From: Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@codeaurora.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>,
hemantk@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mhi: pci_generic: Remove WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag from state workqueue
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:46:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6a1b0b928dbd2b9addd617e9c72e80f@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210224102516.GW27945@work>
On 2021-02-24 02:25 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 11:18:50AM +0100, Loic Poulain wrote:
>> A recent change created a dedicated workqueue for the state-change
>> work
>> with WQ_HIGHPRI (no strong reason for that) and WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flags,
>> but the state-change work (mhi_pm_st_worker) does not guarantee
>> forward
>> progress under memory pressure, and will even wait on various memory
>> allocations when e.g. creating devices, loading firmware, etc... The
>> work is then not part of a memory reclaim path...
>>
>> Moreover, this causes a warning in check_flush_dependency() since we
>> end
>> up in code that flushes a non-reclaim workqueue:
>>
>> [ 40.969601] workqueue: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM
>> mhi_hiprio_wq:mhi_pm_st_worker [mhi] is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM
>> events_highpri:flush_backlog
>> [ 40.969612] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 158 at kernel/workqueue.c:2607
>> check_flush_dependency+0x11c/0x140
>> [ 40.969733] Call Trace:
>> [ 40.969740] __flush_work+0x97/0x1d0
>> [ 40.969745] ? wake_up_process+0x15/0x20
>> [ 40.969749] ? insert_work+0x70/0x80
>> [ 40.969750] ? __queue_work+0x14a/0x3e0
>> [ 40.969753] flush_work+0x10/0x20
>> [ 40.969756] rollback_registered_many+0x1c9/0x510
>> [ 40.969759] unregister_netdevice_queue+0x94/0x120
>> [ 40.969761] unregister_netdev+0x1d/0x30
>> [ 40.969765] mhi_net_remove+0x1a/0x40 [mhi_net]
>> [ 40.969770] mhi_driver_remove+0x124/0x250 [mhi]
>> [ 40.969776] device_release_driver_internal+0xf0/0x1d0
>> [ 40.969778] device_release_driver+0x12/0x20
>> [ 40.969782] bus_remove_device+0xe1/0x150
>> [ 40.969786] device_del+0x17b/0x3e0
>> [ 40.969791] mhi_destroy_device+0x9a/0x100 [mhi]
>> [ 40.969796] ? mhi_unmap_single_use_bb+0x50/0x50 [mhi]
>> [ 40.969799] device_for_each_child+0x5e/0xa0
>> [ 40.969804] mhi_pm_st_worker+0x921/0xf50 [mhi]
>>
>> Fixes: 8f7039787687 ("bus: mhi: core: Move to using high priority
>> workqueue")
>> Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@codeaurora.org>
>
> Fix looks good to me but I want Bhaumik to share his review since he
> authored the offending patch.
>
We have seen this internally as well. I agree this patch needs to go in.
We had previously seen issues using global workqueue hence decided to
move to a
dedicated one with WQ_HIGHPRI in order to speed up execution of the
worker when
a certain task is queued. For example, handling SBL or power down needs
to be
done promptly.
> Thanks,
> Mani
>
>> ---
>> drivers/bus/mhi/core/init.c | 3 +--
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/init.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/init.c
>> index 32eb90f..03ddd6e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/init.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/init.c
>> @@ -890,8 +890,7 @@ int mhi_register_controller(struct mhi_controller
>> *mhi_cntrl,
>> INIT_WORK(&mhi_cntrl->st_worker, mhi_pm_st_worker);
>> init_waitqueue_head(&mhi_cntrl->state_event);
>>
>> - mhi_cntrl->hiprio_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue
>> - ("mhi_hiprio_wq", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_HIGHPRI);
>> + mhi_cntrl->hiprio_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("mhi_hiprio_wq",
>> WQ_HIGHPRI);
>> if (!mhi_cntrl->hiprio_wq) {
>> dev_err(mhi_cntrl->cntrl_dev, "Failed to allocate workqueue\n");
>> ret = -ENOMEM;
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
Thanks,
Bhaumik
---
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-24 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-24 10:18 [PATCH] mhi: pci_generic: Remove WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag from state workqueue Loic Poulain
2021-02-24 10:25 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-02-24 17:46 ` Bhaumik Bhatt [this message]
2021-03-10 13:41 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-03-10 13:43 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-05-26 19:03 ` patchwork-bot+linux-arm-msm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e6a1b0b928dbd2b9addd617e9c72e80f@codeaurora.org \
--to=bbhatt@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hemantk@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loic.poulain@linaro.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.