From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F4DC433DF for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 19:18:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B234520734 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 19:18:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Mx6Xk62i" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728077AbgFATS5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jun 2020 15:18:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48946 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726751AbgFATS4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jun 2020 15:18:56 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd42.google.com (mail-io1-xd42.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d42]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 998E9C061A0E; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 12:18:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd42.google.com with SMTP id c8so8139766iob.6; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 12:18:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XolEYQBGLUcuZLQYRvwjytQlMW5T0LQIpbm33QF6JpY=; b=Mx6Xk62iXBpEQD91uw1p2rVckabam2O4YAB7ZCuyQlDjiZOf+qjAmtLo1s8Lw7wgmp LbXA92pg0BguBHtoDDMGKquU38zyjc6lWFXzGuhxBWhgnIymRLcCI4vHPBxxw+8iniFD Lei5L/iK8hxXM8wDhUndxst3nWZ9+CPiAbXeCFODobREKk+9ysIF64477stp4Ta//AE6 CtmekJL72xSZ8mX0q8Hlgq7xYCWQ9JMmjWO7II/ruGxAvCWbWuWPBOZK4Ew25hlygOSP Vy76vG8CjqPDKFUqyTJV+SUF3pM4iwIINzl+0gHvZekf54S0Wp2dDOKlEGmA+FAlF2iC L3Mg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XolEYQBGLUcuZLQYRvwjytQlMW5T0LQIpbm33QF6JpY=; b=T9TkkDUbudjg06W2+BUpL1IDRyIAWOIo58sKdZs27/xg5DVkHbwyZ5oz8YPSU6fc/f GtIq/WVakUUumttjYfaX5bGdp8+O3+IQU4lud4lMxvPIzV/0hAARlqiCQGniz0HmQRi7 6sK73uF23oIU6nbrLPpb5y5dnvhVSSNbuvqnrcZR0uG9XDmhSaQmWX9M4XGllkHh15AY YNnex1rj6gB2ZTDrSdJfYhoS7seFNrVwaiSeFmzwwek7dslzP4pwg8ulK5/jfxT7n+ke ifO6s+BtJ/gI1Aq4RkDXoLrYedPXBQYxEjkBJaxcqIcE63eFi9KDmtk7F5KxRLm0XX3U uXeQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532csSQ3SE+s1VzzSJ8+AkBzdrW1YiuEL0SA28klZw/OQmMvG2Xl 1aZRjMJEsYaLd01Ekfu/MzaQEr4wK6P9saKSnP0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxEkRVYkG+MPX62XuVqybyH4Jluly+d2nvshfxoLWUHj6je0yV/rqO1TQDSH+PDjtSlT7QWs5wIRH6D0AZlQ2Y= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2437:: with SMTP id g23mr20291271iob.5.1591039135996; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 12:18:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200531110156.6613-1-amir73il@gmail.com> <20200601175219.GE3219@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200601175219.GE3219@redhat.com> From: Amir Goldstein Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 22:18:44 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Running unionmount testsuite from xfstests To: Vivek Goyal Cc: Eryu Guan , Miklos Szeredi , overlayfs , fstests Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: fstests-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: fstests@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 8:52 PM Vivek Goyal wrote: > > On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 02:01:53PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > > Eryu, > > > > unionmount testsuite has a lot more test coverage than the overlay > > xfstests, but it has a lot less exposure to testers. > > > > The various test setups that I have added to unionmount testsuite since > > I took over the maintanace of the testsuite have even smaller exposure > > to testers. > > > > These patches add overlay tests that are used as a harness to run > > different setups of unionmount testsuite. I have been using this method > > for over two year for testing my overlayfs branches. > > Hi Amir, > > Is there a git branch somewhere with these changes. Its easier to pull > that one in and test. > Of course. Forgot to mention. https://github.com/amir73il/xfstests/commits/unionmount Thanks, Amir.