From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Harmful LESS flags Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 18:02:41 -0400 Message-ID: <20140424220241.GC7815@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <4dc69237123e8962b2b2b901692ea78e.id@mailtor> <87lhuvb9kr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87tx9ia5zq.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <20140424213529.GB7815@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: David Kastrup , d9ba@mailtor.net, git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Apr 25 00:03:07 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WdRjX-0005JR-0n for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:03:07 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755901AbaDXWDB (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2014 18:03:01 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:37857 "HELO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1756198AbaDXWCn (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2014 18:02:43 -0400 Received: (qmail 12163 invoked by uid 102); 24 Apr 2014 22:02:43 -0000 Received: from c-71-63-4-13.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (71.63.4.13) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 17:02:43 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 24 Apr 2014 18:02:41 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 02:47:01PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > And I do agree that the "chopped marker" would be a very sensible > thing to show in the "-S" output; I would have chosen "$" myself for > that to match an existing practice in (setq truncate-lines t) in > Emacs, though. Hmm. I do not use Emacs, but I explicitly avoided "$" because of its end-of-line connotations. E.g., in "cat -A" it means the opposite: this is the real "\n" end-of-line. But if there's existing precedent for "$", that would be fine with me. -Peff