From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: guaneryu@gmail.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, guan@eryu.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] common: capture metadump output if xfs filesystem check fails
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:59:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210211135958.GB222065@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <161292579087.3504537.10519481439481869013.stgit@magnolia>
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 06:56:30PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@djwong.org>
>
> Capture metadump output when various userspace repair and checker tools
> fail or indicate corruption, to aid in debugging. We don't bother to
> annotate xfs_check because it's bitrotting.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> ---
> README | 2 ++
> common/xfs | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
>
>
> diff --git a/README b/README
> index 43bb0cee..36f72088 100644
> --- a/README
> +++ b/README
> @@ -109,6 +109,8 @@ Preparing system for tests:
> - Set TEST_FS_MODULE_RELOAD=1 to unload the module and reload
> it between test invocations. This assumes that the name of
> the module is the same as FSTYP.
> + - Set SNAPSHOT_CORRUPT_XFS=1 to record compressed metadumps of XFS
> + filesystems if the various stages of _check_xfs_filesystem fail.
>
> - or add a case to the switch in common/config assigning
> these variables based on the hostname of your test
> diff --git a/common/xfs b/common/xfs
> index 2156749d..ad1eb6ee 100644
> --- a/common/xfs
> +++ b/common/xfs
> @@ -432,6 +432,21 @@ _supports_xfs_scrub()
> return 0
> }
>
> +# Save a compressed snapshot of a corrupt xfs filesystem for later debugging.
> +_snapshot_xfs() {
The term snapshot has a well known meaning. Can we just call this
_metadump_xfs()?
> + local metadump="$1"
> + local device="$2"
> + local logdev="$3"
> + local options="-a -o"
> +
> + if [ "$logdev" != "none" ]; then
> + options="$options -l $logdev"
> + fi
> +
> + $XFS_METADUMP_PROG $options "$device" "$metadump" >> "$seqres.full" 2>&1
> + gzip -f "$metadump" >> "$seqres.full" 2>&1 &
Why compress in the background? I wonder if we should just skip the
compression step since this requires an option to enable in the first
place..
> +}
> +
> # run xfs_check and friends on a FS.
> _check_xfs_filesystem()
> {
...
> @@ -540,6 +564,8 @@ _check_xfs_filesystem()
> cat $tmp.repair >>$seqres.full
> echo "*** end xfs_repair output" >>$seqres.full
>
> + test "$SNAPSHOT_CORRUPT_XFS" = "1" && \
> + _snapshot_xfs "$seqres.rebuildrepair.md" "$device" "$2"
Why do we collect so many metadump images? Shouldn't all but the last
TEST_XFS_REPAIR_REBUILD thing not modify the fs? If so, it seems like we
should be able to collect one image (and perhaps just call it
"$seqres.$device.md") if any of the first several checks flag a problem.
Brian
> ok=0
> fi
> rm -f $tmp.repair
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-11 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-10 2:56 [PATCHSET 0/6] fstests: various improvements to the test framework Darrick J. Wong
2021-02-10 2:56 ` [PATCH 1/6] config: wrap xfs_metadump as $XFS_METADUMP_PROG like the other tools Darrick J. Wong
2021-02-11 13:58 ` Brian Foster
2021-02-10 2:56 ` [PATCH 2/6] common: capture metadump output if xfs filesystem check fails Darrick J. Wong
2021-02-11 13:59 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2021-02-11 18:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-02-11 18:35 ` Brian Foster
2021-02-11 19:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-02-10 2:56 ` [PATCH 3/6] check: allow '-e testid' to exclude a single test Darrick J. Wong
2021-02-11 14:00 ` Brian Foster
2021-02-10 2:56 ` [PATCH 4/6] check: don't abort on non-existent excluded groups Darrick J. Wong
2021-02-11 14:00 ` Brian Foster
2021-02-11 17:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-02-11 18:01 ` Brian Foster
2021-02-10 2:56 ` [PATCH 5/6] check: run tests in exactly the order specified Darrick J. Wong
2021-02-11 14:00 ` Brian Foster
2021-02-11 17:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-02-10 2:56 ` [PATCH 6/6] fuzzy: capture core dumps from repair utilities Darrick J. Wong
2021-02-11 14:00 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210211135958.GB222065@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guan@eryu.me \
--cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).