All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 08/20] s390x/tcg: Implement 32/128 bit for VECTOR FP COMPARE (AND SIGNAL) SCALAR
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 10:52:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e87d0716-2e62-33dc-a5b6-6e29d19d225b@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200930145523.71087-9-david@redhat.com>

On 9/30/20 9:55 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> @@ -2601,19 +2601,41 @@ static DisasJumpType op_wfc(DisasContext *s, DisasOps *o)
>  {
>      const uint8_t fpf = get_field(s, m3);
>      const uint8_t m4 = get_field(s, m4);
> +    gen_helper_gvec_2_ptr *fn = NULL;
>  
> -    if (fpf != FPF_LONG || m4) {
> +    switch (fpf) {
> +    case FPF_SHORT:
> +        if (s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_VECTOR_ENH)) {
> +            fn = gen_helper_gvec_wfk32;
> +            if (s->fields.op2 == 0xcb) {

Hoist and name this comparision (e.g. bool signal = ...).

> -static int wfc64(const S390Vector *v1, const S390Vector *v2,
> -                 CPUS390XState *env, bool signal, uintptr_t retaddr)
> -{
> -    /* only the zero-indexed elements are compared */
> -    const float64 a = s390_vec_read_element64(v1, 0);
> -    const float64 b = s390_vec_read_element64(v2, 0);
> -    uint8_t vxc, vec_exc = 0;
> -    int cmp;
> -
> -    if (signal) {
> -        cmp = float64_compare(a, b, &env->fpu_status);
> -    } else {
> -        cmp = float64_compare_quiet(a, b, &env->fpu_status);
> -    }
> -    vxc = check_ieee_exc(env, 0, false, &vec_exc);
> -    handle_ieee_exc(env, vxc, vec_exc, retaddr);
> -
> -    return float_comp_to_cc(env, cmp);
> +#define DEF_WFC(BITS)                                                          \
> +static int wfc##BITS(const S390Vector *v1, const S390Vector *v2,               \
> +                     CPUS390XState *env, bool signal, uintptr_t retaddr)       \
> +{                                                                              \
> +    /* only the zero-indexed elements are compared */                          \
> +    const float##BITS a = s390_vec_read_float##BITS(v1, 0);                    \
> +    const float##BITS b = s390_vec_read_float##BITS(v2, 0);                    \
> +    uint8_t vxc, vec_exc = 0;                                                  \
> +    int cmp;                                                                   \
> +                                                                               \
> +    if (signal) {                                                              \
> +        cmp = float##BITS##_compare(a, b, &env->fpu_status);                   \
> +    } else {                                                                   \
> +        cmp = float##BITS##_compare_quiet(a, b, &env->fpu_status);             \
> +    }                                                                          \
> +    vxc = check_ieee_exc(env, 0, false, &vec_exc);                             \
> +    handle_ieee_exc(env, vxc, vec_exc, retaddr);                               \
> +                                                                               \
> +    return float_comp_to_cc(env, cmp);                                         \
>  }
> +DEF_WFC(32)
> +DEF_WFC(64)
> +DEF_WFC(128)

So, same issue here vs debugging.

If you keep this macroized, I don't see the value in two levels of macros...

> +#define DEF_GVEC_WFC(BITS)                                                     \
> +void HELPER(gvec_wfc##BITS)(const void *v1, const void *v2, CPUS390XState *env,\
> +                            uint32_t desc)                                     \
> +{                                                                              \
> +    env->cc_op = wfc##BITS(v1, v2, env, false, GETPC());                       \
>  }
> +DEF_GVEC_WFC(32)
> +DEF_GVEC_WFC(64)
> +DEF_GVEC_WFC(128)
>  
> +#define DEF_GVEC_WFK(BITS)                                                     \
> +void HELPER(gvec_wfk##BITS)(const void *v1, const void *v2, CPUS390XState *env,\
> +                            uint32_t desc)                                     \
> +{                                                                              \
> +    env->cc_op = wfc##BITS(v1, v2, env, true, GETPC());                        \
>  }
> +DEF_GVEC_WFK(32)
> +DEF_GVEC_WFK(64)
> +DEF_GVEC_WFK(128)

These could be folded in to the first macro via parameters.


r~



  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-01 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-30 14:55 [PATCH v1 00/20] s390x/tcg: Implement Vector enhancements facility and switch to z14 David Hildenbrand
2020-09-30 14:55 ` [PATCH v1 01/20] softfloat: Implement float128_(min|minnum|minnummag|max|maxnum|maxnummag) David Hildenbrand
2020-09-30 16:10   ` Alex Bennée
2020-10-01 12:40     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-10-01 13:15       ` Alex Bennée
2021-05-05 14:54         ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-10  9:57           ` Alex Bennée
2021-05-10 10:00             ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-30 14:55 ` [PATCH v1 02/20] s390x/tcg: Implement VECTOR BIT PERMUTE David Hildenbrand
2020-10-01 15:17   ` Richard Henderson
2020-10-01 17:28     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-30 14:55 ` [PATCH v1 03/20] s390x/tcg: Implement VECTOR MULTIPLY SUM LOGICAL David Hildenbrand
2020-10-01 15:26   ` Richard Henderson
2020-10-01 17:30     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-30 14:55 ` [PATCH v1 04/20] s390x/tcg: Implement 32/128 bit for VECTOR FP ADD David Hildenbrand
2020-10-01 15:45   ` Richard Henderson
2020-10-01 16:08   ` Richard Henderson
2020-10-01 17:08     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-30 14:55 ` [PATCH v1 05/20] s390x/tcg: Implement 32/128 bit for VECTOR FP DIVIDE David Hildenbrand
2020-09-30 14:55 ` [PATCH v1 06/20] s390x/tcg: Implement 32/128 bit for VECTOR FP MULTIPLY David Hildenbrand
2020-09-30 14:55 ` [PATCH v1 07/20] s390x/tcg: Implement 32/128 bit for VECTOR FP SUBTRACT David Hildenbrand
2020-09-30 14:55 ` [PATCH v1 08/20] s390x/tcg: Implement 32/128 bit for VECTOR FP COMPARE (AND SIGNAL) SCALAR David Hildenbrand
2020-10-01 15:52   ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2020-09-30 14:55 ` [PATCH v1 09/20] s390x/tcg: Implement 32/128 bit for VECTOR FP COMPARE * David Hildenbrand
2020-10-01 16:12   ` Richard Henderson
2020-09-30 14:55 ` [PATCH v1 10/20] s390x/tcg: Implement 32/128 bit for VECTOR LOAD FP INTEGER David Hildenbrand
2020-09-30 14:55 ` [PATCH v1 11/20] s390x/tcg: Implement 64 bit for VECTOR FP LOAD LENGTHENED David Hildenbrand
2020-10-01 16:19   ` Richard Henderson
2020-09-30 14:55 ` [PATCH v1 12/20] s390x/tcg: Implement 128 bit for VECTOR FP LOAD ROUNDED David Hildenbrand
2020-10-01 16:21   ` Richard Henderson
2020-09-30 14:55 ` [PATCH v1 13/20] s390x/tcg: Implement 32/128 bit for VECTOR FP PERFORM SIGN OPERATION David Hildenbrand
2020-10-01 16:24   ` Richard Henderson
2020-09-30 14:55 ` [PATCH v1 14/20] s390x/tcg: Implement 32/128 bit for VECTOR FP SQUARE ROOT David Hildenbrand
2020-09-30 14:55 ` [PATCH v1 15/20] s390x/tcg: Implement 32/128 bit for VECTOR FP TEST DATA CLASS IMMEDIATE David Hildenbrand
2020-10-01 16:30   ` Richard Henderson
2020-09-30 14:55 ` [PATCH v1 16/20] s390x/tcg: Implement 32/128bit for VECTOR FP MULTIPLY AND (ADD|SUBTRACT) David Hildenbrand
2020-09-30 14:55 ` [PATCH v1 17/20] s390x/tcg: Implement VECTOR FP NEGATIVE " David Hildenbrand
2020-09-30 14:55 ` [PATCH v1 18/20] s390x/tcg: Implement VECTOR FP (MAXIMUM|MINIMUM) David Hildenbrand
2020-10-01 16:49   ` Richard Henderson
2020-09-30 14:55 ` [PATCH v1 19/20] s390x/tcg: We support Vector enhancements facility David Hildenbrand
2020-10-01 16:50   ` Richard Henderson
2020-09-30 14:55 ` [PATCH v1 20/20] s390x/cpumodel: Bump up QEMU model to a stripped-down IBM z14 GA2 David Hildenbrand
2020-10-01 16:52   ` Richard Henderson
2020-09-30 15:35 ` [PATCH v1 00/20] s390x/tcg: Implement Vector enhancements facility and switch to z14 no-reply
2020-10-01 15:07 ` Richard Henderson
2020-10-07 13:09   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-05 10:55 ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e87d0716-2e62-33dc-a5b6-6e29d19d225b@linaro.org \
    --to=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.