From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82720FA3728 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 21:53:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B2A421925 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 21:53:56 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5B2A421925 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=vt.edu Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=driverdev-devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4719B88516; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 21:53:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8MERmC2zNMZD; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 21:53:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A808851D; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 21:53:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56751BF9BD for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 21:53:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C9D88466 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 21:53:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nilhmy2gbP7Y for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 21:53:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from omr1.cc.vt.edu (outbound.smtp.vt.edu [198.82.183.121]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25BB58851D for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 21:53:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr3.cc.vt.edu (mr3.cc.ipv6.vt.edu [IPv6:2607:b400:92:8500:0:7f:b804:6b0a]) by omr1.cc.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x9GLrq0N014111 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 17:53:52 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f200.google.com (mail-qk1-f200.google.com [209.85.222.200]) by mr3.cc.vt.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x9GLrkNW023315 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 17:53:51 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f200.google.com with SMTP id x77so92045qka.11 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:53:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:date:message-id; bh=gqUpgmdxzpasd7pMU+uxnneMl1+ktu9g6I4Qah8EhxI=; b=NXRSE3EhpelcRdFP2Yy8In7q81FolfdhqYG/NpDU06OTdpYG9Fqle1LAZ/yI0b2scB zHZXdKu2Eo84DaOQHOcUlLcIouEzKUQsVua7chJzTBlug2+3pUqRFS2zrp8GMXeOWmAi n5sK39EOcz86lRcDUdPNPgkLYvaKasbKTPNc12wC8vdXIVwo893Cv4seV258hNDErQJp zlaYuxmtLwCnPPfyCzbnic4bOBpiffuDwygbaYOmeQgctp0gBn5NXDImkrrM7jxsEk5K s0alcFp68+okC7HZYwaK7Tl2dEPn5iJKIaDzYccrcBNbOmL327asiyKPKR4AOxFfXmVx dWSA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWnJ6tSBS19F7WVV4v8YsaNmS+lOxWSEaUVfPLj3fiLjmfaGrcs NKuxu4SMfsnsBbTjkYTriXyajmZCwqkT/d7qzBcTuZRoKhfwxZ597UMQoPZc92zr5++KDm6HaQI iCBCnU2X/MzkAKMtv+6AJBQjL7nvdePA1 X-Received: by 2002:ac8:24d4:: with SMTP id t20mr347277qtt.114.1571262826689; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:53:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzpCWG1Ma5xOzqYk3ZIkraUe0CS6rlGbWN/U3tPDHeSWZQKr532KeiINo5Te24b9bVE4E5nZA== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:24d4:: with SMTP id t20mr347249qtt.114.1571262826283; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:53:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from turing-police ([2601:5c0:c001:4341::9ca]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a9sm79794qkb.94.2019.10.16.14.53.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:53:44 -0700 (PDT) From: "Valdis Kl=?utf-8?Q?=c4=93?=tnieks" X-Google-Original-From: "Valdis Kl=?utf-8?Q?=c4=93?=tnieks" X-Mailer: exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018 with nmh-1.7+dev To: Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: exfat: add exfat filesystem code to staging In-Reply-To: <20191016203317.GU31224@sasha-vm> References: <20190828160817.6250-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> <20190829205631.uhz6jdboneej3j3c@pali> <184209.1567120696@turing-police> <20190829233506.GT5281@sasha-vm> <20190830075647.wvhrx4asnkrfkkwk@pali> <20191016140353.4hrncxa5wkx47oau@pali> <20191016143113.GS31224@sasha-vm> <20191016160349.pwghlg566hh2o7id@pali> <20191016203317.GU31224@sasha-vm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 17:53:43 -0400 Message-ID: <207853.1571262823@turing-police> X-BeenThere: driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Driver Project Developer List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Christoph Hellwig , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sasha Levin , Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5147566427650505454==" Errors-To: driverdev-devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org Sender: "devel" --===============5147566427650505454== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1571262823_33600P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --==_Exmh_1571262823_33600P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 16:33:17 -0400, Sasha Levin said: > It looks like the reason this wasn't made public along with the exFAT > spec is that TexFAT is pretty much dead - it's old, there are no users > we are aware of, and digging it out of it's grave to make it public is > actually quite the headache. Ahh.. For some reason I had convinced myself that base exfat implementati= ons used at least the 'keep a backup FAT' part of TexFAT, because on a teraby= te external USB drive, losing the FAT would be painful. But if Windows 10 d= oesn't do that either, then it's no great sin for Linux to not do it (and may ca= use problems if Linux says =22currently using FAT 2=22, and the disk is next = used on a Windows 10 box that only looks at FAT 1....) --==_Exmh_1571262823_33600P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018 iQIVAwUBXaeRZgdmEQWDXROgAQJPCA//crwtbuFdEHDJcuk9rjqzuC30MRUzo20V 1S7m1bIEl21fh/qg/JhUagKwHZxImRyN3u5Jy+J5iiq3zpQzAIGxRhqYX3e+6ykB b+/DlAUjv0S8YNpqDpqsYaafnCOsc0omfbYNPfxFGZWOyJWdsP+II3DsxUGTKyui TaQXR9s0ErjATdZ0kWr72Ap5HcrQ4ixI+poANMobYyq/k9Pjw50oyGCvJR2ErZSw B9Sm246KwHBFzwSDXrxbLggNx5+uE0B7/nvMPYzSrBBeqmvDxTcOSAygfwQSK0UT FvLmHIJiGkYHpFIY7zwa0Fs55nexKj4Rz+Uy8e05aohAOBGOTV9QxkcCSJhIf/Zw h9KZ2tyMcsXsDOh/0lGR8DCGxCE6sqo3KK7kuxPnAzNTbh9wli98tX3sQacr0E4D HhUYTGfeOaP12qa3ije8SZRo1yqdxs3KIyQtRhNWWZaIYL84BtFo8G4d1RSts/AH t+rkhtsmEytHdFY32qYMkD2NSCU3FOaM90Zz/zWBr5rMIhiw1WIySVH6P1ZOr1U6 C1+TtuMeV9g1SS80ik35GX4h5wYeEWXr/vrBD8mw2HSfj78lin2d0aLAxnaHEc+H wmfB72ECZ9Mq6SKblhcvRqhpNBHsX7WiLj1hVE8HSxufaEfT0A3Iz1Y8+oQKbX7I 8etTqEg46ZI= =oSaw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1571262823_33600P-- --===============5147566427650505454== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel --===============5147566427650505454==--