On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 02:44:15AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
[...]
> +static void tegra_pwm_deinit_opp_table(void *data)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = data;
> +	struct opp_table *opp_table;
> +
> +	opp_table = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table(dev);
> +	dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
> +	dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(opp_table);
> +	dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(opp_table);
> +}
> +
> +static int devm_tegra_pwm_init_opp_table(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct opp_table *opp_table;
> +	const char *rname = "core";
> +	int err;
> +
> +	/* voltage scaling is optional */
> +	if (device_property_present(dev, "core-supply"))
> +		opp_table = dev_pm_opp_set_regulators(dev, &rname, 1);
> +	else
> +		opp_table = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table(dev);
> +
> +	if (IS_ERR(opp_table))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(opp_table),
> +				     "failed to prepare OPP table\n");
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * OPP table presence is optional and we want the set_rate() of OPP
> +	 * API to work similarly to clk_set_rate() if table is missing in a
> +	 * device-tree.  The add_table() errors out if OPP is missing in DT.
> +	 */
> +	if (device_property_present(dev, "operating-points-v2")) {
> +		err = dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(dev);
> +		if (err) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to add OPP table: %d\n", err);
> +			goto put_table;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	err = devm_add_action(dev, tegra_pwm_deinit_opp_table, dev);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto remove_table;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +remove_table:
> +	dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
> +put_table:
> +	dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(opp_table);
> +
> +	return err;
> +}

These two functions seem to be heavily boilerplate across all these
drivers. Have you considered splitting these out into separate helpers?

Thierry