From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: 'git add' regression in git-1.7? Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:34:31 -0500 Message-ID: <20100219053431.GB22645@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <32541b131002182042p610fce4ex96efbffea9afe2ed@mail.gmail.com> <32541b131002182115t5501d0d1u19367a4d8e7627e4@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: SungHyun Nam , git@vger.kernel.org To: Avery Pennarun X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 19 06:34:39 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiLVe-00078b-VP for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 06:34:39 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752076Ab0BSFee convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:34:34 -0500 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:60960 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751317Ab0BSFed (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:34:33 -0500 Received: (qmail 11279 invoked by uid 107); 19 Feb 2010 05:34:46 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:34:46 -0500 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:34:31 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <32541b131002182115t5501d0d1u19367a4d8e7627e4@mail.gmail.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:15:02AM -0500, Avery Pennarun wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:04 AM, SungHyun Nam wro= te: > > Well, before sending the previous email, I checked the > > RelNotes-1.7.*.txt, =C2=A0and could not find such a change by searc= hing > > 'git add'. =C2=A0So, I thought it's a regression. >=20 > As far as I know, git add has refused to add ignored files for as lon= g > as I can remember. Maybe there was briefly a bug in this behaviour > that was later fixed... >=20 > If you use 'git bisect' on the git repo, you could probably discover > what happened, in case you're interested. It was intentional. Try 48ffef9 (ls-files: fix overeager pathspec optimization, 2010-01-08). -Peff