From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C2FC11D05 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:31:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F85208CD for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:31:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=toxicpanda-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@toxicpanda-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="CPRsSGPA" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727709AbgBTPbG (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Feb 2020 10:31:06 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f196.google.com ([209.85.160.196]:37104 "EHLO mail-qt1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728351AbgBTPbG (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Feb 2020 10:31:06 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f196.google.com with SMTP id w47so3133103qtk.4 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 07:31:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toxicpanda-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nnmw0tGtYQqxRyjy+xxbIOE5S8uiG8p2Limc9Tq4QsI=; b=CPRsSGPAUtbgnqySLr+rnI6453uc+mKj/Y72WpIhnqviShoLl74TEgdEWva17WTUL1 gx0KtCfDVg/kfFoM3aU3xh3KP0fSCMQ/Yf7qwIxlytQCTN87TmNCnghQ03pb4NxrF/H1 an3mecKHDPJ/O0gL+mhjdUou6GMmmaQBVePgCVACNqTryifaMQ3PhrqLyvRKCDTOxnaQ ZGJ1XyxE1llR/zubPBkT1o5Fk0sux+5TyvrfUgk03GhwfBnZbWA+toQNWypigI/nbuSU +LptlP0cP6jRGcP4ShBb+I6Mh47lZB917UW/HDvb7umFis47wruZ8FxIM4QUEhbmkks3 /5sg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nnmw0tGtYQqxRyjy+xxbIOE5S8uiG8p2Limc9Tq4QsI=; b=AE1tvgr7WOZem/jCxUUHo34VvsrXL84m3ED2thPh2iN/7TrEgWwv5h7q1bbQus4BWa Z27M87qZq+nECrSWFzL9tbPX2gMb0y43afDjiZZPk5ElDhPBHk2MeLfDhBZY4NCu+Zk5 ff/n+CEb4NZmHUcOc/C0i/7oowtEAZcoQDbihPzrZXTBJToaJ/GGEG2fMEWVQ2ID4wRB pRenZC/+NL77H65ucoRuNmEmZZOU/K+aCfkgMfWp8Syu6hNIxa4AWgzo8s3DEjiTRKVg Y3j5nWsYmLadif9g+nDe8GBNt9HM+pie5w2/9Exoqww7B0qfwqho/V+AgfYY4Kuo31z6 kPeA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWHp2RGxwLsLFZHtEgbjnU18au0jhrqfr6vLwNlv46JZu08QeZZ NAbo7z4hvQNf0TwZOjLrYxTyqg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwot6aiZI2yUoirkt9rkstu/U9fw/CLvK0IGidiOXHvJhUR39rSBZBR+KJ+NWm93pH5vsVrug== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4085:: with SMTP id p5mr26974541qtl.132.1582212665210; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 07:31:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.106] ([107.15.81.208]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u13sm1901487qtg.64.2020.02.20.07.31.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 20 Feb 2020 07:31:04 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs/112: remove some tests for cloning inline extents To: fdmanana@kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Filipe Manana References: <20200219140627.1641733-1-fdmanana@kernel.org> From: Josef Bacik Message-ID: <1e900857-d2f5-b02f-07c7-1d81062523ca@toxicpanda.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 10:31:03 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200219140627.1641733-1-fdmanana@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: fstests-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: fstests@vger.kernel.org On 2/19/20 9:06 AM, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote: > From: Filipe Manana > > This test case, btrfs/112, tests that some clone operations that have a > range covering inline extents fail with either -EOPNOTSUPP or -EINVAL. > These cases were unsupported on btrfs because they used to lead to file > corruptions and were not trivial to implement. > > But there's now a patchset that adds support for them, and the relevant > patch of that patchset has the following subject: > > "Btrfs: implement full reflink support for inline extents" > > So just remove these tests from test case btrfs/112, since this test > case is about testing only the unsupported reflink operations. A new > test case that verifies that these cases now work, as long as some other > new cases, will follow in another patch. > > Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Thanks, Josef