From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 439D5C43461 for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 14:07:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2667961209 for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 14:07:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1349798AbhEROJO (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 May 2021 10:09:14 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f44.google.com ([209.85.221.44]:41675 "EHLO mail-wr1-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1349797AbhEROJM (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 May 2021 10:09:12 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f44.google.com with SMTP id d11so10377813wrw.8 for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 07:07:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=Lyn+GgfBHEIpdulB3Ve3nVUh8ILqBghcjEz9FXoWM8E=; b=bAkasyXTLAojS+ly3/sfbwqdapislN9p1WG4JHOSh08ce4Amslz9O1sdFHi19Ub0un 2CkiohqGYS8XEj7IwVrJnZR3/zVTBausklNUC6SH918OJCOcD/QFPGUvMGT+y0bPXHsj 3+qIz5sHcD8jtLro24gVxYhe/Y254CPNeWfez1fffcb9V+aqJvBDJuEpZmi8MYXsyFuu Oo3Qw/pAlzv/UK10n0xnRr5AKY/Du46i0a7plPkG0wL1geDa18Klj+1/IMdckFWLBRp+ S30McyUvRXr+aHGJfgMBTxaIuuJbP/of8NEGDgSOaHQwzwrAM8GRLp+3kQWJcnbPaya3 iMTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530yYFlVxSG1ehpsl7mSPaCHx58zb8EHWlzyRo/NpAmu6fxqeI5z XCAYjGPi2BfHNWUaO6UA9Kk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxf5XfiXCALZqBxOBuaDEERVCN8zyMiMF9XRL5cn+XULzFlYk5hXsnXkqzt0ACaNuHiYtB/nA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:500b:: with SMTP id e11mr7274890wrt.209.1621346873323; Tue, 18 May 2021 07:07:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a01:4b00:f41a:3600:360b:9754:2e3a:c344]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y2sm3230228wmq.45.2021.05.18.07.07.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 18 May 2021 07:07:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <056f75e00fe796e3a9d634ec03afdf0a416fd9a0.camel@debian.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH dwarves v3] libbpf: allow to use packaged version From: Luca Boccassi To: Dominique Martinet , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: dwarves@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 15:07:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20210104221622.256663-1-bluca@debian.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-7cNmpc9y6m8yH9KN906l" User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: dwarves@vger.kernel.org --=-7cNmpc9y6m8yH9KN906l Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2021-04-13 at 14:42 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Wed, 2021-03-31 at 10:05 +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote: > > Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote on Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 12:12:07PM -0300= : > > > > I can understand reverting due to other pressure to get a release o= ut > > > > but most distros (including fedora) frown upon vendoring code so I = think > > > > it would be good to have back ultimately. > > > >=20 > > > > Did you or someone else (Luca?) ever take the time to look at it? > > >=20 > > > Not yet, I'm right now working on it, testing patches to support clan= g's > > > thin-LTO being used to build the kernel, so busy with it. > >=20 > > Thanks > >=20 > >=20 > > > > I don't see what would be so different with fedora to make this > > > > unfixable, I'd be happy taking a look if nobody has so far. > > >=20 > > > Please do. > >=20 > > As said in my previous mail (in reply to Luca's), I cannot reproduce on > > fedora 33 so I'm not sure where to look at. > > Was the problem specific to one architecture (I only tried x86_64), or > > maybe the build dir was tainted by a previous run of cmake with another > > version of the patch? (if rpmbuild, build dir somehow included in the > > tarball?) > >=20 > > Looking at the timing the libbpf version should have been identical but > > it's possible that system wasn't up to date or some other version chang= e > > since Feb? > >=20 > > Either way I would appreciate if you could confirm you still have the > > problem when you have a moment, and if so provide a bit more details on > > your setup. > >=20 > >=20 > > > > Would you take the patch back in if I somehow fix rpmbuild with a l= ibbpf > > > > package installed on fedora33? > > >=20 > > > Sure. I had it merged, as, IIRC, it was a opt-in procedure. > >=20 > > Yes, strictly opt-in and shouldn't affect developers or people building > > from git without explicitly requiring to use the system's version. > >=20 >=20 > Hello Arnaldo, >=20 > Any update on this? >=20 > Thanks! Gentle ping. Anything we can do to help? --=20 Kind regards, Luca Boccassi --=-7cNmpc9y6m8yH9KN906l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEErCSqx93EIPGOymuRKGv37813JB4FAmCjyjYACgkQKGv37813 JB7efQ/8CBJtMkvtRVeeP9x8bxeNZAsvczKnDaFTcMZ1sEvFj/WmDN+rYVRDeLSF 5kDFHIF9gMcU/FzsdFaM8cW5cjJaRHspJM1gLPMPfKa+amR/xHgzXjBX/Lc1CAln wn2dYstVVMHrM9vi5OAQ5PUQlm3bqQ51FtFP6WEkr+RL43muy8kg+ZY3PVUFVZmB ogAzqLxmDvmL5PEwddQNv/uZuCN/IdVa1u9w7qXQuO0BIT7lJMuupEBlGBNcxJbJ H/GGqf7wIDandzb7QVdl21dNnlCkkhFqftHlK8RCaBt7CzZ6OaJ6F7OH1+8HCQj4 iIg4gEeyMz5B/umn6+BDu49ffKY3qq1kqMQZoQB3zAGLcGLqS6XGo7SBGW57zlA6 408s626jiRp4SnLznWHcGcThiYvuTirUcKz5iJgq41V86z+OW6tks/DHbg7+4znc BkC4O14PYwlsODSBK+2bwUyfetIQONENNMx2+fDb/nE45spiKdL1HBcqOLes3tuO 2Ib3KO94SumnUmfYOzrZ3YDU+KM/esQUOypeXO+jwZIflM7qsUYjhjXr7K9foqx6 8JC2fqg9hUDWI/2cF9DYoyCByF+ol3yiZyRKawXU4VrMNLmw8VzV4gcgnN4Hw8mU 2+vIZUjyrN63rUgLZEiYXxOButdID06WkcmGlunK9TR9RRY1ukA= =JF4k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-7cNmpc9y6m8yH9KN906l--