From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
"Wei Liu" <wl@xen.org>, "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 02/10] tools/libxc: Simplify xc_get_static_cpu_featuremask()
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:27:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f5c9768a-134e-25c2-0c1f-f8f89242ea0d@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16cc367a-28e0-4b20-80d0-c82ef9093f64@citrix.com>
On 27/02/2020 09:55, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> + BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(masks[0]) != FEATURESET_NR_ENTRIES);
>> Isn't this quite pointless with the now changed definition of
>> the array?
> I'd need to double check
Double check says it isn't necessary. I'll drop.
~Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-27 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-26 20:22 [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/10] x86: Default vs Max policies Andrew Cooper
2020-02-26 20:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 01/10] x86/sysctl: Don't return cpu policy data for compiled-out support (2) Andrew Cooper
2020-02-27 7:38 ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-27 9:33 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-02-27 9:40 ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-27 16:24 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-02-26 20:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 02/10] tools/libxc: Simplify xc_get_static_cpu_featuremask() Andrew Cooper
2020-02-27 7:47 ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-27 9:55 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-02-27 16:27 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2020-02-26 20:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 03/10] x86/gen-cpuid: Rework internal logic to ease future changes Andrew Cooper
2020-02-27 7:57 ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-27 10:08 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-02-26 20:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/10] x86/gen-cpuid: Create max and default variations of INIT_*_FEATURES Andrew Cooper
2020-02-27 8:02 ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-27 10:29 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-02-27 10:34 ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-26 20:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 05/10] x86/msr: Compile out unused logic/objects Andrew Cooper
2020-02-27 8:07 ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-27 10:37 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-02-27 11:24 ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-26 20:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 06/10] x86/msr: Introduce and use default MSR policies Andrew Cooper
2020-02-27 8:11 ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-26 20:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 07/10] x86/cpuid: Compile out unused logic/objects Andrew Cooper
2020-02-27 8:12 ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-26 20:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 08/10] x86/cpuid: Introduce and use default CPUID policies Andrew Cooper
2020-02-27 8:19 ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-27 10:55 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-02-27 11:29 ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-26 20:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 09/10] x86/gen-cpuid: Distinguish default vs max in feature annotations Andrew Cooper
2020-02-27 8:21 ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-26 20:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 10/10] x86/hvm: Do not enable MPX by default Andrew Cooper
2020-02-27 8:23 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f5c9768a-134e-25c2-0c1f-f8f89242ea0d@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.