All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
To: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, dsterba@suse.com
Cc: hare@suse.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 09/40] btrfs: implement zoned chunk allocator
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:24:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e85bee22-a100-f9b3-8c03-ac216ad97a85@toxicpanda.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6c977b7099812637cff36d09ac1a8e6ea2e00519.1608608848.git.naohiro.aota@wdc.com>

On 12/21/20 10:49 PM, Naohiro Aota wrote:
> This commit implements a zoned chunk/dev_extent allocator. The zoned
> allocator aligns the device extents to zone boundaries, so that a zone
> reset affects only the device extent and does not change the state of
> blocks in the neighbor device extents.
> 
> Also, it checks that a region allocation is not overlapping any of the
> super block zones, and ensures the region is empty.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
> ---
>   fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 169 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   fs/btrfs/volumes.h |   1 +
>   fs/btrfs/zoned.c   | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   fs/btrfs/zoned.h   |  25 +++++++
>   4 files changed, 323 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 2cdb5fe3e423..19c76cf9d2d2 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -1424,11 +1424,62 @@ static u64 dev_extent_search_start(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 start)
>   		 * make sure to start at an offset of at least 1MB.
>   		 */
>   		return max_t(u64, start, SZ_1M);
> +	case BTRFS_CHUNK_ALLOC_ZONED:
> +		/*
> +		 * We don't care about the starting region like regular
> +		 * allocator, because we anyway use/reserve the first two
> +		 * zones for superblock logging.
> +		 */
> +		return ALIGN(start, device->zone_info->zone_size);
>   	default:
>   		BUG();
>   	}
>   }
>   
> +static bool dev_extent_hole_check_zoned(struct btrfs_device *device,
> +					u64 *hole_start, u64 *hole_size,
> +					u64 num_bytes)
> +{
> +	u64 zone_size = device->zone_info->zone_size;
> +	u64 pos;
> +	int ret;
> +	int changed = 0;
> +
> +	ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(*hole_start, zone_size));
> +
> +	while (*hole_size > 0) {
> +		pos = btrfs_find_allocatable_zones(device, *hole_start,
> +						   *hole_start + *hole_size,
> +						   num_bytes);
> +		if (pos != *hole_start) {
> +			*hole_size = *hole_start + *hole_size - pos;
> +			*hole_start = pos;
> +			changed = 1;
> +			if (*hole_size < num_bytes)
> +				break;
> +		}
> +
> +		ret = btrfs_ensure_empty_zones(device, pos, num_bytes);
> +
> +		/* Range is ensured to be empty */
> +		if (!ret)
> +			return changed;
> +
> +		/* Given hole range was invalid (outside of device) */
> +		if (ret == -ERANGE) {
> +			*hole_start += *hole_size;
> +			*hole_size = 0;
> +			return 1;
> +		}
> +
> +		*hole_start += zone_size;
> +		*hole_size -= zone_size;
> +		changed = 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	return changed;
> +}
> +
>   /**
>    * dev_extent_hole_check - check if specified hole is suitable for allocation
>    * @device:	the device which we have the hole
> @@ -1445,24 +1496,39 @@ static bool dev_extent_hole_check(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 *hole_start,
>   	bool changed = false;
>   	u64 hole_end = *hole_start + *hole_size;
>   
> -	/*
> -	 * Check before we set max_hole_start, otherwise we could end up
> -	 * sending back this offset anyway.
> -	 */
> -	if (contains_pending_extent(device, hole_start, *hole_size)) {
> -		if (hole_end >= *hole_start)
> -			*hole_size = hole_end - *hole_start;
> -		else
> -			*hole_size = 0;
> -		changed = true;
> -	}
> +	for (;;) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Check before we set max_hole_start, otherwise we could end up
> +		 * sending back this offset anyway.
> +		 */
> +		if (contains_pending_extent(device, hole_start, *hole_size)) {
> +			if (hole_end >= *hole_start)
> +				*hole_size = hole_end - *hole_start;
> +			else
> +				*hole_size = 0;
> +			changed = true;
> +		}
> +
> +		switch (device->fs_devices->chunk_alloc_policy) {
> +		case BTRFS_CHUNK_ALLOC_REGULAR:
> +			/* No extra check */
> +			break;
> +		case BTRFS_CHUNK_ALLOC_ZONED:
> +			if (dev_extent_hole_check_zoned(device, hole_start,
> +							hole_size, num_bytes)) {
> +				changed = true;
> +				/*
> +				 * The changed hole can contain pending
> +				 * extent. Loop again to check that.
> +				 */
> +				continue;
> +			}
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			BUG();
> +		}
>   
> -	switch (device->fs_devices->chunk_alloc_policy) {
> -	case BTRFS_CHUNK_ALLOC_REGULAR:
> -		/* No extra check */
>   		break;
> -	default:
> -		BUG();
>   	}
>   
>   	return changed;
> @@ -1515,6 +1581,9 @@ static int find_free_dev_extent_start(struct btrfs_device *device,
>   
>   	search_start = dev_extent_search_start(device, search_start);
>   
> +	WARN_ON(device->zone_info &&
> +		!IS_ALIGNED(num_bytes, device->zone_info->zone_size));
> +
>   	path = btrfs_alloc_path();
>   	if (!path)
>   		return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -4913,6 +4982,37 @@ static void init_alloc_chunk_ctl_policy_regular(
>   	ctl->dev_extent_min = BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN * ctl->dev_stripes;
>   }
>   
> +static void init_alloc_chunk_ctl_policy_zoned(
> +				      struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices,
> +				      struct alloc_chunk_ctl *ctl)
> +{
> +	u64 zone_size = fs_devices->fs_info->zone_size;
> +	u64 limit;
> +	int min_num_stripes = ctl->devs_min * ctl->dev_stripes;
> +	int min_data_stripes = (min_num_stripes - ctl->nparity) / ctl->ncopies;
> +	u64 min_chunk_size = min_data_stripes * zone_size;
> +	u64 type = ctl->type;
> +
> +	ctl->max_stripe_size = zone_size;
> +	if (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA) {
> +		ctl->max_chunk_size = round_down(BTRFS_MAX_DATA_CHUNK_SIZE,
> +						 zone_size);
> +	} else if (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA) {
> +		ctl->max_chunk_size = ctl->max_stripe_size;
> +	} else if (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM) {
> +		ctl->max_chunk_size = 2 * ctl->max_stripe_size;
> +		ctl->devs_max = min_t(int, ctl->devs_max,
> +				      BTRFS_MAX_DEVS_SYS_CHUNK);
> +	}
> +
> +	/* We don't want a chunk larger than 10% of writable space */
> +	limit = max(round_down(div_factor(fs_devices->total_rw_bytes, 1),
> +			       zone_size),
> +		    min_chunk_size);
> +	ctl->max_chunk_size = min(limit, ctl->max_chunk_size);
> +	ctl->dev_extent_min = zone_size * ctl->dev_stripes;
> +}
> +
>   static void init_alloc_chunk_ctl(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices,
>   				 struct alloc_chunk_ctl *ctl)
>   {
> @@ -4933,6 +5033,9 @@ static void init_alloc_chunk_ctl(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices,
>   	case BTRFS_CHUNK_ALLOC_REGULAR:
>   		init_alloc_chunk_ctl_policy_regular(fs_devices, ctl);
>   		break;
> +	case BTRFS_CHUNK_ALLOC_ZONED:
> +		init_alloc_chunk_ctl_policy_zoned(fs_devices, ctl);
> +		break;
>   	default:
>   		BUG();
>   	}
> @@ -5059,6 +5162,38 @@ static int decide_stripe_size_regular(struct alloc_chunk_ctl *ctl,
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static int decide_stripe_size_zoned(struct alloc_chunk_ctl *ctl,
> +				    struct btrfs_device_info *devices_info)
> +{
> +	u64 zone_size = devices_info[0].dev->zone_info->zone_size;
> +	/* Number of stripes that count for block group size */
> +	int data_stripes;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * It should hold because:
> +	 *    dev_extent_min == dev_extent_want == zone_size * dev_stripes
> +	 */
> +	ASSERT(devices_info[ctl->ndevs - 1].max_avail == ctl->dev_extent_min);
> +
> +	ctl->stripe_size = zone_size;
> +	ctl->num_stripes = ctl->ndevs * ctl->dev_stripes;
> +	data_stripes = (ctl->num_stripes - ctl->nparity) / ctl->ncopies;
> +
> +	/* stripe_size is fixed in ZONED. Reduce ndevs instead. */
> +	if (ctl->stripe_size * data_stripes > ctl->max_chunk_size) {
> +		ctl->ndevs = div_u64(div_u64(ctl->max_chunk_size * ctl->ncopies,
> +					     ctl->stripe_size) + ctl->nparity,
> +				     ctl->dev_stripes);
> +		ctl->num_stripes = ctl->ndevs * ctl->dev_stripes;
> +		data_stripes = (ctl->num_stripes - ctl->nparity) / ctl->ncopies;
> +		ASSERT(ctl->stripe_size * data_stripes <= ctl->max_chunk_size);
> +	}
> +
> +	ctl->chunk_size = ctl->stripe_size * data_stripes;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   static int decide_stripe_size(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices,
>   			      struct alloc_chunk_ctl *ctl,
>   			      struct btrfs_device_info *devices_info)
> @@ -5086,6 +5221,8 @@ static int decide_stripe_size(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices,
>   	switch (fs_devices->chunk_alloc_policy) {
>   	case BTRFS_CHUNK_ALLOC_REGULAR:
>   		return decide_stripe_size_regular(ctl, devices_info);
> +	case BTRFS_CHUNK_ALLOC_ZONED:
> +		return decide_stripe_size_zoned(ctl, devices_info);
>   	default:
>   		BUG();
>   	}
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> index 59d9d47f173d..c8841b714f2e 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> @@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ BTRFS_DEVICE_GETSET_FUNCS(bytes_used);
>   
>   enum btrfs_chunk_allocation_policy {
>   	BTRFS_CHUNK_ALLOC_REGULAR,
> +	BTRFS_CHUNK_ALLOC_ZONED,
>   };
>   
>   /*
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
> index fc43a650cd79..b1ece6b978dd 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
> @@ -1,11 +1,13 @@
>   // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>   
> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
>   #include <linux/slab.h>
>   #include <linux/blkdev.h>
>   #include "ctree.h"
>   #include "volumes.h"
>   #include "zoned.h"
>   #include "rcu-string.h"
> +#include "disk-io.h"
>   
>   /* Maximum number of zones to report per blkdev_report_zones() call */
>   #define BTRFS_REPORT_NR_ZONES   4096
> @@ -529,6 +531,7 @@ int btrfs_check_zoned_mode(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
>   
>   	fs_info->zone_size = zone_size;
>   	fs_info->max_zone_append_size = max_zone_append_size;
> +	fs_info->fs_devices->chunk_alloc_policy = BTRFS_CHUNK_ALLOC_ZONED;
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Check mount options here, because we might change fs_info->zoned
> @@ -746,3 +749,144 @@ int btrfs_reset_sb_log_zones(struct block_device *bdev, int mirror)
>   				sb_zone << zone_sectors_shift,
>   				zone_sectors * BTRFS_NR_SB_LOG_ZONES, GFP_NOFS);
>   }
> +
> +/*
> + * btrfs_check_allocatable_zones - find allocatable zones within give region
> + * @device:	the device to allocate a region
> + * @hole_start: the position of the hole to allocate the region
> + * @num_bytes:	the size of wanted region
> + * @hole_size:	the size of hole
> + *
> + * Allocatable region should not contain any superblock locations.
> + */
> +u64 btrfs_find_allocatable_zones(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 hole_start,
> +				 u64 hole_end, u64 num_bytes)
> +{
> +	struct btrfs_zoned_device_info *zinfo = device->zone_info;
> +	u8 shift = zinfo->zone_size_shift;
> +	u64 nzones = num_bytes >> shift;
> +	u64 pos = hole_start;
> +	u64 begin, end;
> +	bool have_sb;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(hole_start, zinfo->zone_size));
> +	ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(num_bytes, zinfo->zone_size));
> +
> +	while (pos < hole_end) {
> +		begin = pos >> shift;
> +		end = begin + nzones;
> +
> +		if (end > zinfo->nr_zones)
> +			return hole_end;
> +
> +		/* Check if zones in the region are all empty */
> +		if (btrfs_dev_is_sequential(device, pos) &&
> +		    find_next_zero_bit(zinfo->empty_zones, end, begin) != end) {
> +			pos += zinfo->zone_size;
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +
> +		have_sb = false;
> +		for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_SUPER_MIRROR_MAX; i++) {
> +			u32 sb_zone;
> +			u64 sb_pos;
> +
> +			sb_zone = sb_zone_number(shift, i);
> +			if (!(end <= sb_zone ||
> +			      sb_zone + BTRFS_NR_SB_LOG_ZONES <= begin)) {
> +				have_sb = true;
> +				pos = ((u64)sb_zone + BTRFS_NR_SB_LOG_ZONES) << shift;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * We also need to exclude regular superblock
> +			 * positions
> +			 */
> +			sb_pos = btrfs_sb_offset(i);
> +			if (!(pos + num_bytes <= sb_pos ||
> +			      sb_pos + BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE <= pos)) {
> +				have_sb = true;
> +				pos = ALIGN(sb_pos + BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE,
> +					    zinfo->zone_size);
> +				break;
> +			}
> +		}
> +		if (!have_sb)
> +			break;
> +

Extra newline here, other than that you can add

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>

Thanks,

Josef

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-11 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-22  3:48 [PATCH v11 00/40] btrfs: zoned block device support Naohiro Aota
2020-12-22  3:48 ` [PATCH v11 01/40] block: add bio_add_zone_append_page Naohiro Aota
2020-12-22  3:48   ` [PATCH v11 02/40] iomap: support REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND Naohiro Aota
2021-01-04 22:30     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-13  9:34       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-12-22  3:48   ` [PATCH v11 03/40] btrfs: defer loading zone info after opening trees Naohiro Aota
2021-01-11 19:16     ` Josef Bacik
2020-12-22  3:48   ` [PATCH v11 04/40] btrfs: change superblock location on conventional zone Naohiro Aota
2021-01-11 19:47     ` Josef Bacik
2021-01-14 15:10       ` Naohiro Aota
2020-12-22  3:48   ` [PATCH v11 05/40] btrfs: release path before calling into btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info Naohiro Aota
2021-01-11 20:01     ` Josef Bacik
2021-01-12  8:05       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-12-22  3:48   ` [PATCH v11 06/40] btrfs: do not load fs_info->zoned from incompat flag Naohiro Aota
2021-01-11 20:08     ` Josef Bacik
2021-01-12  8:00       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 07/40] btrfs: disallow fitrim in ZONED mode Naohiro Aota
2021-01-11 20:12     ` Josef Bacik
2021-01-12 10:19       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 08/40] btrfs: emulated zoned mode on non-zoned devices Naohiro Aota
2021-01-11 20:54     ` Josef Bacik
2021-01-13 17:58     ` David Sterba
2021-01-13 18:23       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 09/40] btrfs: implement zoned chunk allocator Naohiro Aota
2021-01-11 21:24     ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 10/40] btrfs: verify device extent is aligned to zone Naohiro Aota
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 11/40] btrfs: load zone's allocation offset Naohiro Aota
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 12/40] btrfs: calculate allocation offset for conventional zones Naohiro Aota
2021-01-12 15:12     ` Josef Bacik
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 13/40] btrfs: track unusable bytes for zones Naohiro Aota
2021-01-12 15:45     ` Josef Bacik
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 14/40] btrfs: do sequential extent allocation in ZONED mode Naohiro Aota
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 15/40] btrfs: redirty released extent buffers " Naohiro Aota
2021-01-12 15:51     ` Josef Bacik
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 16/40] btrfs: advance allocation pointer after tree log node Naohiro Aota
2021-01-12 15:52     ` Josef Bacik
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 17/40] btrfs: enable to mount ZONED incompat flag Naohiro Aota
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 18/40] btrfs: reset zones of unused block groups Naohiro Aota
2021-01-12 15:54     ` Josef Bacik
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 19/40] btrfs: extract page adding function Naohiro Aota
2021-01-11 16:22     ` Josef Bacik
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 20/40] btrfs: use bio_add_zone_append_page for zoned btrfs Naohiro Aota
2021-01-12 15:55     ` Josef Bacik
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 21/40] btrfs: handle REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND as writing Naohiro Aota
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 22/40] btrfs: split ordered extent when bio is sent Naohiro Aota
2021-01-12 15:59     ` Josef Bacik
2021-01-13 10:05       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-01-15  7:08     ` Su Yue
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 23/40] btrfs: extend btrfs_rmap_block for specifying a device Naohiro Aota
2021-01-12 16:00     ` Josef Bacik
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 24/40] btrfs: cache if block-group is on a sequential zone Naohiro Aota
2021-01-12 16:01     ` Josef Bacik
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 25/40] btrfs: use ZONE_APPEND write for ZONED btrfs Naohiro Aota
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 26/40] btrfs: enable zone append writing for direct IO Naohiro Aota
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 27/40] btrfs: introduce dedicated data write path for ZONED mode Naohiro Aota
2021-01-12 19:24     ` Josef Bacik
2021-01-13 10:41       ` Naohiro Aota
2021-01-12 19:28     ` Josef Bacik
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 28/40] btrfs: serialize meta IOs on " Naohiro Aota
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 29/40] btrfs: wait existing extents before truncating Naohiro Aota
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 30/40] btrfs: avoid async metadata checksum on ZONED mode Naohiro Aota
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 31/40] btrfs: mark block groups to copy for device-replace Naohiro Aota
2021-01-12 19:30     ` Josef Bacik
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 32/40] btrfs: implement cloning for ZONED device-replace Naohiro Aota
2021-01-12 19:36     ` Josef Bacik
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 33/40] btrfs: implement copying " Naohiro Aota
2021-01-12 19:37     ` Josef Bacik
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 34/40] btrfs: support dev-replace in ZONED mode Naohiro Aota
2021-01-12 19:37     ` Josef Bacik
2021-01-12 19:40     ` Josef Bacik
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 35/40] btrfs: enable relocation " Naohiro Aota
2021-01-12 19:43     ` Josef Bacik
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 36/40] btrfs: relocate block group to repair IO failure in ZONED Naohiro Aota
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 37/40] btrfs: split alloc_log_tree() Naohiro Aota
2021-01-12 19:44     ` Josef Bacik
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 38/40] btrfs: extend zoned allocator to use dedicated tree-log block group Naohiro Aota
2021-01-12 19:48     ` Josef Bacik
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 39/40] btrfs: serialize log transaction on ZONED mode Naohiro Aota
2021-01-12 19:50     ` Josef Bacik
2020-12-22  3:49   ` [PATCH v11 40/40] btrfs: reorder log node allocation Naohiro Aota
2020-12-22 13:35   ` [PATCH v11 01/40] block: add bio_add_zone_append_page Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-12 13:48     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-12-22 13:38 ` [PATCH v11 00/40] btrfs: zoned block device support Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-11 10:17   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-01-12 10:23     ` hch
2021-01-12 10:26       ` Johannes Thumshirn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e85bee22-a100-f9b3-8c03-ac216ad97a85@toxicpanda.com \
    --to=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=naohiro.aota@wdc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.