From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24FEC433B4 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 06:31:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2BC61483 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 06:31:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229588AbhDYGb4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Apr 2021 02:31:56 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:30082 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229567AbhDYGb4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Apr 2021 02:31:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1619332276; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=g76PM57L2+R001d8uGZcGXNPwNRPCvV9zBTPdtUl1qI=; b=LTNUkC9DBd79yTMIjEjoHMnDAuDI7rUsqxVIjQ49TZDzgSwYpBoNUAHrsMgqZlqNvrq6Xa Xr+7daX/pBd8Xbu3c1JOf2fYdgHOfL3u8TPPEmGgpV2wAyLTXNWVWQOeB4xP6fxpELdJs1 1KX7+ibKctj/qwT9DO7OYwj1zP0kicA= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-28-4ASlhPbZOx2gCJ3CVA1uHA-1; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 02:31:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 4ASlhPbZOx2gCJ3CVA1uHA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF35F18397A5; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 06:31:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.66.61.36]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA52B1000358; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 06:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 14:48:28 +0800 From: Zorro Lang To: Eryu Guan Cc: Christoph Hellwig , fstests@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: generic/095 and generic/300 failures Message-ID: <20210425064828.GX13946@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: Eryu Guan , Christoph Hellwig , fstests@vger.kernel.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: fstests@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 01:05:35PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 07:54:16AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > generic/095 and generic/300 have been failing for me with every config > > on every file system for a while with the following messages: > > > > --- tests/generic/095.out 2016-03-29 13:59:30.405053956 +0000 > > +++ results/generic/095.out.bad 2021-04-20 05:44:54.432081845 +0000 > > @@ -1,2 +1,7 @@ > > QA output created by 095 > > +job9: No I/O performed by mmap, perhaps try --debug=io option for details? > > +job9: No I/O performed by mmap, perhaps try --debug=io option for details? > > +job9: No I/O performed by mmap, perhaps try --debug=io option for details? > > +job9: No I/O performed by mmap, perhaps try --debug=io option for details? > > +job9: No I/O performed by mmap, perhaps try --debug=io option for details? > > Silence is golden > > > > --- tests/generic/300.out 2016-03-29 13:59:30.431720622 +0000 > > +++ results/generic/300.out.bad 2021-04-20 05:45:06.324708699 +0000 > > @@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ > > > > Run fio with random aio-dio pattern > > > > +falloc_raicer: No I/O performed by falloc, perhaps try --debug=io option for details? > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > Yeah, I've noticed these failures as well, and it seems that it's caused > by fio behavior change, as Zorro said he never hit such failures[1]. > > I'm using fio-3.7 I use fio-3.25-3. I never saw the errors you metioned above. How about CC axboe@kernel.dk (fio maintainer) if you still can reproduce this error on latest fio version? Thanks, Zorro > > # fio --version > fio-3.7-66-gedfc > > Thanks, > Eryu > > [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/fstests/msg15871.html >