From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Horst von Brand Subject: Re: cg-mv Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:32:14 -0300 Message-ID: <200510122232.j9CMWEhN003974@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> References: Cc: Zack Brown , Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Oct 13 15:13:53 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EQ2ri-0006TZ-KC for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 15:11:23 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751055AbVJMNLO (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:11:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751045AbVJMNLN (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:11:13 -0400 Received: from inti.inf.utfsm.cl ([200.1.21.155]:20953 "EHLO inti.inf.utfsm.cl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750771AbVJMNLN (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:11:13 -0400 Received: from laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl (fw.inf.utfsm.cl [200.1.19.2]) by inti.inf.utfsm.cl (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j9DDAT3C004667 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 13 Oct 2005 10:10:31 -0300 Received: from laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl (8.13.5/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j9CMWEhN003974; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:32:14 -0300 To: Petr Baudis In-Reply-To: Message from Petr Baudis of "Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:07:57 +0200." <20051012100757.GM30889@pasky.or.cz> X-Mailer: MH-E 7.4.2; nmh 1.1; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 17) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0b5 (inti.inf.utfsm.cl [200.1.21.155]); Thu, 13 Oct 2005 10:10:31 -0300 (CLST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.86.2, clamav-milter version 0.86 on localhost X-Virus-Status: Clean Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 04:33:33PM CEST, I got a letter > where Zack Brown told me that... > > IIRC, file renaming is something we only care about at read time, we > > don't actually need to track it while making the change, because git > > allows us to track data from file to file without having to tell it > > that the data is moving. > > So, just to keep certain people happy, why not have the cg-mv command > > defined to something like this: What about git-rename(1)? For completeness, just wrap it into cg-mv. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513