From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Wong Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] 'git svn info' fixes Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 01:16:54 -0700 Message-ID: <20080829081654.GA6680@yp-box.dyndns.org> References: <1219779157-31602-1-git-send-email-trast@student.ethz.ch> <20080827095342.GB26475@untitled> <200808281031.04975.trast@student.ethz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano To: Thomas Rast X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Aug 29 10:18:11 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KYzBC-0002i2-Vv for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:18:03 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752423AbYH2IQ6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:16:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751628AbYH2IQ5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:16:57 -0400 Received: from hand.yhbt.net ([66.150.188.102]:58830 "EHLO hand.yhbt.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751186AbYH2IQ4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:16:56 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hand.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B50AA2DC01B; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 01:16:55 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200808281031.04975.trast@student.ethz.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Thomas Rast wrote: > Eric Wong wrote: > > Thomas Rast wrote: > > > However, the unknown files tests still fail, simply because 'svn info' > > > itself fails on untracked files. It would be great if someone who is > > > still running SVN 1.4 could check whether that has been a bug in > > > git-svn all along, or is actually a behaviour change on the part of > > > SVN. > > > > Oops, I upgraded to 1.5.x here already. I should still have > > another machine with 1.4 to check on tomorrow, though. > > I got a friend with 1.4 to test this, and it appears the error > > $ touch new > $ svn info new > new: (Keine versionierte Ressource) > > (literally "not a versioned resource") is already present in > > $ svn --version > svn, Version 1.4.6 (r28521) > > (He also says the error is the same if the file does not exist at > all.) Interesting. > So should we just change all "unknown foo" tests to verify that 'git > svn info' errors out too? Yes, I see no reason to differ from plain svn here. -- Eric Wong