fstests.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>,
	linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	fstests <fstests@vger.kernel.org>, Eryu Guan <guan@eryu.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] xfs: test upgrading filesystem to bigtime
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 12:49:32 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxgCzwxv1xYYM-k-gsHnkyWxU_KzjTHRS3RyJf775R06SQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <161715293790.2703979.8248551223530213245.stgit@magnolia>

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 4:11 AM Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
>
> Test that we can upgrade an existing filesystem to use bigtime.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> ---
>  common/xfs        |   13 +++++
>  tests/xfs/908     |   97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/xfs/908.out |   20 +++++++
>  tests/xfs/909     |  149 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/xfs/909.out |    6 ++
>  tests/xfs/group   |    2 +
>  6 files changed, 287 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100755 tests/xfs/908
>  create mode 100644 tests/xfs/908.out
>  create mode 100755 tests/xfs/909
>  create mode 100644 tests/xfs/909.out
>
>
> diff --git a/common/xfs b/common/xfs
> index 37658788..c430b3ac 100644
> --- a/common/xfs
> +++ b/common/xfs
> @@ -1152,3 +1152,16 @@ _xfs_timestamp_range()
>                         awk '{printf("%s %s", $1, $2);}'
>         fi
>  }
> +
> +_require_xfs_scratch_bigtime()
> +{
> +       _require_scratch
> +
> +       _scratch_mkfs -m bigtime=1 &>/dev/null || \
> +               _notrun "mkfs.xfs doesn't have bigtime feature"
> +       _try_scratch_mount || \
> +               _notrun "bigtime not supported by scratch filesystem type: $FSTYP"
> +       $XFS_INFO_PROG "$SCRATCH_MNT" | grep -q "bigtime=1" || \
> +               _notrun "bigtime feature not advertised on mount?"
> +       _scratch_unmount
> +}
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/908 b/tests/xfs/908
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..1ad3131a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/908
> @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +# Copyright (c) 2021 Oracle.  All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test No. 908
> +#
> +# Check that we can upgrade a filesystem to support bigtime and that inode
> +# timestamps work properly after the upgrade.
> +
> +seq=`basename $0`
> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> +
> +here=`pwd`
> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> +status=1    # failure is the default!
> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> +       cd /
> +       rm -f $tmp.*
> +}
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common/rc
> +. ./common/filter
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +_supported_fs xfs
> +_require_command "$XFS_ADMIN_PROG" "xfs_admin"
> +_require_xfs_scratch_bigtime
> +_require_xfs_repair_upgrade bigtime
> +
> +date --date='Jan 1 00:00:00 UTC 2040' > /dev/null 2>&1 || \
> +       _notrun "Userspace does not support dates past 2038."
> +
> +rm -f $seqres.full
> +
> +# Make sure we can't upgrade a V4 filesystem
> +_scratch_mkfs -m crc=0 >> $seqres.full
> +_scratch_xfs_admin -O bigtime=1 2>> $seqres.full
> +_check_scratch_xfs_features BIGTIME
> +
> +# Make sure we're required to specify a feature status
> +_scratch_mkfs -m crc=1,bigtime=0,inobtcount=0 >> $seqres.full
> +_scratch_xfs_admin -O bigtime 2>> $seqres.full
> +
> +# Can we add bigtime and inobtcount at the same time?
> +_scratch_mkfs -m crc=1,bigtime=0,inobtcount=0 >> $seqres.full
> +_scratch_xfs_admin -O bigtime=1,inobtcount=1 2>> $seqres.full
> +
> +# Format V5 filesystem without bigtime support and populate it
> +_scratch_mkfs -m crc=1,bigtime=0 >> $seqres.full
> +_scratch_xfs_db -c 'version' -c 'sb 0' -c 'p' >> $seqres.full
> +_scratch_mount >> $seqres.full
> +
> +touch -d 'Jan 9 19:19:19 UTC 1999' $SCRATCH_MNT/a
> +touch -d 'Jan 9 19:19:19 UTC 1999' $SCRATCH_MNT/b
> +ls -la $SCRATCH_MNT/* >> $seqres.full
> +
> +echo before upgrade:
> +TZ=UTC stat -c '%Y' $SCRATCH_MNT/a
> +TZ=UTC stat -c '%Y' $SCRATCH_MNT/b
> +
> +_scratch_unmount
> +_check_scratch_fs
> +
> +# Now upgrade to bigtime support
> +_scratch_xfs_admin -O bigtime=1 2>> $seqres.full
> +_check_scratch_xfs_features BIGTIME
> +_check_scratch_fs
> +_scratch_xfs_db -c 'version' -c 'sb 0' -c 'p' >> $seqres.full
> +
> +# Mount again, look at our files
> +_scratch_mount >> $seqres.full
> +ls -la $SCRATCH_MNT/* >> $seqres.full
> +
> +# Modify one of the timestamps to stretch beyond 2038
> +touch -d 'Feb 22 22:22:22 UTC 2222' $SCRATCH_MNT/b
> +
> +echo after upgrade:

There is an oddity in the output.
The text says "after upgrade" but the timestampt of b has changed because
it is really "after upgrade and stretch". Did you mean to print to output
"after upgrade" and then again "after upgrade and stretch"?

Thanks,
Amir.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-31  9:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-31  1:08 [PATCHSET 0/4] fstests: widen timestamps to deal with y2038+ Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-31  1:08 ` [PATCH 1/4] generic: check userspace handling of extreme timestamps Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-31  1:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs/122: add legacy timestamps to ondisk checker Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-31  1:08 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: detect time limits from filesystem Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-31  1:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: test upgrading filesystem to bigtime Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-31  9:49   ` Amir Goldstein [this message]
2021-03-31 15:56     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-11 13:40   ` Eryu Guan
2021-04-12 17:43     ` Darrick J. Wong
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-04-21  0:23 [PATCHSET v4 0/4] fstests: widen timestamps to deal with y2038+ Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-21  0:23 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: test upgrading filesystem to bigtime Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-21  6:18   ` Amir Goldstein
2021-04-21 16:41     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-22 21:16   ` Allison Henderson
2021-04-25  7:21   ` Eryu Guan
2021-04-25 15:42     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-27 19:03 [PATCH RFC v6 0/4] xfstests: widen timestamps to deal with y2038+ Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-27 19:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: test upgrading filesystem to bigtime Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-29 13:06   ` Amir Goldstein
2020-10-29 18:22     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-17 23:00 [PATCH RFC 0/4] xfstests: widen timestamps to deal with y2038 Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-17 23:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: test upgrading filesystem to bigtime Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-18  6:16   ` Amir Goldstein
2020-08-18 18:23     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-18 18:40       ` Amir Goldstein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAOQ4uxgCzwxv1xYYM-k-gsHnkyWxU_KzjTHRS3RyJf775R06SQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=guan@eryu.me \
    --cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).