From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@suse.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] xen: credit2: limit the number of CPUs per runqueue
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 14:08:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe24d520-7ef8-7dd7-6aa8-64df3a55b0bb@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159070133878.12060.13318432301910522647.stgit@Palanthas>
On 28.05.2020 23:29, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> Dario Faggioli (7):
> xen: credit2: factor cpu to runqueue matching in a function
> xen: credit2: factor runqueue initialization in its own function.
> xen: cpupool: add a back-pointer from a scheduler to its pool
> xen: credit2: limit the max number of CPUs in a runqueue
> xen: credit2: compute cpus per-runqueue more dynamically.
> cpupool: create an the 'cpupool sync' infrastructure
> xen: credit2: rebalance the number of CPUs in the scheduler runqueues
I still have the last three patches here as well as "xen: credit2:
document that min_rqd is valid and ok to use" in my "waiting for
sufficient acks" folder. Would you mind indicating if they should
stay there (and you will take care of pinging or whatever is
needed), or whether I may drop them (and you'll eventually re-
submit)?
Thanks, Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-21 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-28 21:29 [PATCH v2 0/7] xen: credit2: limit the number of CPUs per runqueue Dario Faggioli
2020-05-28 21:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] xen: credit2: factor cpu to runqueue matching in a function Dario Faggioli
2020-05-29 14:48 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-05-28 21:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] xen: credit2: factor runqueue initialization in its own function Dario Faggioli
2020-05-29 14:50 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-05-28 21:29 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] xen: cpupool: add a back-pointer from a scheduler to its pool Dario Faggioli
2020-05-29 14:54 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-05-29 14:56 ` Dario Faggioli
2020-05-28 21:29 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] xen: credit2: limit the max number of CPUs in a runqueue Dario Faggioli
2020-05-29 15:23 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-05-29 15:36 ` Dario Faggioli
2020-05-28 21:29 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] xen: credit2: compute cpus per-runqueue more dynamically Dario Faggioli
2020-05-28 21:29 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] cpupool: create an the 'cpupool sync' infrastructure Dario Faggioli
2020-05-28 21:30 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] xen: credit2: rebalance the number of CPUs in the scheduler runqueues Dario Faggioli
2020-07-21 12:08 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2020-07-22 15:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] xen: credit2: limit the number of CPUs per runqueue Dario Faggioli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fe24d520-7ef8-7dd7-6aa8-64df3a55b0bb@suse.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=dfaggioli@suse.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=julien@xen.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.