning: symbol 'wfx_set_beacon_wakeup_period_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:732:6: warning: symbol 'wfx_unjoin_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:794:6: warning: symbol 'wfx_set_cts_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:1234:6: warning: symbol 'wfx_set_tim_work' was not declared. Should it be static?

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c
index 2855d14..d19bab6 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ void wfx_update_filtering(struct wfx_vif *wvif)
 	kfree(bf_tbl);
 }

-void wfx_update_filtering_work(struct work_struct *work)
+static void wfx_update_filtering_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct wfx_vif *wvif = container_of(work, struct wfx_vif, update_filtering_work);

@@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ static void wfx_event_report_rssi(struct wfx_vif *wvif, uint8_t raw_rcpi_rssi)
 	ieee80211_cqm_rssi_notify(wvif->vif, cqm_evt, rcpi_rssi, GFP_KERNEL);
 }

-void wfx_event_handler_work(struct work_struct *work)
+static void wfx_event_handler_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct wfx_vif *wvif =
 		container_of(work, struct wfx_vif, event_handler_work);
@@ -521,14 +521,14 @@ void wfx_event_handler_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	__wfx_free_event_queue(&list);
 }

-void wfx_bss_loss_work(struct work_struct *work)
+static void wfx_bss_loss_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct wfx_vif *wvif = container_of(work, struct wfx_vif, bss_loss_work.work);

 	ieee80211_connection_loss(wvif->vif);
 }

-void wfx_bss_params_work(struct work_struct *work)
+static void wfx_bss_params_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct wfx_vif *wvif = container_of(work, struct wfx_vif, bss_params_work);

@@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ void wfx_bss_params_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	mutex_unlock(&wvif->wdev->conf_mutex);
 }

-void wfx_set_beacon_wakeup_period_work(struct work_struct *work)
+static void wfx_set_beacon_wakeup_period_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct wfx_vif *wvif = container_of(work, struct wfx_vif, set_beacon_wakeup_period_work);

@@ -732,7 +732,7 @@ static void wfx_do_join(struct wfx_vif *wvif)
 		cfg80211_put_bss(wvif->wdev->hw->wiphy, bss);
 }

-void wfx_unjoin_work(struct work_struct *work)
+static void wfx_unjoin_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct wfx_vif *wvif = container_of(work, struct wfx_vif, unjoin_work);

@@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ int wfx_sta_remove(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
 	return 0;
 }

-void wfx_set_cts_work(struct work_struct *work)
+static void wfx_set_cts_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct wfx_vif *wvif = container_of(work, struct wfx_vif, set_cts_work);
 	u8 erp_ie[3] = { WLAN_EID_ERP_INFO, 1, 0 };
@@ -1234,7 +1234,7 @@ static int wfx_set_tim_impl(struct wfx_vif *wvif, bool aid0_bit_set)
 	return 0;
 }

-void wfx_set_tim_work(struct work_struct *work)
+static void wfx_set_tim_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct wfx_vif *wvif = container_of(work, struct wfx_vif, set_tim_work);

--
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] staging: wfx: Make function 'sram_write_dma_safe','load_firmware_secure' static
  2019-10-09 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] staging: wfx: Make function 'sram_write_dma_safe', 'load_firmware_secure' static zhengbin
@ 2019-10-09 14:04   ` Jerome Pouiller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jerome Pouiller @ 2019-10-09 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: zhengbin; +Cc: devel, gregkh, dan.carpenter

On Wednesday 9 October 2019 15:43:31 CEST zhengbin wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
> 
> 
> Fix sparse warnings:
> 
> drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c:83:5: warning: symbol 'sram_write_dma_safe' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c:229:5: warning: symbol 'load_firmware_secure' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
> index 8fb4a9f..6d82c62 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
> @@ -80,7 +80,8 @@ static const char * const fwio_error_strings[] = {
>   * NOTE: it may also be possible to use 'pages' from struct firmware and avoid
>   * bounce buffer
>   */
> -int sram_write_dma_safe(struct wfx_dev *wdev, u32 addr, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
> +static int sram_write_dma_safe(struct wfx_dev *wdev, u32 addr, const u8 *buf,
> +                              size_t len)
>  {
>         int ret;
>         const u8 *tmp;
> @@ -226,7 +227,7 @@ static void print_boot_status(struct wfx_dev *wdev)
>         }
>  }
> 
> -int load_firmware_secure(struct wfx_dev *wdev)
> +static int load_firmware_secure(struct wfx_dev *wdev)
>  {
>         const struct firmware *fw = NULL;
>         int header_size;
> --
> 2.7.4
> 

Reviewed-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com>

-- 
Jérôme Pouiller

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] staging: wfx: Make function 'wfx_tx_queue_get' static
  2019-10-09 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] staging: wfx: Make function 'wfx_tx_queue_get' static zhengbin
@ 2019-10-09 14:05   ` Jerome Pouiller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jerome Pouiller @ 2019-10-09 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: zhengbin; +Cc: devel, gregkh, dan.carpenter

On Wednesday 9 October 2019 15:43:35 CEST zhengbin wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
> 
> 
> Fix sparse warnings:
> 
> drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c:218:16: warning: symbol 'wfx_tx_queue_get' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c
> index 6f1be4f..c44ffdf 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c
> @@ -215,7 +215,9 @@ void wfx_tx_queue_put(struct wfx_dev *wdev, struct wfx_queue *queue, struct sk_b
>         spin_unlock_bh(&queue->queue.lock);
>  }
> 
> -struct sk_buff *wfx_tx_queue_get(struct wfx_dev *wdev, struct wfx_queue *queue, u32 link_id_map)
> +static struct sk_buff *wfx_tx_queue_get(struct wfx_dev *wdev,
> +                                       struct wfx_queue *queue,
> +                                       u32 link_id_map)
>  {
>         struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
>         struct sk_buff *item;
> --
> 2.7.4
> 

Reviewed-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com>

-- 
Jérôme Pouiller

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] staging: wfx: Make some functions static in sta.c
  2019-10-09 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] staging: wfx: Make some functions static in sta.c zhengbin
@ 2019-10-09 14:05   ` Jerome Pouiller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jerome Pouiller @ 2019-10-09 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: zhengbin; +Cc: devel, gregkh, dan.carpenter

On Wednesday 9 October 2019 15:43:35 CEST zhengbin wrote:
> Fix sparse warnings:
> 
> drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:269:6: warning: symbol 'wfx_update_filtering_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:475:6: warning: symbol 'wfx_event_handler_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:521:6: warning: symbol 'wfx_bss_loss_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:528:6: warning: symbol 'wfx_bss_params_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:539:6: warning: symbol 'wfx_set_beacon_wakeup_period_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:732:6: warning: symbol 'wfx_unjoin_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:794:6: warning: symbol 'wfx_set_cts_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:1234:6: warning: symbol 'wfx_set_tim_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c
> index 2855d14..d19bab6 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c
> @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ void wfx_update_filtering(struct wfx_vif *wvif)
>         kfree(bf_tbl);
>  }
> 
> -void wfx_update_filtering_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +static void wfx_update_filtering_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>         struct wfx_vif *wvif = container_of(work, struct wfx_vif, update_filtering_work);
> 
> @@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ static void wfx_event_report_rssi(struct wfx_vif *wvif, uint8_t raw_rcpi_rssi)
>         ieee80211_cqm_rssi_notify(wvif->vif, cqm_evt, rcpi_rssi, GFP_KERNEL);
>  }
> 
> -void wfx_event_handler_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +static void wfx_event_handler_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>         struct wfx_vif *wvif =
>                 container_of(work, struct wfx_vif, event_handler_work);
> @@ -521,14 +521,14 @@ void wfx_event_handler_work(struct work_struct *work)
>         __wfx_free_event_queue(&list);
>  }
> 
> -void wfx_bss_loss_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +static void wfx_bss_loss_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>         struct wfx_vif *wvif = container_of(work, struct wfx_vif, bss_loss_work.work);
> 
>         ieee80211_connection_loss(wvif->vif);
>  }
> 
> -void wfx_bss_params_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +static void wfx_bss_params_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>         struct wfx_vif *wvif = container_of(work, struct wfx_vif, bss_params_work);
> 
> @@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ void wfx_bss_params_work(struct work_struct *work)
>         mutex_unlock(&wvif->wdev->conf_mutex);
>  }
> 
> -void wfx_set_beacon_wakeup_period_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +static void wfx_set_beacon_wakeup_period_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>         struct wfx_vif *wvif = container_of(work, struct wfx_vif, set_beacon_wakeup_period_work);
> 
> @@ -732,7 +732,7 @@ static void wfx_do_join(struct wfx_vif *wvif)
>                 cfg80211_put_bss(wvif->wdev->hw->wiphy, bss);
>  }
> 
> -void wfx_unjoin_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +static void wfx_unjoin_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>         struct wfx_vif *wvif = container_of(work, struct wfx_vif, unjoin_work);
> 
> @@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ int wfx_sta_remove(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
>         return 0;
>  }
> 
> -void wfx_set_cts_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +static void wfx_set_cts_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>         struct wfx_vif *wvif = container_of(work, struct wfx_vif, set_cts_work);
>         u8 erp_ie[3] = { WLAN_EID_ERP_INFO, 1, 0 };
> @@ -1234,7 +1234,7 @@ static int wfx_set_tim_impl(struct wfx_vif *wvif, bool aid0_bit_set)
>         return 0;
>  }
> 
> -void wfx_set_tim_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +static void wfx_set_tim_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>         struct wfx_vif *wvif = container_of(work, struct wfx_vif, set_tim_work);
> 
> --
> 2.7.4
> 

Reviewed-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com>

-- 
Jérôme Pouiller

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, back to index

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-10-09 13:50 [PATCH v2 0/3] staging: wfx: Make some functions static zhengbin
2019-10-09 13:47 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-10-09 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] staging: wfx: Make function 'sram_write_dma_safe', 'load_firmware_secure' static zhengbin
2019-10-09 14:04   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] staging: wfx: Make function 'sram_write_dma_safe','load_firmware_secure' static Jerome Pouiller
2019-10-09 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] staging: wfx: Make function 'wfx_tx_queue_get' static zhengbin
2019-10-09 14:05   ` Jerome Pouiller
2019-10-09 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] staging: wfx: Make some functions static in sta.c zhengbin
2019-10-09 14:05   ` Jerome Pouiller

DriverDev-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/driverdev-devel/0 driverdev-devel/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 driverdev-devel driverdev-devel/ https://lore.kernel.org/driverdev-devel \
		driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org devel@driverdev.osuosl.org driverdev-devel@archiver.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index driverdev-devel

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.linuxdriverproject.driverdev-devel


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox