From: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: keescook@chromium.org, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
paul@paul-moore.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: [PATCH v3 15/24] LSM: Specify which LSM to display
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 11:48:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eb2c3cd3-0de4-807a-ec67-3f11a83cb100@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190621185233.6766-16-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
On 6/21/19 11:52 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> Create a new entry "display" in /proc/.../attr for controlling
> which LSM security information is displayed for a process.
> The name of an active LSM that supplies hooks for human readable
> data may be written to "display" to set the value. The name of
> the LSM currently in use can be read from "display".
> At this point there can only be one LSM capable of display
> active.
>
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
there is small issue, see below
Also I want to get rid of the list search for the display lsm
but that can come as a separate patch later
> ---
> fs/proc/base.c | 1 +
> security/security.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> index ddef482f1334..7bf70e041315 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -2618,6 +2618,7 @@ static const struct pid_entry attr_dir_stuff[] = {
> ATTR(NULL, "fscreate", 0666),
> ATTR(NULL, "keycreate", 0666),
> ATTR(NULL, "sockcreate", 0666),
> + ATTR(NULL, "display", 0666),
> #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK
> DIR("smack", 0555,
> proc_smack_attr_dir_inode_ops, proc_smack_attr_dir_ops),
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index aa8e1c73a062..92c5aa427b53 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -46,7 +46,9 @@ static struct kmem_cache *lsm_file_cache;
> static struct kmem_cache *lsm_inode_cache;
>
> char *lsm_names;
> -static struct lsm_blob_sizes blob_sizes __lsm_ro_after_init;
> +static struct lsm_blob_sizes blob_sizes __lsm_ro_after_init = {
> + .lbs_task = sizeof(int), /* slot number for the "display" LSM */
> +};
>
> /* Boot-time LSM user choice */
> static __initdata const char *chosen_lsm_order;
> @@ -583,6 +585,8 @@ int lsm_inode_alloc(struct inode *inode)
> */
> static int lsm_task_alloc(struct task_struct *task)
> {
> + int *display;
> +
> if (blob_sizes.lbs_task == 0) {
> task->security = NULL;
> return 0;
> @@ -591,6 +595,15 @@ static int lsm_task_alloc(struct task_struct *task)
> task->security = kzalloc(blob_sizes.lbs_task, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (task->security == NULL)
> return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + /*
> + * The start of the task blob contains the "display" LSM slot number.
> + * Start with it set to the invalid slot number, indicating that the
> + * default first registered LSM be displayed.
> + */
> + display = task->security;
> + *display = LSMBLOB_INVALID;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1579,14 +1592,24 @@ int security_file_open(struct file *file)
>
> int security_task_alloc(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long clone_flags)
> {
> + int *odisplay = current->security;
> + int *ndisplay;
> int rc = lsm_task_alloc(task);
>
> - if (rc)
> + if (unlikely(rc))
> return rc;
> +
> rc = call_int_hook(task_alloc, 0, task, clone_flags);
> - if (unlikely(rc))
> + if (unlikely(rc)) {
> security_task_free(task);
> - return rc;
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> + ndisplay = task->security;
> + if (ndisplay && odisplay)
> + *ndisplay = *odisplay;
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> void security_task_free(struct task_struct *task)
> @@ -1972,10 +1995,28 @@ int security_getprocattr(struct task_struct *p, const char *lsm, char *name,
> char **value)
> {
> struct security_hook_list *hp;
> + int *display = current->security;
> +
> + if (!strcmp(name, "display")) {
> + hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.secid_to_secctx,
> + list) {
> + if (*display == LSMBLOB_INVALID ||
> + hp->slot == *display) {
> + *value = kstrdup(hp->lsm, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (*value)
> + return strlen(hp->lsm);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + }
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.getprocattr, list) {
> if (lsm != NULL && strcmp(lsm, hp->lsm))
> continue;
> + if (lsm == NULL && *display != LSMBLOB_INVALID &&
> + *display != hp->slot)
> + continue;
> return hp->hook.getprocattr(p, name, value);
> }
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -1985,10 +2026,27 @@ int security_setprocattr(const char *lsm, const char *name, void *value,
> size_t size)
> {
> struct security_hook_list *hp;
> + int *display = current->security;
> + int len;
> +
> + if (!strcmp(name, "display")) {
> + hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.secid_to_secctx,
> + list) {
> + len = strlen(hp->lsm);
> + if (size >= len && !strncmp(value, hp->lsm, len)) {
This isn't quite right. It allows a value that contains a prefix of an lsm to match. That
is
selinux2
etc would match to selinux. While it isn't a real problem atm. Its not something I
want as part of the user space API which would make it so we can't fix it.
> + *display = hp->slot;
> + return size;
> + }
> + }
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.setprocattr, list) {
> if (lsm != NULL && strcmp(lsm, hp->lsm))
> continue;
> + if (lsm == NULL && *display != LSMBLOB_INVALID &&
> + *display != hp->slot)
> + continue;
> return hp->hook.setprocattr(name, value, size);
> }
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -2008,14 +2066,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_ismaclabel);
> int security_secid_to_secctx(struct lsmblob *blob, char **secdata, u32 *seclen)
> {
> struct security_hook_list *hp;
> - int rc;
> + int *display = current->security;
>
> - hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.secid_to_secctx, list) {
> - rc = hp->hook.secid_to_secctx(blob->secid[hp->slot],
> - secdata, seclen);
> - if (rc != 0)
> - return rc;
> - }
> + hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.secid_to_secctx, list)
> + if (*display == LSMBLOB_INVALID || *display == hp->slot)
> + return hp->hook.secid_to_secctx(blob->secid[hp->slot],
> + secdata, seclen);
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_secid_to_secctx);
> @@ -2024,22 +2080,27 @@ int security_secctx_to_secid(const char *secdata, u32 seclen,
> struct lsmblob *blob)
> {
> struct security_hook_list *hp;
> - int rc;
> + int *display = current->security;
>
> lsmblob_init(blob, 0);
> - hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.secctx_to_secid, list) {
> - rc = hp->hook.secctx_to_secid(secdata, seclen,
> - &blob->secid[hp->slot]);
> - if (rc != 0)
> - return rc;
> - }
> + hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.secctx_to_secid, list)
> + if (*display == LSMBLOB_INVALID || *display == hp->slot)
> + return hp->hook.secctx_to_secid(secdata, seclen,
> + &blob->secid[hp->slot]);
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_secctx_to_secid);
>
> void security_release_secctx(char *secdata, u32 seclen)
> {
> - call_void_hook(release_secctx, secdata, seclen);
> + struct security_hook_list *hp;
> + int *display = current->security;
> +
> + hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.release_secctx, list)
> + if (*display == LSMBLOB_INVALID || *display == hp->slot) {
> + hp->hook.release_secctx(secdata, seclen);
> + return;
> + }
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_release_secctx);
>
> @@ -2164,8 +2225,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_sock_rcv_skb);
> int security_socket_getpeersec_stream(struct socket *sock, char __user *optval,
> int __user *optlen, unsigned len)
> {
> - return call_int_hook(socket_getpeersec_stream, -ENOPROTOOPT, sock,
> - optval, optlen, len);
> + int *display = current->security;
> + struct security_hook_list *hp;
> +
> + hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.socket_getpeersec_stream,
> + list)
> + if (*display == LSMBLOB_INVALID || *display == hp->slot)
> + return hp->hook.socket_getpeersec_stream(sock, optval,
> + optlen, len);
> + return -ENOPROTOOPT;
> }
>
> int security_socket_getpeersec_dgram(struct socket *sock, struct sk_buff *skb,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-24 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-21 18:52 [PATCH v3 00/24] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 01/24] LSM: Infrastructure management of the superblock Casey Schaufler
2019-06-24 18:31 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 02/24] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2019-06-24 18:33 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 03/24] LSM: Infrastructure management of the key blob Casey Schaufler
2019-06-24 18:33 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 04/24] LSM: Create and manage the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:42 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 18:38 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 05/24] Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:43 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 18:39 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 06/24] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:43 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 18:38 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 07/24] net: Prepare UDS for secuirty module stacking Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:43 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 18:39 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 08/24] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:44 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 18:38 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 09/24] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:44 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 18:39 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 10/24] Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:48 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 16:39 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-24 17:20 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-24 21:09 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 18:39 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 11/24] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:49 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 18:40 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 12/24] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:49 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 18:40 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 13/24] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:50 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 18:40 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 14/24] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:51 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 18:40 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 15/24] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:51 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 18:48 ` John Johansen [this message]
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 16/24] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:52 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 21:46 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 17/24] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:52 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 21:46 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 18/24] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_dentry_init_security Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:54 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 21:46 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 19/24] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:56 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 21:46 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 20/24] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:57 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 21:47 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 21/24] Audit: Store LSM audit information in an lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 23:12 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 21:33 ` John Johansen
2019-06-25 1:01 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-25 1:46 ` Paul Moore
2019-06-25 1:46 ` Paul Moore
2019-06-25 2:14 ` John Johansen
2019-06-25 2:14 ` John Johansen
2019-06-25 2:42 ` Paul Moore
2019-06-25 2:42 ` Paul Moore
2019-06-25 15:30 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-25 15:30 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 22/24] LSM: Return the lsmblob slot on initialization Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 23:13 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 21:39 ` John Johansen
2019-06-24 21:50 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 21:53 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-24 21:47 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 23/24] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 23:15 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 21:44 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 24/24] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 23:15 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 21:45 ` John Johansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eb2c3cd3-0de4-807a-ec67-3f11a83cb100@canonical.com \
--to=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.