From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Baudis Subject: Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+ Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 10:10:52 +0200 Message-ID: <20100402081052.GW3533@machine.or.cz> References: <7vaav8hpfo.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <87tytdiqob.fsf@steelpick.localdomain> <873a0xhwxs.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87eikfhec1.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87pr2i8g8o.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> <20100402074343.GV3533@machine.or.cz> <87mxxm8f76.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Michal Sojka X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Apr 02 10:11:03 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nxby2-0005Os-1K for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 10:11:02 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759280Ab0DBIK5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Apr 2010 04:10:57 -0400 Received: from w241.dkm.cz ([62.24.88.241]:45887 "EHLO machine.or.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756568Ab0DBIKy (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Apr 2010 04:10:54 -0400 Received: by machine.or.cz (Postfix, from userid 2001) id 8459886208B; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 10:10:52 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mxxm8f76.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Michal Sojka wrote: > On Fri, 02 Apr 2010, Petr Baudis wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 09:29:11AM +0200, Michal Sojka wrote: > > > We would like to extend the license of that file from GPLv2 only > > > license to GPLv2+ by adding the recommended "or any later version" > > > clause to the license. This will give us license compatibility with > > > GPLv3 projects, which would like to reuse test-lib.sh. > > > > Huh, didn't we just run through this about a month ago? Is this some > > kind of stale e-mail message? > > The month ago, I didn't contact *ALL* contributors, but only the ones > with significat contribution. Now I want to finish relicensing by > contacting all contributors as sugested in some responses. Then perhaps you should exclude those who already replied earlier? It seems to me the list on the wiki is quite similar in magnitude to the recipient list of the last mail, surely there's no need to bother everyone again just for few extra people? -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis http://pasky.or.cz/ | "Ars longa, vita brevis." -- Hippocrates