From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+ Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 12:54:30 -0400 Message-ID: <20100402165430.GA18576@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <873a0xhwxs.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87eikfhec1.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87pr2i8g8o.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> <20100402074343.GV3533@machine.or.cz> <87mxxm8f76.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> <20100402081052.GW3533@machine.or.cz> <87iq8a8dj8.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Petr Baudis , git@vger.kernel.org To: Michal Sojka X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Apr 02 18:54:59 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nxk93-0000gn-5n for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 18:54:57 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755387Ab0DBQys (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Apr 2010 12:54:48 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:49304 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755295Ab0DBQyn (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Apr 2010 12:54:43 -0400 Received: (qmail 15971 invoked by uid 107); 2 Apr 2010 16:55:18 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 12:55:18 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 02 Apr 2010 12:54:30 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87iq8a8dj8.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 10:27:39AM +0200, Michal Sojka wrote: > > Then perhaps you should exclude those who already replied earlier? > > It seems to me the list on the wiki is quite similar in magnitude to > > the recipient list of the last mail, surely there's no need to bother > > everyone again just for few extra people? > > That's exactly what I did. I excluded those who stated explicitely that > they agree. Shall I take your response as an agreement? I'm not sure how you did it, but I already assented in the earlier thread (and am listed on the wiki) and still got the mail. But anyway, to be very clear: YES, I agree to relicense all my contributions to test-lib.sh to GPLv2+ with the addition of the "or any later version" clause. -Peff