From: "SZEDER Gábor" <szeder@ira.uka.de>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/19] tests: add tests for the bash prompt functions in the completion script
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 22:33:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120509203354.GC6958@goldbirke> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vvck5ryl2.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 11:36:25AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de> writes:
>
> > The tests cover the discovery of the '.git' directory in the __gitdir()
> > function in different scenarios, and the prompt itself, i.e. branch
> > name, detached heads, operations (rebase, merge, cherry-pick, bisect),
> > and status indicators (dirty, stash, untracked files; but not the
> > upstream status).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de>
>
> Looks like a quite comprehensive tests around GIT_PS1_$MANY_DIFFERENT_STYLES
> (except that GIT_PS1_SHOWUPSTREAM seems to be missing); very nice.
I've mentioned in the commit message that "... status indicators ...
but not the upstream status". I didn't wrote tests for that because
this series doesn't changes anything in the function producing the
upstream status indicator.
However, thinking about it now, this series, in particular patch 16
(bash prompt: display stash and upstream state even inside the
repository), does change the context in which that function might be
invoked, i.e. not only from the work tree but even from within the
repository. I don't think that would break anything (famous last
words ;), because that function runs git config, rev-list, and log,
and AFAICT these commands should work in a repository just as well,
and the rest of the function is just preparing their arguments and
processing their output.
Anyway, it would be definitely better to have a test to show that it
indeed works from within a repository, but I didn't want to fiddle
with svn upstreams. Perhaps patch 16 should leave the upstream status
indicator as it is until someone ;) writes tests for it; since that
function doesn't affect the main codepath and it involves several
subshells and git processes anyway, there is not that much to be
gained anyway.
> > + echo 1 > file &&
>
> When you are going to re-roll to add the missing SHOWUPSTREAM test, in
> addition to J6t's $PWD vs $(pwd) vs $TRASH_DIRECTORY fix, please fix these
> redirections to match the coding styles (i.e. "cmd >file" and "cmd <file",
> with SP before and without SP after redirection operators).
OK.
I just followed suit of the recently added t9902-completion.sh, which
uses SP on both sides of redirection operators.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-09 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-09 0:44 [PATCH 00/19] Bash prompt speedup SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 0:44 ` [PATCH 01/19] tests: move code to run tests under bash into a helper library SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 0:44 ` [PATCH 02/19] tests: add tests for the bash prompt functions in the completion script SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 8:07 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-05-09 18:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-10 6:09 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-05-09 18:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-09 20:33 ` SZEDER Gábor [this message]
2012-05-09 0:44 ` [PATCH 03/19] completion: use __gitdir() in _git_log() SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 18:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-09 19:01 ` SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 0:44 ` [PATCH 04/19] completion: respect $GIT_DIR SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 8:09 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-05-09 18:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-09 0:44 ` [PATCH 05/19] bash prompt: don't show the prompt when .git/HEAD is unreadable SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 19:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-09 19:45 ` SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 0:44 ` [PATCH 06/19] bash prompt: return early from __git_ps1() when not in a git repository SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 0:44 ` [PATCH 07/19] completion: make __gitdir() store repository path in $__git_dir SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 19:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-09 0:44 ` [PATCH 08/19] completion: use $__git_dir instead of $(__gitdir) SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 19:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-09 20:22 ` SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 20:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-09 21:36 ` SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 0:44 ` [RFC PATCH 09/19] completion: platform-specific helper function to get physical path SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 7:37 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-05-09 0:44 ` [PATCH 10/19] completion: use bash builtins to search for repository SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 19:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-09 22:34 ` SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 22:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-09 0:44 ` [PATCH 11/19] bash prompt: use bash builtins to find out current branch SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 20:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-09 21:11 ` SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 21:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-09 21:45 ` SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 21:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-09 0:44 ` [PATCH 12/19] bash prompt: use bash builtins to check whether inside git dir SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 8:07 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-05-09 20:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-09 0:44 ` [PATCH 13/19] bash prompt: check whether inside the worktree only when necessary SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 0:44 ` [PATCH 14/19] bash prompt: use bash builtins to find out current branch during rebase SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 0:44 ` [PATCH 15/19] bash prompt: use bash builtins to get detached HEAD abbrev. object name SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 0:44 ` [PATCH 16/19] bash prompt: display stash and upstream state even inside the repository SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 0:44 ` [PATCH 17/19] bash prompt: use bash builtins to check stash state SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 0:44 ` [RFC PATCH 18/19] bash prompt: avoid command substitution when checking for untracked files SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 20:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-09 0:44 ` [PATCH 19/19] bash prompt: alternative git prompt without command substitution SZEDER Gábor
2012-05-09 19:38 ` Andrew Sayers
2012-05-09 22:08 ` SZEDER Gábor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120509203354.GC6958@goldbirke \
--to=szeder@ira.uka.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).