From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nanako Shiraishi Subject: Re: [PATCH] disallow refs containing successive slashes Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:47:00 +0900 Message-ID: <20091012114700.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> References: <4AD0C93C.6050306@web.de> <7vws327wbp.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4AD1B6A4.8060405@web.de> <7vbpkdwyo2.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Jens Lehmann , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 12 04:48:46 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MxAxp-0000qo-Bd for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 04:48:45 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753261AbZJLCsG (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:48:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753216AbZJLCsF (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:48:05 -0400 Received: from karen.lavabit.com ([72.249.41.33]:49927 "EHLO karen.lavabit.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753194AbZJLCsF (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:48:05 -0400 Received: from c.earth.lavabit.com (c.earth.lavabit.com [192.168.111.12]) by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EAA911B8F6; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:47:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 6443.lavabit.com (customer-148-233-239-23.uninet.net.mx [148.233.239.23]) by lavabit.com with ESMTP id D1TZSJ7BJ8LT; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:47:28 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com; b=c8aTrmQRQwVPY1TtEuchAlKU4ZFyDF2qphcQbC4kEpLcI1O9KfFrIDd8cWIN+m7IOcsH7F5+cZpxb/DPVdxYh31CeeCqe1RG5PxX+8iNChKTsr9UaEGHWgQOs6ty6e+XwIhwLoZ7h9VDTytZFwT22YvXY/NSGF7HpeR03kZylOs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id; In-Reply-To: <7vbpkdwyo2.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Quoting Junio C Hamano writes: > Jens Lehmann writes: >> Yes, one solution could be to fix every application handling branch, tag >> or repo names to mimic the namechange done in the bowels of git. But i >> think it is not worth the hassle. > Besides, by rejecting what we used to accept you are breaking people's > expectations. So I am moderately negative, unless you can say your "every > application" is literally _tons_. Isn't 1.7.0 a good release to break such people's expectations? -- Nanako Shiraishi http://ivory.ap.teacup.com/nanako3/