From: Sergey Vlasov <vsu@altlinux.ru>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, junkio@cox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add '--create-index' to git-unpack-objects
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 18:55:48 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051012145548.GA2539@master.mivlgu.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0510121612340.6307@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1242 bytes --]
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 04:25:22PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Sergey Vlasov wrote:
> > Saving unpacked objects in memory would obviously be unacceptable.
>
> Actually, this is what git-unpack-objects does. All unresolved deltas are
> stored in a linked list, and handled later.
Yes, this may be a problem if the pack is large and contains many
deltas. But these stored deltas are thrown away immediately when the
base object is found; if you want to implement a streaming reindex,
you will need to store them until you reach the end of pack (or write
those objects to some temporary files).
> Of course, it would be nicer to use a seekable file if you have one. But
> then, I am not at all sure that base objects should be allowed to come
> later in the file: since the delta chains must not be cyclic, the objects
> can be sorted. Thus, it could be guaranteed that the base objects are
> already unpacked when unpacking the derived object.
Hmm, pack-objects.c:write_one() does exactly the opposite - it writes
the base object _after_ writing out the delta (but it does not ensure
that ordering completely, so references to base objects can be
pointing in both directions). Why?
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-12 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-12 11:02 [PATCH] Add '--create-index' to git-unpack-objects Johannes Schindelin
2005-10-12 13:34 ` Sergey Vlasov
2005-10-12 13:54 ` [PATCH] Add git-index-pack utility Sergey Vlasov
2005-10-12 14:33 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-10-12 15:01 ` Sergey Vlasov
2005-10-12 23:57 ` [PATCH] Fix packname hash generation Junio C Hamano
2005-10-13 1:23 ` [PATCH] clone-pack: new option --keep to keep the pack unexploded Junio C Hamano
2005-10-13 2:46 ` [PATCH] Fix packname hash generation Junio C Hamano
2005-10-12 14:25 ` [PATCH] Add '--create-index' to git-unpack-objects Johannes Schindelin
2005-10-12 14:55 ` Sergey Vlasov [this message]
2005-10-12 15:08 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-10-12 15:20 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051012145548.GA2539@master.mivlgu.local \
--to=vsu@altlinux.ru \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).