fstests.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: guaneryu@gmail.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	fstests@vger.kernel.org, guan@eryu.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] xfs: test that the needsrepair feature works as advertised
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:25:05 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YIFdEWV5StltoTBQ@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210421203746.GE3122235@magnolia>

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 01:37:46PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 01:29:36PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 05:22:41PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> > > 
> > > Make sure that the needsrepair feature flag can be cleared only by
> > > repair and that mounts are prohibited when the feature is set.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > >  common/xfs        |   28 ++++++++++++++++++
> > >  tests/xfs/768     |   80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  tests/xfs/768.out |    4 +++
> > >  tests/xfs/770     |   83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  tests/xfs/770.out |    2 +
> > >  tests/xfs/group   |    2 +
> > >  6 files changed, 199 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100755 tests/xfs/768
> > >  create mode 100644 tests/xfs/768.out
> > >  create mode 100755 tests/xfs/770
> > >  create mode 100644 tests/xfs/770.out
> > > 
> > > 
...
> > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/770 b/tests/xfs/770
> > > new file mode 100755
> > > index 00000000..40e67ab5
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/tests/xfs/770
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
> > > +#! /bin/bash
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> > > +# Copyright (c) 2021 Oracle.  All Rights Reserved.
> > > +#
> > > +# FS QA Test No. 770
> > > +#
> > > +# Populate a filesystem with all types of metadata, then run repair with the
> > > +# libxfs write failure trigger set to go after a single write.  Check that the
> > > +# injected error trips, causing repair to abort, that needsrepair is set on the
> > > +# fs, the kernel won't mount; and that a non-injecting repair run clears
> > > +# needsrepair and makes the filesystem mountable again.
> > > +#
> > > +# Repeat with the trip point set to successively higher numbers of writes until
> > > +# we hit ~200 writes or repair manages to run to completion without tripping.
> > > +
> > > +seq=`basename $0`
> > > +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> > > +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> > > +
> > > +here=`pwd`
> > > +tmp=/tmp/$$
> > > +status=1    # failure is the default!
> > > +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> > > +
> > > +_cleanup()
> > > +{
> > > +	cd /
> > > +	rm -f $tmp.*
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> > > +. ./common/rc
> > > +. ./common/populate
> > > +. ./common/filter
> > > +
> > > +# real QA test starts here
> > > +_supported_fs xfs
> > > +_require_scratch_nocheck
> > > +_require_scratch_xfs_crc		# needsrepair only exists for v5
> > > +_require_populate_commands
> > > +_require_libxfs_debug_flag LIBXFS_DEBUG_WRITE_CRASH
> > > +
> > > +rm -f $seqres.full
> > > +
> > > +# Populate the filesystem
> > > +_scratch_populate_cached nofill >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> > > +
> > > +max_writes=200			# 200 loops should be enough for anyone
> > > +nr_incr=$((13 / TIME_FACTOR))
> > 
> > Could we randomize this increment so we get varying behavior run to run?
> > It might be nice to actually do that on a per-iteration basis as well
> > rather than once at the start of the test.
> 
> Ok, I'll add a little bit of randomness to each run.
> 
> How about:
> 
> 	local crash_after=$(( nr_writes + ((RANDOM % 7) - 3) ))
> 	LIBXFS_DEBUG_WRITE_CRASH=ddev=$crash_after _scratch_xfs_repair
> 
> ?
> 

Seems reasonable to me.

> > > +test $nr_incr -lt 1 && nr_incr=1
> > > +for ((nr_writes = 1; nr_writes < max_writes; nr_writes += nr_incr)); do
> > > +	# Start a repair and force it to abort after some number of writes
> > > +	LIBXFS_DEBUG_WRITE_CRASH=ddev=$nr_writes \
> > > +			_scratch_xfs_repair 2>> $seqres.full
> > > +	res=$?
> > > +	if [ $res -ne 0 ] && [ $res -ne 137 ]; then
> > > +		echo "repair failed with $res??"
> > > +		break
> > > +	elif [ $res -eq 0 ]; then
> > > +		[ $nr_writes -eq 1 ] && \
> > > +			echo "ran to completion on the first try?"
> > > +		break
> > > +	fi
> > > +
> > > +	# Check the state of NEEDSREPAIR after repair fails.  If it isn't set
> > > +	# but if repair -n says the fs is clean, then it's possible that the
> > > +	# injected error caused it to abort immediately after the write that
> > > +	# cleared NEEDSREPAIR.
> > > +	if ! _check_scratch_xfs_features NEEDSREPAIR > /dev/null &&
> > > +	   ! _scratch_xfs_repair -n &>> $seqres.full; then
> > > +		echo "NEEDSREPAIR should be set on corrupt fs"
> > > +	fi
> > > +
> > > +	# Repair properly this time and retry the mount
> > 
> > We can probably drop the "retry the mount" bit since we no longer do
> > that.
> 
> Oops, yes, good catch.
> 
> > > +	_scratch_xfs_repair 2>> $seqres.full
> > > +	_check_scratch_xfs_features NEEDSREPAIR > /dev/null && \
> > > +		echo "Repair failed to clear NEEDSREPAIR on the $nr_writes writes test"
> > 
> > Maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought we were going to let repair run and
> > fail repeatedly/incrementally and then leave the full repair for the
> > end..?
> 
> Ah.  Last time you wrote:
> 
> "It probably makes sense to test that NEEDSREPAIR remains set throughout
> the test sequence until repair completes cleanly..."
> 
> and I interpreted "throughout the test sequence" to mean "until the
> end of the loop body", not the whole test.
> 

Looking back, I think I was referring to the mount cycles in that
particular comment and had the repeated failure test in mind when I
wrote:

"Would we expect much difference in behavior if we populated once at the
start of the test and then just bumped up the write count until we get
to the max or the repair completes?"

... but that was probably not clear. Anyways..

> But I guess it /would/ be more interesting to study the effects of
> multiple successive write failures. ;)
> 

Yeah, assuming it doesn't outright explode from the onset, I think it's
beneficial to take full advantage of the failure mechanism and make the
test as mean as possible. ;)

Brian

> --D
> 
> > 
> > Brian
> > 
> > > +done
> > > +
> > > +# success, all done
> > > +echo Silence is golden.
> > > +status=0
> > > +exit
> > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/770.out b/tests/xfs/770.out
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 00000000..725d740b
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/tests/xfs/770.out
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> > > +QA output created by 770
> > > +Silence is golden.
> > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/group b/tests/xfs/group
> > > index d1b1456b..461ae2b2 100644
> > > --- a/tests/xfs/group
> > > +++ b/tests/xfs/group
> > > @@ -522,3 +522,5 @@
> > >  537 auto quick
> > >  538 auto stress
> > >  539 auto quick mount
> > > +768 auto quick repair
> > > +770 auto repair
> > > 
> > 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-22 11:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-21  0:22 [PATCHSET v5 0/1] fstests: make sure NEEDSREPAIR feature stops mounts Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-21  0:22 ` [PATCH 1/1] xfs: test that the needsrepair feature works as advertised Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-21  6:01   ` Amir Goldstein
2021-04-21 15:58     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-21 17:29   ` Brian Foster
2021-04-21 20:37     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-22 11:25       ` Brian Foster [this message]
2021-04-22  0:49   ` [PATCH v5.1 " Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-22 11:26     ` Brian Foster
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-04-14  1:05 [PATCHSET v4 0/1] fstests: make sure NEEDSREPAIR feature stops mounts Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-14  1:05 ` [PATCH 1/1] xfs: test that the needsrepair feature works as advertised Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-18 12:14   ` Eryu Guan
2021-04-20 18:26     ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YIFdEWV5StltoTBQ@bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=guan@eryu.me \
    --cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).