fstests.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: david@fromorbit.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	fstests@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/17] xfs: run xfs_repair at the end of each test
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 17:15:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160803091542.GM27776@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <146914481474.11762.2741429828012981240.stgit@birch.djwong.org>

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:46:54PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Run xfs_repair twice at the end of each test -- once to rebuild
> the btree indices, and again with -n to check the rebuild work.

Seems like it's two more xfs_repair, three in total :)

> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
>  README    |    4 ++++
>  common/rc |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/README b/README
> index 2647e12..4509cc1 100644
> --- a/README
> +++ b/README
> @@ -80,6 +80,10 @@ Preparing system for tests (IRIX and Linux):
>                 added to the end of fsstresss and fsx invocations, respectively,
>                 in case you wish to exclude certain operational modes from these
>                 tests.
> +             - set TEST_XFS_REPAIR_REBUILD=1 to have _check_xfs_filesystem
> +               run xfs_repair -n to check the filesystem; xfs_repair to rebuild
> +               metadata indexes; and xfs_repair -n (a third time) to check the
> +               results of the rebuilding.
>  
>          - or add a case to the switch in common/config assigning
>            these variables based on the hostname of your test
> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> index 7c79bf8..3b45578 100644
> --- a/common/rc
> +++ b/common/rc
> @@ -2428,6 +2428,36 @@ _check_xfs_filesystem()
>          ok=0
>      fi
>  
> +    if [ -n "$TEST_XFS_REPAIR_REBUILD" ]; then
> +        $XFS_REPAIR_PROG -n $extra_options $extra_log_options $extra_rt_options $device >$tmp.repair 2>&1
> +        if [ $? -ne 0 ]
> +        then
> +            echo "_check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on $device is inconsistent (r) (see $seqres.full)"
> +
> +            echo "_check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on $device is inconsistent" >>$seqres.full
> +            echo "*** xfs_repair -n output ***"	>>$seqres.full
> +            cat $tmp.repair | _fix_malloc		>>$seqres.full
> +            echo "*** end xfs_repair output"	>>$seqres.full
> +
> +            ok=0
> +        fi
> +        rm -f $tmp.fs_check $tmp.logprint $tmp.repair
> +
> +        $XFS_REPAIR_PROG $extra_options $extra_log_options $extra_rt_options $device >$tmp.repair 2>&1
> +        if [ $? -ne 0 ]
> +        then
> +            echo "_check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on $device is inconsistent (r) (see $seqres.full)"
> +
> +            echo "_check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on $device is inconsistent" >>$seqres.full
> +            echo "*** xfs_repair -n output ***"	>>$seqres.full
> +            cat $tmp.repair | _fix_malloc		>>$seqres.full
> +            echo "*** end xfs_repair output"	>>$seqres.full
> +
> +            ok=0
> +        fi
> +        rm -f $tmp.fs_check $tmp.logprint $tmp.repair
> +    fi
> +

I think we can move this hunk after the original xfs_repair and swap the
xfs_repair order, i.e.

xfs_repair -n # this is the original repair check
if <check_rebuild>; then
	xfs_repair # do rebuild without -n
	xfs_repair -n # check rebuild result
fi

This seems more clear to me and we can mark which repair is failing more
easily (right now the three xfs_repairs are all marked as "(r)", it's
hard to say which one is failing), e.g.

xfs_repair -n # marked as "(r)", means "repair"
if <check_rebuild>; then
	xfs_repair # mark as "(rb)", means "rebuild"?
	xfs_repair -n # mark as "(rr)", means "repair rebuild"?
fi

Thanks,
Eryu

>      $XFS_REPAIR_PROG -n $extra_options $extra_log_options $extra_rt_options $device >$tmp.repair 2>&1
>      if [ $? -ne 0 ]
>      then
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-03  9:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-21 23:46 [PATCH v7 00/17] xfstests: fixes and new tests for rmap/reflink/etc Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:46 ` [PATCH 01/17] xfs/26[34]: remove duplicate tests Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01  6:25   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-21 23:46 ` [PATCH 02/17] xfs: use rmapbt-checking helper Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01  6:25   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-21 23:46 ` [PATCH 03/17] xfs/310: fix the size calculation for the huge device Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01  6:25   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-21 23:46 ` [PATCH 04/17] xfs/122: list the new log redo items Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01  6:26   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-21 23:46 ` [PATCH 05/17] common/reflink: actually test dedupe on scratch device Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01  6:26   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-21 23:46 ` [PATCH 06/17] xfs: run xfs_repair at the end of each test Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01  6:27   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-01 17:08     ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-02 12:24       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-03  9:15   ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2016-08-03 22:08     ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-03 22:45   ` [PATCH v2 06/17] xfs: optionally test xfs_repair index rebuilding " Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:47 ` [PATCH 07/17] xfs/128: cycle_mount the scratch device, not the test device Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01  6:27   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-03  9:37   ` Eryu Guan
2016-08-03 22:09     ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-03 22:48   ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:47 ` [PATCH 08/17] xfs/129: fix post-metadump remounting idiocy Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01  6:27   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-21 23:47 ` [PATCH 09/17] common/dmerror: fix mount option issues Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01  6:28   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-03 10:38   ` Eryu Guan
2016-08-03 22:14     ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-03 22:50   ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-04  0:33     ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-04  0:34   ` [PATCH v3 " Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:47 ` [PATCH 10/17] xfs/179: use scratch device helpers Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01  6:28   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-21 23:47 ` [PATCH 11/17] xfs/234: " Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01  6:29   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-21 23:47 ` [PATCH 12/17] reflink: test cross-mountpoint reflink and dedupe Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01  6:29   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-08  7:56   ` Eryu Guan
2016-08-08 17:28     ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:47 ` [PATCH 13/17] xfs: test swapext with reflink Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-08  8:13   ` Eryu Guan
2016-08-08 17:41     ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-09  6:29       ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-19 21:53         ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:47 ` [PATCH 14/17] xfs: more rmapbt tests Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-08  8:48   ` Eryu Guan
2016-08-08 17:59     ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:47 ` [PATCH 15/17] xfs: scrub fs (if still mounted) at the end of the test Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-08  8:52   ` Eryu Guan
2016-08-08 18:03     ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-21 23:48 ` [PATCH 16/17] xfs/122: add the realtime rmapbt inode and btree fields Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-01  6:30   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-21 23:48 ` [PATCH 17/17] xfs: test realtime rmapbt code Darrick J. Wong
2016-08-08  9:08   ` Eryu Guan
2016-08-08 18:18     ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160803091542.GM27776@eguan.usersys.redhat.com \
    --to=eguan@redhat.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).