All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
To: "André Almeida" <andrealmeid@collabora.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Darren Hart" <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: kernel@collabora.com, krisman@collabora.com,
	pgriffais@valvesoftware.com, z.figura12@gmail.com,
	joel@joelfernandes.org, malteskarupke@fastmail.fm,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, fweimer@redhat.com,
	libc-alpha@sourceware.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	shuah@kernel.org, acme@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
	io-uring <io-uring@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/13] Add futex2 syscall
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2021 12:34:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ecbed98e-882a-0c0e-d4e1-bd33960f3674@samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210304004219.134051-1-andrealmeid@collabora.com>


Hi André,
>  ** The wait on multiple problem
> 
>  The use case lies in the Wine implementation of the Windows NT interface
>  WaitMultipleObjects. This Windows API function allows a thread to sleep
>  waiting on the first of a set of event sources (mutexes, timers, signal,
>  console input, etc) to signal.  

With that in mind would it be good to have some interaction with epoll (and similar calls)?

Instead of having a blocked futex_waitv() waiting on an fd (maybe a generic eventfd() or a new futex2fd())
would be a better interface?

Or instead introduce an IORING_OP_FUTEX2_WAITV? Then the futex_waitv logic wait
in an io-wq kernel thread...

I guess the io_uring way would mean we could have that in mind as future addition, which can be implemented
later...

metze

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-07 11:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-04  0:42 [RFC PATCH v2 00/13] Add futex2 syscall André Almeida
2021-03-04  0:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/13] futex2: Implement wait and wake functions André Almeida
2021-03-04  0:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/13] futex2: Add support for shared futexes André Almeida
2021-03-04  0:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/13] futex2: Implement vectorized wait André Almeida
2021-03-04  0:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/13] futex2: Implement requeue operation André Almeida
2021-03-04  0:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/13] futex2: Add compatibility entry point for x86_x32 ABI André Almeida
2021-03-04  0:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/13] docs: locking: futex2: Add documentation André Almeida
2021-03-04  0:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/13] selftests: futex2: Add wake/wait test André Almeida
2021-03-04  0:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/13] selftests: futex2: Add timeout test André Almeida
2021-03-04  0:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/13] selftests: futex2: Add wouldblock test André Almeida
2021-03-04  0:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/13] selftests: futex2: Add waitv test André Almeida
2021-03-04  0:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/13] selftests: futex2: Add requeue test André Almeida
2021-03-04  0:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/13] perf bench: Add futex2 benchmark tests André Almeida
2021-03-04  0:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/13] kernel: Enable waitpid() for futex2 André Almeida
2021-03-04  5:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/13] Add futex2 syscall Peter Oskolkov
2021-03-04 18:58   ` André Almeida
2021-03-05 20:03     ` Peter Oskolkov
2021-03-05 20:08       ` Peter Oskolkov
2021-03-04 15:01 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-03-04 19:15   ` André Almeida
2021-03-07 11:34 ` Stefan Metzmacher [this message]
2021-03-07 11:56   ` Daurnimator
2021-03-08 11:52     ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-08 11:11   ` David Laight
2021-03-08 11:55     ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-08 16:18 ` Zebediah Figura
2021-03-08 17:33   ` David Laight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ecbed98e-882a-0c0e-d4e1-bd33960f3674@samba.org \
    --to=metze@samba.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrealmeid@collabora.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=krisman@collabora.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=malteskarupke@fastmail.fm \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pgriffais@valvesoftware.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=z.figura12@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.