fstests.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: guaneryu@gmail.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	fstests@vger.kernel.org, guan@eryu.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: test the xfs_db path command
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 09:01:20 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <875z1er3p3.fsf@garuda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210325163321.GG4090233@magnolia>

On 25 Mar 2021 at 22:03, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 03:03:14PM +0530, Chandan Babu R wrote:
>> On 23 Mar 2021 at 09:50, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>> > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
>> >
>> > Add a new test to make sure the xfs_db path command works the way the
>> > author thinks it should.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
>> > ---
>> >  tests/xfs/917     |   98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >  tests/xfs/917.out |   19 ++++++++++
>> >  tests/xfs/group   |    1 +
>> >  3 files changed, 118 insertions(+)
>> >  create mode 100755 tests/xfs/917
>> >  create mode 100644 tests/xfs/917.out
>> >
>> >
>> > diff --git a/tests/xfs/917 b/tests/xfs/917
>> > new file mode 100755
>> > index 00000000..bf21b290
>> > --- /dev/null
>> > +++ b/tests/xfs/917
>> > @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
>> > +#! /bin/bash
>> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
>> > +# Copyright (c) 2021 Oracle.  All Rights Reserved.
>> > +#
>> > +# FS QA Test No. 917
>> > +#
>> > +# Make sure the xfs_db path command works the way the author thinks it does.
>> > +# This means that it can navigate to random inodes, fails on paths that don't
>> > +# resolve.
>> > +#
>> > +seq=`basename $0`
>> > +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
>> > +echo "QA output created by $seq"
>> > +
>> > +here=`pwd`
>> > +tmp=/tmp/$$
>> > +status=1    # failure is the default!
>> > +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
>> > +
>> > +_cleanup()
>> > +{
>> > +	cd /
>> > +	rm -f $tmp.*
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +# get standard environment, filters and checks
>> > +. ./common/rc
>> > +. ./common/filter
>> > +
>> > +# real QA test starts here
>> > +_supported_fs xfs
>> > +_require_xfs_db_command "path"
>> > +_require_scratch
>> > +
>> > +echo "Format filesystem and populate"
>> > +_scratch_mkfs > $seqres.full
>> > +_scratch_mount >> $seqres.full
>> > +
>> > +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/a
>> > +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/a/b
>> > +$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c 'pwrite 0 61' $SCRATCH_MNT/a/c >> $seqres.full
>> > +ln -s -f c $SCRATCH_MNT/a/d
>> > +mknod $SCRATCH_MNT/a/e b 8 0
>> > +ln -s -f b $SCRATCH_MNT/a/f
>> 
>> Later in the test script, there are two checks corresponding to accessibility
>> of file symlink and dir symlink. However, $SCRATCH_MNT/a/d and
>> $SCRATCH_MNT/a/f are actually referring to non-existant files since current
>> working directory at the time of invocation of ln command is the xfstests
>> directory.
>> 
>> i.e. 'c' and 'b' arguments to 'ln' command above must be qualified with
>> $SCRATCH_MNT/a/.
>
> Hm?  d and f look fine to me:
>
> $ ./check xfs/917
> $ mount /dev/sdf /opt
> $ cd /opt/a
> $ ls
> total 4
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root    6 Mar 25 09:25 b/
> -rw------- 1 root root   61 Mar 25 09:25 c
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root    1 Mar 25 09:25 d -> c
> brw-r--r-- 1 root root 8, 0 Mar 25 09:25 e
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root    1 Mar 25 09:25 f -> b/
>
> The link target is copied verbatim into the symlink, so I don't see why
> they need to be qualified?
>
> (FWIW the path command doesn't resolve symlinks, so it really only
> checks that /a/d and /a/f exist and are of type symlink.)

Sorry, I got confused. The patch looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>

-- 
chandan

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-26  3:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-23  4:20 [PATCHSET 0/2] fstests: test xfs_db directory navigation Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-23  4:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: test the xfs_db path command Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-25  9:33   ` Chandan Babu R
2021-03-25 16:33     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-26  3:31       ` Chandan Babu R [this message]
2021-03-23  4:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: test the xfs_db ls command Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-25 10:08   ` Chandan Babu R
2021-03-25 16:35     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-25 16:36   ` [PATCH v1.1 " Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-26  3:32     ` Chandan Babu R
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-10-27 19:03 [PATCH RFC 0/2] xfs_db: add minimal directory navigation Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-27 19:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: test the xfs_db path command Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=875z1er3p3.fsf@garuda \
    --to=chandanrlinux@gmail.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=guan@eryu.me \
    --cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).