From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] CodingGuidelines: typofix
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 16:33:27 -0400
Message-ID: <20140502203327.GB32500@sigill.intra.peff.net>
References: <1398894312-30763-1-git-send-email-gitster@pobox.com>
 <1398894312-30763-2-git-send-email-gitster@pobox.com>
 <87tx99zj31.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <xmqqoazhcrqg.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
 <20140501212714.GB14441@sigill.intra.peff.net>
 <xmqqfvksav81.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Cc: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>, git@vger.kernel.org
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 02 22:33:36 2014
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>)
	id 1WgK9E-0000uX-U3
	for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 02 May 2014 22:33:33 +0200
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752732AbaEBUd3 (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git-2@m.gmane.org>);
	Fri, 2 May 2014 16:33:29 -0400
Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:43812 "HELO peff.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id S1752197AbaEBUd3 (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 2 May 2014 16:33:29 -0400
Received: (qmail 21820 invoked by uid 102); 2 May 2014 20:33:29 -0000
Received: from c-71-63-4-13.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (71.63.4.13)
  (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5)
  by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Fri, 02 May 2014 15:33:29 -0500
Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 02 May 2014 16:33:27 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <xmqqfvksav81.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <git.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/247969>

On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 11:31:10AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> But let's follow this one:
> 
> http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=judgement%20call%2C%20judgment%20call&cmpt=q
> 
> which seems to say that with 'e' is more common.

Grammar by democracy. ;)

> *1* To Americans, the form with 'e' is abomination.  Wikipedia
> claims that (1) without 'e' is in legal and (2) with 'e' in other
> contexts in British (this particular one is a non-legal use), and
> (3) both are equally acceptable in non-legal contexts in Austraria
> and Canada.

That is what I found most interesting about the discussion. The reason I
bothered to look it up and say something is that as an American, I would
without a doubt spell it with the "e", contradicting what I found
online. Oh well. 

-Peff