From: "Lisovskiy, Stanislav" <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
To: "Vudum, Lakshminarayana" <lakshminarayana.vudum@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Saarinen, Jani" <jani.saarinen@intel.com>,
"Navare, Manasi D" <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK (rev15)
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 08:44:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f9f90111abed4bb59b89f9a58cd6b8ed@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <817306d801194374a51cfb1931c5d363@intel.com>
Thank you Lakshmi!
Best Regards,
Lisovskiy Stanislav
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
________________________________________
From: Vudum, Lakshminarayana
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 11:43:26 AM
To: Lisovskiy, Stanislav; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Saarinen, Jani; Navare, Manasi D
Subject: RE: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK (rev15)
Filed a new bug and Re-reported.
-----Original Message-----
From: Lisovskiy, Stanislav <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 9:22 AM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Vudum, Lakshminarayana <lakshminarayana.vudum@intel.com>; Saarinen, Jani <jani.saarinen@intel.com>; Navare, Manasi D <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK (rev15)
Self test failure as usual. And as usual not related to the patch.
Best Regards,
Lisovskiy Stanislav
________________________________________
From: Patchwork <patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 2:59 AM
To: Lisovskiy, Stanislav
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK (rev15)
== Series Details ==
Series: Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK (rev15)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/74739/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8506 -> Patchwork_17718 ====================================================
Summary
-------
**FAILURE**
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_17718 absolutely need to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_17718, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17718/index.html
Possible new issues
-------------------
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_17718:
### IGT changes ###
#### Possible regressions ####
* igt@i915_selftest@live@client:
- fi-bsw-kefka: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2]
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8506/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@i915_selftest@live@client.html
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17718/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@i915_selftest@live@client.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_17718 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload:
- fi-glk-dsi: [PASS][3] -> [TIMEOUT][4] ([i915#1288])
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8506/fi-glk-dsi/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17718/fi-glk-dsi/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists:
- fi-kbl-guc: [PASS][5] -> [INCOMPLETE][6] ([i915#1874])
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8506/fi-kbl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists.html
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17718/fi-kbl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists.html
* igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast:
- fi-kbl-7500u: [PASS][7] -> [FAIL][8] ([i915#227])
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8506/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17718/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists:
- fi-kbl-8809g: [INCOMPLETE][9] ([i915#1874]) -> [PASS][10]
[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8506/fi-kbl-8809g/igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists.html
[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17718/fi-kbl-8809g/igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists.html
[i915#1288]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1288
[i915#1874]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1874
[i915#227]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/227
Participating hosts (49 -> 44)
------------------------------
Additional (1): fi-kbl-7560u
Missing (6): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-byt-clapper fi-bdw-samus
Build changes
-------------
* Linux: CI_DRM_8506 -> Patchwork_17718
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_8506: d6a73e9084ff6adfabbad014bc294d254484f304 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_5661: a772a7c7a761c6125bc0af5284ad603478107737 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_17718: 2be3fecc6320f61ccbd0898132dcb7eedae7640b @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
== Linux commits ==
2be3fecc6320 drm/i915: Remove unneeded hack now for CDCLK b74b713c823f drm/i915: Adjust CDCLK accordingly to our DBuf bw needs
2405cfa20a90 drm/i915: Introduce for_each_dbuf_slice_in_mask macro
4765b732c387 drm/i915: Plane configuration affects CDCLK in Gen11+
cc857a15d370 drm/i915: Check plane configuration properly
a2e2a5f43cd7 drm/i915: Extract cdclk requirements checking to separate function
42922a1cf4d9 drm/i915: Decouple cdclk calculation from modeset checks
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17718/index.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-20 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-19 13:11 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 0/7] Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-19 13:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 1/7] drm/i915: Decouple cdclk calculation from modeset checks Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-19 13:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 2/7] drm/i915: Extract cdclk requirements checking to separate function Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-19 13:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 3/7] drm/i915: Check plane configuration properly Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-20 14:58 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-19 13:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 4/7] drm/i915: Plane configuration affects CDCLK in Gen11+ Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-20 14:59 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-19 13:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 5/7] drm/i915: Introduce for_each_dbuf_slice_in_mask macro Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-19 13:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 6/7] drm/i915: Adjust CDCLK accordingly to our DBuf bw needs Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-19 21:25 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-19 23:55 ` Manasi Navare
2020-05-20 15:00 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-19 13:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 7/7] drm/i915: Remove unneeded hack now for CDCLK Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-19 17:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK (rev14) Patchwork
2020-05-19 23:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK (rev15) Patchwork
2020-05-19 23:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-05-19 23:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-05-20 6:22 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-05-20 8:43 ` Vudum, Lakshminarayana
2020-05-20 8:44 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav [this message]
2020-05-20 8:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-05-20 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK (rev18) Patchwork
2020-05-20 15:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-05-20 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-05-20 19:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK (rev15) Patchwork
2020-05-21 6:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK (rev18) Patchwork
2020-05-21 9:35 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-05-21 21:02 ` Vudum, Lakshminarayana
2020-05-22 22:00 ` Chris Wilson
2020-05-22 23:18 ` Chris Wilson
2020-05-25 8:00 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-05-25 8:03 ` Chris Wilson
2020-05-25 8:07 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-05-25 8:09 ` Chris Wilson
2020-05-25 8:14 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-05-21 21:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success " Patchwork
2020-05-21 21:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 0/7] Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK Manasi Navare
2020-05-21 22:17 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f9f90111abed4bb59b89f9a58cd6b8ed@intel.com \
--to=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.saarinen@intel.com \
--cc=lakshminarayana.vudum@intel.com \
--cc=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.