From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B45EC6FA9D for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2023 16:16:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229708AbjCAQQg (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Mar 2023 11:16:36 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37028 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229620AbjCAQQf (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Mar 2023 11:16:35 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com (mail-wr1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::432]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40E09457C0 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2023 08:16:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id h11so2074901wrm.5 for ; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 08:16:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:to:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=39bDRNo7Wc09exBJ/yMxD8FqXo/2aTySYhQkWsDqlAE=; b=Kgu9ChttcLMvLr98MduyKvSu+8LAysGnj97+ludErayzfK1F2JXvHHh2Wj5NVmhp+R /j+l+ufXrcUAPpF96WNFaFLIg/27bL9TRDVFi1uPWnVM+NGFhFWl/dmlMZnVn6+018/T iwhqd6smBgfAi1C6KiGLC0bBlqELW3NbxkjpiL0BKSAy/4sFcxx6mCUFNJJflOnDNe9f omPo6ahEfhuLxla7Rj5/JuLSI3v6GtuaXUqbbE9ydwXDs6y/oS+sSlv+w2DsJoFRJRtl J+ehkdb6qNARjNTe0OHC7F7WFhLqZABcMlPWpJ8P+/Oem20dT+rxQYxMBjBMccFZDMAm 3GrQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:to:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=39bDRNo7Wc09exBJ/yMxD8FqXo/2aTySYhQkWsDqlAE=; b=b02I2sFIRjSoPQrP+DqQB171MVFQDX+WLAi74SBU5NZeS31FoJ9G9XmM/9lxw32a4c gHvrWh/Ogg/yjU1WHNQOrGwThiVrB0vjxGuRrbMbRY4SGMVYz0p19T118n1thOUWQbEO kfjvcugSamDuhzaATONwvZjHvyf66wdEj6xvWHqptesTiVUkbxLVWgoQMD4CwSgM80qp urn59VPShlIX+SWhc2XvCewJa8JvZ/IHN1ZWErdmycgb/ThNEycJ5eNp9O5POT069AIQ IQooN9rAwckplEU1wuTlTKXWrdLL9LMNxFd/+PLO+XchRB7klHVWy4qCCrGyTkiIkD9R lasA== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXBaHTwPrtwZGZn4gmHNTYfZu72aahbcnHM5fO3le6wfA/cnyKS nAlV2ejtA4ZXbH7DbNKQKo4zRAaUeTKfYw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set9bA9sadI3S30pXMjU9pErJ7PS8CEjGIezafBsy1QTJ0XHBipsikpoJnkuyyuDMT1UFkhdeww== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:106:b0:2c9:993a:f4db with SMTP id o6-20020a056000010600b002c9993af4dbmr5900918wrx.7.1677687392664; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 08:16:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.65.149.89] ([165.1.187.221]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u5-20020a5d6ac5000000b002c5a1bd5280sm12845301wrw.95.2023.03.01.08.16.32 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Mar 2023 08:16:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <40cbe297-f8ed-f4a1-b60a-f4aa2adef995@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 17:16:31 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 To: fio@vger.kernel.org From: Thomas Schneider <74cmonty@gmail.com> Subject: Using fio with adjusted parameters for use case "Hana DB" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: fio@vger.kernel.org Hello Vincent, I'm starting evaluating usage of fio . My goal is to benchmark different storage device types, e.g. SSD and shared storage, that is close to the I/O workload generated by the "real" application: Hana DB. But before defining this "application related benchmark" I would run a generic benchmark first that gives an idea of the IO performance of the relevant storage device; this generic benchmark is using options that are well known to deliver meaningful results with an acceptable (short) runtime. The idea behind this strategy is: If the generic benchmark already indicates poor IO performance, there's no need to execute another benchmark that simulates the "real" application. Could you please share some information of this generic benchmark(s) for devices SSD, RAID and NFS share (e.g. NetApp, EMC)? Regards Thomas