git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Switch receive.denyCurrentBranch to "refuse"
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:11:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090211001138.GU21473@genesis.frugalware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0901301426150.3586@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 838 bytes --]

[ Sorry for the late reply, I did not read my mail recently. ]

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 02:28:39PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> > Shouldn't this be
> > 
> > git config receive.denyCurrentBranch ignore
> > 
> > instead of "true"?
> 
> Right.
> 
> However, as Junio pointed out, we do not want to give this resolution in 
> the error message.  I am now leaning more to something like
> 
> 	refusing to update checked out branch '%s' in non-bare repository
> 
> Hmm?
> 
> Old-timers will know "oh, what the hell, I did not mark my repository as 
> bare!", and new-timers will no longer be confused.

So in an "I know what I'm doing" mode, is "git config core.bare true" in
a non-bare repo considered as a better workaround than using "git config
receive.denyCurrentBranch ignore"?

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-11  0:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1233275583u.git.johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
2009-01-30  0:34 ` [PATCH] Switch receive.denyCurrentBranch to "refuse" Johannes Schindelin
2009-01-30  1:28   ` Jay Soffian
2009-01-30  1:32   ` Asheesh Laroia
2010-04-13 16:42     ` [PATCH] Switch receive.denyCurrentBranch to &quot;refuse&quot; Dave Abrahams
2010-04-13 17:57     ` [PATCH] Switch receive.denyCurrentBranch to "refuse" Junio C Hamano
     [not found]   ` <7v4ozhd1wp.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
2009-01-30  2:18     ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-30 13:24       ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-01-30 16:33         ` Jeff King
2009-01-30 16:55           ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-01-30  2:30   ` Miklos Vajna
2009-01-30 13:28     ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-11  0:11       ` Miklos Vajna [this message]
2009-02-11  1:04         ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-30  2:55   ` Jeff King
2009-01-30 14:11     ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-01-30  7:17   ` Johannes Sixt
2009-01-30  7:34     ` Jeff King
2009-01-30 13:23       ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-01-30 14:35         ` Jeff King
2009-01-30 16:17   ` Jay Soffian
2009-01-30 16:28     ` Jeff King
2009-01-30 17:01     ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-01-30 18:50       ` Jay Soffian
2009-01-30 19:03         ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-01-31  0:56           ` Nanako Shiraishi
2009-02-01  1:27             ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-01  1:39               ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-02 12:41               ` Jeff King
2009-02-03  4:30                 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-03 17:45                   ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-06 14:06                     ` Jeff King
2009-02-07  7:51                       ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-03  8:01                 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-03  8:07                   ` Jeff King
2009-02-03  9:22                     ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-01  2:06             ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-01  3:37               ` Sam Vilain
2009-02-01 21:33                 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-02  7:00                   ` Sam Vilain
2009-02-02  8:32                     ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-02 10:50                       ` Sam Vilain
2009-02-01 22:59             ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-01 23:56               ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090211001138.GU21473@genesis.frugalware.org \
    --to=vmiklos@frugalware.org \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).