From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B039C433ED for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 18:03:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487366108B for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 18:03:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1355082AbhDGSEB (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 14:04:01 -0400 Received: from sandeen.net ([63.231.237.45]:51592 "EHLO sandeen.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1355083AbhDGSEA (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 14:04:00 -0400 Received: from liberator.sandeen.net (liberator.sandeen.net [10.0.0.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sandeen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D9D99335045; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 13:02:50 -0500 (CDT) To: Pavel Reichl , fstests@vger.kernel.org Cc: zlang@redhat.com, guan@eryu.me References: <20210330220005.56019-1-preichl@redhat.com> <20210330220005.56019-5-preichl@redhat.com> From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] generic/003: Amend the test for exfat Message-ID: <47a498f6-ae69-7518-717c-8010bf917980@sandeen.net> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 13:03:49 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210330220005.56019-5-preichl@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: fstests@vger.kernel.org On 3/30/21 5:00 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote: > Update the test so it can be run even for exfat which has 2 seconds > granularity for access_time and does not have a timestamp for > metadata change. > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Reichl This looks a whole lot like what I was playing with earlier. :) Can you run it say 20 times in a row, and make sure that you don't get spurious failures by sleeping for /exactly/ the atime granularity? Thanks, -Eric